Following Trump’s Lead on the Climate Hoax

I remember, many years ago, being on a business trip to the Boston area. As I was driving to my hotel there was a news break on the radio station I was listening to. The news announcer stated that the UN was releasing a request for proposals for a computer model that would predict global warming from CO2 emissions and that the contract would be awarded to the company producing a model that showed the greatest warming. Being an engineer I thought to myself “that is not how science works”. Then I thought that the announcer probably stated the part that was not meant to be shared. And then I thought “This thing is going to be a big hoax”.

Only 4.67 years left.

There has been a huge shift within the public and private sectors on climate change as it has dawned on governments and companies that the United States, under President Donald Trump, will no longer be a patsy to a cabal of international elites who seek to impose costly climate restrictions upon American businesses and international climate boondoggles upon nations.

Now that they need those AI Datacenters, now Climate change doesn’t matter anymore.

Following Trump’s Lead on Combatting the Climate Hoax

Would be clearer!

Regards,

Climate Change/Global Warming has been the largest financial scam in the history of the world. Imagine for a moment how much better the Earth would be today if the $trillions wasted on the scam were instead used to clean our environment. There would still have been graft & corruption, but at least something positive would have been accomplished for our world.

The green bit has always been a scam, but the government has generally run with it because it’s advantageous to them.

I suspect that the bulk of government folks hopping off that horse are only doing so because of the short term impossibility of doing both the green scam and AI, due to its power requirements.

AI is definitely a technological leap that should be pursued in my opinion (though I think the unusually high power reqs demonstrate we have a way to go and it should not be government funded like EVs), but I also suspect that the primary reason government loves it is the increased surveillance ability it will provide them.

I think we’re going to wind up, not with computers capable of standalone performance at home, but with dumb terminals, with all function and data hosted in the cloud allowing complete surveillance of all your digital activities, whether to better direct advertising or hunting for anything the state thinks is problematic.

Where do I go to say, I told ya so..I told ya so

I believe the climates a littlke from timeto time, but think it is probably temporary. Spending lots of money to change something you can only accomodate for sure seems foolhardy.

I wrote this post somewhere between 2021 and 2024. This is truer today than it was when I wrote it, and Trump 100% led the way on this. I know this is very long, but it is well worth every single sentence to read it, as Trump said this, on the public stage, in front of the world. It is bold, unequivocal, and just months after he took office. He spoke out on this when it was unpopular to do so.

If you think this is too long to read, I promise you, you are missing the essence of why some of us believe Trump is a politician now like no other. Even if you read only the bold, red sections, you will understand what I mean.

This is one reason I appreciate Donald Trump, and wish fervently for him to be President again in 2024. THIS SPEECH HE GAVE TO ANNOUNCE THE USA WAS WITHDRAWING FROM THE PARIS CLIMATE ACCORDS SAYS IT ALL!

Statement by President Trump on the Paris Climate Accord-June 1, 2017

Thank you very much. (Applause.) Thank you. I would like to begin by addressing the terrorist attack in Manila. We’re closely monitoring the situation, and I will continue to give updates if anything happens during this period of time. But it is really very sad as to what’s going on throughout the world with terror. Our thoughts and our prayers are with all of those affected. Before we discuss the Paris Accord, I’d like to begin with an update on our tremendous — absolutely tremendous — economic progress since Election Day on November 8th. The economy is starting to come back, and very, very rapidly. We’ve added $3.3 trillion in stock market value to our economy, and more than a million private sector jobs.

I have just returned from a trip overseas where we concluded nearly $350 billion of military and economic development for the United States, creating hundreds of thousands of jobs. It was a very, very successful trip, believe me. (Applause.) Thank you. Thank you.

In my meetings at the G7, we have taken historic steps to demand fair and reciprocal trade that gives Americans a level playing field against other nations. We’re also working very hard for peace in the Middle East, and perhaps even peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians. Our attacks on terrorism are greatly stepped up — and you see that, you see it all over — from the previous administration, including getting many other countries to make major contributions to the fight against terror. Big, big contributions are being made by countries that weren’t doing so much in the form of contribution.

One by one, we are keeping the promises I made to the American people during my campaign for President –- whether it’s cutting job-killing regulations; appointing and confirming a tremendous Supreme Court justice; putting in place tough new ethics rules; achieving a record reduction in illegal immigration on our southern border; or bringing jobs, plants, and factories back into the United States at numbers which no one until this point thought even possible. And believe me, we’ve just begun. The fruits of our labor will be seen very shortly even more so.

On these issues and so many more, we’re following through on our commitments. And I don’t want anything to get in our way. I am fighting every day for the great people of this country. Therefore, in order to fulfill my solemn duty to protect America and its citizens, the United States will withdraw from the Paris Climate Accord — (applause) — thank you, thank you — but begin negotiations to reenter either the Paris Accord or a really entirely new transaction on terms that are fair to the United States, its businesses, its workers, its people, its taxpayers. So we’re getting out. But we will start to negotiate, and we will see if we can make a deal that’s fair. And if we can, that’s great. And if we can’t, that’s fine. (Applause.)

As President, I can put no other consideration before the wellbeing of American citizens. The Paris Climate Accord is simply the latest example of Washington entering into an agreement that disadvantages the United States to the exclusive benefit of other countries, leaving American workers — who I love — and taxpayers to absorb the cost in terms of lost jobs, lower wages, shuttered factories, and vastly diminished economic production.

Thus, as of today, the United States will cease all implementation of the non-binding Paris Accord and the draconian financial and economic burdens the agreement imposes on our country. This includes ending the implementation of the nationally determined contribution and, very importantly, the Green Climate Fund which is costing the United States a vast fortune.

Compliance with the terms of the Paris Accord and the onerous energy restrictions it has placed on the United States could cost America as much as 2.7 million lost jobs by 2025 according to the National Economic Research Associates. This includes 440,000 fewer manufacturing jobs — not what we need — believe me, this is not what we need — including automobile jobs, and the further decimation of vital American industries on which countless communities rely. They rely for so much, and we would be giving them so little.

According to this same study, by 2040, compliance with the commitments put into place by the previous administration would cut production for the following sectors: paper down 12 percent; cement down 23 percent; iron and steel down 38 percent; coal — and I happen to love the coal miners — down 86 percent; natural gas down 31 percent. The cost to the economy at this time would be close to $3 trillion in lost GDP and 6.5 million industrial jobs, while households would have $7,000 less income and, in many cases, much worse than that.

Not only does this deal subject our citizens to harsh economic restrictions, it fails to live up to our environmental ideals. As someone who cares deeply about the environment, which I do, I cannot in good conscience support a deal that punishes the United States — which is what it does -– the world’s leader in environmental protection, while imposing no meaningful obligations on the world’s leading polluters.

For example, under the agreement, China will be able to increase these emissions by a staggering number of years — 13. They can do whatever they want for 13 years. Not us. India makes its participation contingent on receiving billions and billions and billions of dollars in foreign aid from developed countries. There are many other examples. But the bottom line is that the Paris Accord is very unfair, at the highest level, to the United States..

Further, while the current agreement effectively blocks the development of clean coal in America — which it does, and the mines are starting to open up. We’re having a big opening in two weeks. Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, so many places. A big opening of a brand-new mine. It’s unheard of. For many, many years, that hasn’t happened. They asked me if I’d go. I’m going to try.

China will be allowed to build hundreds of additional coal plants. So we can’t build the plants, but they can, according to this agreement. India will be allowed to double its coal production by 2020. Think of it: India can double their coal production. We’re supposed to get rid of ours. Even Europe is allowed to continue construction of coal plants..

In short, the agreement doesn’t eliminate coal jobs, it just transfers those jobs out of America and the United States, and ships them to foreign countries. This agreement is less about the climate and more about other countries gaining a financial advantage over the United States. The rest of the world applauded when we signed the Paris Agreement — they went wild; they were so happy — for the simple reason that it put our country, the United States of America, which we all love, at a very, very big economic disadvantage. A cynic would say the obvious reason for economic competitors and their wish to see us remain in the agreement is so that we continue to suffer this self-inflicted major economic wound. We would find it very hard to compete with other countries from other parts of the world..

We have among the most abundant energy reserves on the planet, sufficient to lift millions of America’s poorest workers out of poverty. Yet, under this agreement, we are effectively putting these reserves under lock and key, taking away the great wealth of our nation — it’s great wealth, it’s phenomenal wealth; not so long ago, we had no idea we had such wealth — and leaving millions and millions of families trapped in poverty and joblessness.

The agreement is a massive redistribution of United States wealth to other countries...

At 1 percent growth, renewable sources of energy can meet some of our domestic demand, but at 3 or 4 percent growth, which I expect, we need all forms of available American energy, or our country — (applause) — will be at grave risk of brownouts and blackouts, our businesses will come to a halt in many cases, and the American family will suffer the consequences in the form of lost jobs and a very diminished quality of life.

Even if the Paris Agreement were implemented in full, with total compliance from all nations, it is estimated it would only produce a two-tenths of one degree — think of that; this much — Celsius reduction in global temperature by the year 2100. Tiny, tiny amount. In fact, 14 days of carbon emissions from China alone would wipe out the gains from America — and this is an incredible statistic — would totally wipe out the gains from America’s expected reductions in the year 2030, after we have had to spend billions and billions of dollars, lost jobs, closed factories, and suffered much higher energy costs for our businesses and for our homes.

As the Wall Street Journal wrote this morning: “The reality is that withdrawing is in America’s economic interest and won’t matter much to the climate.” The United States, under the Trump administration, will continue to be the cleanest and most environmentally friendly country on Earth. We’ll be the cleanest. We’re going to have the cleanest air. We’re going to have the cleanest water. We will be environmentally friendly, but we’re not going to put our businesses out of work and we’re not going to lose our jobs. We’re going to grow; we’re going to grow rapidly. (Applause.)

And I think you just read — it just came out minutes ago, the small business report — small businesses as of just now are booming, hiring people. One of the best reports they’ve seen in many years.

I’m willing to immediately work with Democratic leaders to either negotiate our way back into Paris, under the terms that are fair to the United States and its workers, or to negotiate a new deal that protects our country and its taxpayers. (Applause.)

So if the obstructionists want to get together with me, let’s make them non-obstructionists. We will all sit down, and we will get back into the deal. And we’ll make it good, and we won’t be closing up our factories, and we won’t be losing our jobs. And we’ll sit down with the Democrats and all of the people that represent either the Paris Accord or something that we can do that’s much better than the Paris Accord. And I think the people of our country will be thrilled, and I think then the people of the world will be thrilled. But until we do that, we’re out of the agreement.

I will work to ensure that America remains the world’s leader on environmental issues, but under a framework that is fair and where the burdens and responsibilities are equally shared among the many nations all around the world.

No responsible leader can put the workers — and the people — of their country at this debilitating and tremendous disadvantage. The fact that the Paris deal hamstrings the United States, while empowering some of the world’s top polluting countries, should dispel any doubt as to the real reason why foreign lobbyists wish to keep our magnificent country tied up and bound down by this agreement: It’s to give their country an economic edge over the United States. That’s not going to happen while I’m President. I’m sorry. (Applause.)

My job as President is to do everything within my power to give America a level playing field and to create the economic, regulatory and tax structures that make America the most prosperous and productive country on Earth, and with the highest standard of living and the highest standard of environmental protection. Our tax bill is moving along in Congress, and I believe it’s doing very well. I think a lot of people will be very pleasantly surprised. The Republicans are working very, very hard. We’d love to have support from the Democrats, but we may have to go it alone. But it’s going very well.

The Paris Agreement handicaps the United States economy in order to win praise from the very foreign capitals and global activists that have long sought to gain wealth at our country’s expense. They don’t put America first. I do, and I always will. (Applause.)

The same nations asking us to stay in the agreement are the countries that have collectively cost America trillions of dollars through tough trade practices and, in many cases, lax contributions to our critical military alliance. You see what’s happening. It’s pretty obvious to those that want to keep an open mind.

At what point does America get demeaned? At what point do they start laughing at us as a country? We want fair treatment for its citizens, and we want fair treatment for our taxpayers. We don’t want other leaders and other countries laughing at us anymore. And they won’t be. They won’t be.

I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris.. (Applause.) I promised I would exit or renegotiate any deal which fails to serve America’s interests. Many trade deals will soon be under renegotiation. Very rarely do we have a deal that works for this country, but they’ll soon be under renegotiation. The process has begun from day one. But now we’re down to business.

Beyond the severe energy restrictions inflicted by the Paris Accord, it includes yet another scheme to redistribute wealth out of the United States through the so-called Green Climate Fund — nice name — which calls for developed countries to send $100 billion to developing countries all on top of America’s existing and massive foreign aid payments. So we’re going to be paying billions and billions and billions of dollars, and we’re already way ahead of anybody else. Many of the other countries haven’t spent anything, and many of them will never pay one dime.

The Green Fund would likely obligate the United States to commit potentially tens of billions of dollars of which the United States has already handed over $1 billion — nobody else is even close; most of them haven’t even paid anything — including funds raided out of America’s budget for the war against terrorism. That’s where they came. Believe me, they didn’t come from me. They came just before I came into office. Not good. And not good the way they took the money.

In 2015, the United Nation’s departing top climate officials reportedly described the $100 billion per year as “peanuts,” and stated that “the $100 billion is the tail that wags the dog.” In 2015, the Green Climate Fund’s executive director reportedly stated that estimated funding needed would increase to $450 billion per year after 2020. And nobody even knows where the money is going to. Nobody has been able to say, where is it going to?

Of course, the world’s top polluters have no affirmative obligations under the Green Fund, which we terminated. America is $20 trillion in debt. Cash-strapped cities cannot hire enough police officers or fix vital infrastructure. Millions of our citizens are out of work. And yet, under the Paris Accord, billions of dollars that ought to be invested right here in America will be sent to the very countries that have taken our factories and our jobs away from us. So think of that.

There are serious legal and constitutional issues as well. Foreign leaders in Europe, Asia, and across the world should not have more to say with respect to the U.S. economy than our own citizens and their elected representatives. Thus, our withdrawal from the agreement represents a reassertion of America’s sovereignty. (Applause.) Our Constitution is unique among all the nations of the world, and it is my highest obligation and greatest honor to protect it. And I will.

Staying in the agreement could also pose serious obstacles for the United States as we begin the process of unlocking the restrictions on America’s abundant energy reserves, which we have started very strongly. It would once have been unthinkable that an international agreement could prevent the United States from conducting its own domestic economic affairs, but this is the new reality we face if we do not leave the agreement or if we do not negotiate a far better deal. The risks grow as historically these agreements only tend to become more and more ambitious over time. In other words, the Paris framework is a starting point — as bad as it is — not an end point. And exiting the agreement protects the United States from future intrusions on the United States’ sovereignty and massive future legal liability. Believe me, we have massive legal liability if we stay in. As President, I have one obligation, and that obligation is to the American people. The Paris Accord would undermine our economy, hamstring our workers, weaken our sovereignty, impose unacceptable legal risks, and put us at a permanent disadvantage to the other countries of the world. It is time to exit the Paris Accord — (applause) — and time to pursue a new deal that protects the environment, our companies, our citizens, and our country.

It is time to put Youngstown, Ohio, Detroit, Michigan, and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania — along with many, many other locations within our great country — before Paris, France. It is time to make America great again. (Applause.) Thank you. Thank you. Thank you very much.

Those areas in bold red are why. But the large, bolded, red, and underlined passage is PRECISELY why I want Trump back in office.

I almost fell out of my chair when I heard him publicly, in front of the world, declare "Climate Change" a wealth redistribution scheme! THAT is why we need him in the Oval Office.

The climate spell is lifting. What to do with the generation that had the God Gaia poised upon it. They will need serious therapy.

Been a while since I posted this. This is the kind of graph that climatologists (even NASA) made before climatology got so bastardized by the political class. The Modern Warm Period that we're in isn't unique or bad. It's a good time to be alive.

Carney from canada is reversing his prior hardline stance.

His company, brookfield, needs to make money.

Carney struck a deal with Alberta to help out Brookfield.
Spin off benefits.
Oil pipeline to Pacific coast gets federal support.
“NetZero” rules changed
Alberta has the greenlight to sell unlimited volumes of natural gas, fuel needed to heat homes and generate electricity for AI data centers.

Priorities now dictate removal of green regulations

"...I believe the climates a little, like from time to time, but think it is probably temporary..."

What you said is key. WE who oppose the rubric of "Climate Change" in its man-caused, alarmist sense, understand this.

WE understand that the climate DOES change, and does it NATURALLY, in the context of various factors, some known, some unknown.
WE can acknowledge that climate DOES change, and at this time, may even be warmer on average than it may have been at any point since the 1930's in North America.
WE do not deny that it is possible that man contributes to this in some small way, but we view our involvement in the global change as small and not significant over all.
WE do not believe that any measures we take to decrease overall CO2 levels in the atmosphere are going to contribute to overall decrease in global temperatures in time.
WE believe that our efforts should be to adapt to whatever change in climate does occur, because this is what humans have done since we walked on the face of the Earth. If it gets colder, we move or adapt. If it gets warmer, we move and adapt.
WE believe that money spent on trying to CHANGE the global climate to STAY at one single climate state because it is what are in right now is absurd, fruitless, and a waste of money.
WE believe, as President Donald Trump stated, that the "Climate Change Alarmist" point of view is all about power for globalists and redistribution of wealth from wealthier countries to poorer countries, and NOT about anything to actually do with climate.

As Conservatives, this is a well reasoned, and rational response to "Climate Change Alarmists", and if current events are indicative, we were right all along, and they now, grudgingly, acknowledge just that.

They can do nothing else. To continue down their road as they did, with catastrophic predictions failing, year after year, puts them in the position of being ridiculed in exactly the same way society has traditionally ridiculed those people who walk the streets ringing a bell, with a sandwich board proclaiming "The End Is Near" and day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year, and decade after decade, their dire shouted predictions fail to come true.

They had no choice but to abandon it. We were right all along, and only the idiological idiots failed to see the truth in that. And now that their biggest mouthpieces, the monolithic Main Stream Media is loosing its grip on the dissemination of information due to the democratization of Information on the Internet, they have to come to grips with their failure.

President Donald J. Trump was a key element in making this all happen. We should be thankful for his presence on the world stage, and many of us...are.

This does not mean that there are no environmental effects of anthropogenic carbon dioxide. Some are beneficial, such as more productive crops, others are costly, such as 20-60% rate of increase in the accrual of fuels in forests and the consequent reduction in available water. These are demonstrable and quantifiable. The existing offset market should be rededicated to an honest system funding mitigations of these costs.

I quitclaimed my patent on a business method to monetize such a market.

Carney is presiding over the breakup of Canada.

How I wish I had a gas stove.

The governments that bought and are still buying EV crap like Buses and Passenger Ferries have no clue about the massive infrastructure they have to build to keep the crap going and they really don’t care it’s taxpayer money and they can grab all they want

Carney is making deals but the deals are to make his friend richer

BINGO!

It’s always been about the few controlling the many. Fear of climate doom wasn’t working anymore. Now they have AI and data centers to control the world. Climate change doom is no longer needed.