Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 06/06/2026 5:16:00 PM PDT by Red Badger
Water has mass, and mass has leverage. Move enough groundwater from aquifers onto farms, into cities, and eventually into the ocean, and Earth’s spin changes by a measurable amount.
The shift is tiny on a planetary scale, but the number still grabs you: between 1993 and 2010, researchers estimated that groundwater depletion nudged Earth’s rotational pole by about 31.5 inches.
The figure comes from a 2023 study in Geophysical Research Letters, which estimated that humans depleted about 2,150 gigatons of groundwater between 1993 and 2010. When researchers added that water movement to their polar-motion model, the model lined up much better with the observed drift of Earth’s rotational pole. The same groundwater loss equaled about 6.24 millimeters—roughly 0.24 inches—of global sea-level rise.
“Earth’s rotational pole actually changes a lot,” Ki-Weon Seo, a geophysicist at Seoul National University and study lead, says in a statement. “Our study shows that among climate-related causes, the redistribution of groundwater actually has the largest impact on the drift of the rotational pole.”
Earth’s rotational pole is not fixed in place. It drifts and wobbles as mass shifts around the planet. In 2016, NASA described the effect in plain mechanical terms: add weight to one part of a spinning top, and it spins a little differently. Earth is not a tabletop toy, obviously, but the physics rhyme. Shift enough water from land to ocean, and the spin axis responds.
This study in Geophysical Research Letters attempts to add some hard figures to that realization. “I’m very glad to find the unexplained cause of the rotation pole drift,” Seo says. “On the other hand, as a resident of Earth and a father, I’m concerned and surprised to see that pumping groundwater is another source of sea-level rise.”
The study used data from 1993 through 2010 and estimated that the depletion of about 2,150 gigatons of groundwater helped move Earth’s rotational pole roughly 31.5 inches. Much of that pumping was for irrigation and human use, with water that had been stored underground eventually making its way to the oceans.
In the study, researchers modeled observed changes in Earth’s rotational pole and tested different water-redistribution scenarios. The scenario that best matched the observed drift included 2,150 gigatons of groundwater depletion. While the pole motion helped constrain the groundwater estimate, it wasn’t exactly a before-and-after picture of pumps yanking Earth off balance.
Surendra Adhikari, a research scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory who was involved in the 2016 study, says the additional research is important. “They’ve quantified the role of groundwater pumping on polar motion,” he says in a news release, “and it’s pretty significant.”
Moving water out of the midlatitudes has an outsized effect on polar motion, and the 2023 study pointed to heavy groundwater depletion in western North America and northwestern India as especially important to the modeled drift.
A 2026 Journal of Geodesy reappraisal using the WaterGAP hydrological model found that terrestrial water storage plays a significant role in polar motion across different timescales. But in that model, the longer-term trend was driven mainly by snow-water-storage changes tied to snowfall patterns and Greenland melt, while groundwater and reservoir storage showed up as smaller but still detectable contributors. The paper also found that its modeled long-term trend still didn’t fully agree with GRACE and satellite-laser-ranging observations.
Scientists are also getting better tools for looking backward. In 2026, researchers introduced TWSTORE, a four-decade terrestrial-water-storage reconstruction beginning in 1984, and ML-TWiX, a monthly global total-water-storage-anomaly reconstruction covering 1980 to 2012. Both are attempts to push water-storage records deeper into the pre-GRACE era, where the satellite record is thinner and the uncertainties get harder to ignore.
We still need a longer view is badly needed. Polar motion involves groundwater, snow, ice sheets, glaciers, sea-level redistribution, reservoirs, and processes inside Earth itself. While newer research has tightened some pieces of that budget, it hasn’t yet turned the planet’s wobble into a solved equation.
“Observing changes in Earth’s rotational pole is useful,” Seo says, “for understanding continent-scale water storage variations.”
As for how this affects humans, groundwater depletion can sink land, worsen relative sea-level rise, stress coastal aquifers, and help saltwater push into places that depend on fresh groundwater. A 2026 Nature study of 40 major river deltas found that contemporary subsidence now exceeds absolute sea-level rise as the dominant driver of relative sea-level rise for most deltas studied, with groundwater storage showing the strongest relative influence on vertical land motion in 10 of the 40 deltas. Another 2026 global coastal assessment in Nature Water found statistically detectable groundwater-level trends in 21 percent of gridded coastal areas, with declines becoming more frequent in the most recent nine years of the study.
There is some good news. A 2026 review in Scienceexamined 67 cases of groundwater recovery after interventions and found that aquifers can rebound under the right conditions. The fixes most often involved alternative water supplies, artificial recharge, policy changes, or some combination of the three. But the hard part is that those successes aren’t plug-and-play. A basin that recovers because a city found another water source doesn’t give every dry region the same escape route.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Wiĺl the hoax deniers scream after Trump tilts it back?
Rosie O’Donnell lost enough weight to do that??
How about all those massive wind turbines. They convert energy from wind which means the power of the wind must be reduced in order to do so. How many of these monstrosities will it take to have a detrimental effect on weather patterns?
,,, it’s more likely all the iron ore transferred to China from Australia :)
Data from 1993 to 2010. Yeah. Okay.
If the WEF and the WHO can kill 3.1 billion people by viruses, vaccines, mosquitoes, ticks, and chem-laced foods, the earth will tilt back!
You mean from Australia to China...
It’s the 3 Gorges Dam.
Could be the case that the windmills are blowing the earf off of it’s axis.
“depletion of about 2,150 gigatons of groundwater helped move Earth’s rotational pole roughly 31.5 inches. Much of that pumping was for irrigation and human use, with water that had been stored underground eventually making its way to the oceans.”
Of which none of their models stipulate how much water seeps back into the ground.
We need a trillion dollar grant to study this!...........
Oh no, we are all going to die again!
,,, and the ever increasing Chinese navy.
My garden loves it.
I say we leave it be.
What about the MASSIVE amount of the Sun’s energy that was STOLEN to charge those frackin electric machines? All of that energy and light was stolen from the plant life! It is the opposite of greening the Earth. Just how much more plant life would there be?
C’mon, Man!
Those uneven globs of molten material moving around inside the earth probably have more to do with it than pumping water.
Aah crap. If we’re doomed, then I guess there’s no reason to skip that fourth cheeseburger and cigarette. 🚬😎
OK just wait till Data Centers’ water use is factored in!
I’m willing to move up to 20 pounds of lead from Northeast to Southeast on my property. If only it will help the planet.
Science tells me that this move will help the planet spin better and not cause global warming. Or global cooling.
Also, I may need to leave my diesel truck idling to warm things up. Or I might need to leave it idling with the AC on to cool things down.
I’m so confused.
The oceans are part of earth’s mass as is the H2O in the atmosphere. The contribution to earth’s mass from H2O is not lost, its moved around, and even moves back to places it was before.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.