Posted on 04/14/2026 10:35:11 AM PDT by MtnClimber
Meanwhile, foreign Islamists meeting “residency” requirements receive taxpayer assistance.
Andreas Wailzer at LifeSite News reports that the German government, through the Ministry of Construction, has just proposed a new bill that “would give municipalities the right of first refusal if a potential buyer of property has ‘anti-constitutional aspirations.’”
But those with “anti-constitutional aspirations” aren’t to be confused with the third-world foreigners and hordes of Islamists who have decidedly not integrated and accepted the German constitution and government as authoritative, instead bringing sharia culture, customs, and pseudo-law to Germany and making no pretenses of hiding their intentions—this is specifically in regards to “right-wingers.” Sure, the bill’s language includes a spate of other problematic identities (“left-wing” and “religiously motivated extremist” ideologues), but it singles out the “right-wingers” and elaborates thusly:
The proposed legislation states: ‘They have long been well-documented as a right-wing extremist strategy for gaining a foothold in communities. Prominent examples have been, and continue to be, Dortmund-Dorstfeld and the village of Jamel. Their dominance in these areas is no coincidence, but part of a far-right strategy. Guidelines on preventing far-right extremism consistently emphasize the importance of involving and mobilizing the local population. However, at a certain point, civil society initiatives can no longer provide a sufficient counterbalance, which can further promote the segregation of the resident population.’
(If you didn’t know any better, you’d think they were literally talking about the Islamists currently conquering all of Europe.)
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Europe is gone. The citizens were not vigilant and the politicians they elected hate their own countries.
This is what I expect from that terrible country and its inhabitants.
We could take back California in about five minutes.
“the Ministry of Construction, has just proposed a new bill that “would give municipalities the right of first refusal if a potential buyer of property has ‘anti-constitutional aspirations.’” “
Geotge Orwell is jealous he didn’t of this one.
I wonder how they’re going to determine if you have ‘anti-constitutional aspirations.’?
US Dems: Darn, why didn’t we think of that? Let’s get on it.
It’s an understatement that the Europeans lack the slightest sophistication or morality when it comes to people’s liberties.
Of course we have a piece of garbage democrat party here which no longer has any respect for societal norms or people’s rights either.
This business about supposed anti-constitution beliefs.
I’ve told the story before that I studied under a renowned expert on drafting constitutions. Because he was a Jew who survived the Holocaust he gave third world countries constitutions that outlawed any political party that held viewpoints in opposition to the rights contained in the constitution.
He admitted that he watched as one by one all of those countries used that provision in the Constitution to establish dictatorships.
This is why another renowned moron named Barack Obama had his head up his butt when he complained that our constitution only consists of “negative rights”.
Leftist scum have no realization or otherwise no concern about the fact governments will use any capability you give them to oppress people.
The one success that governments of all stripes have is the suppression of far-right movements. Of all the possible threats to democracy far right extremism is the one that they have had the most success with.
They just like the money and grift more and don’t give a crap about their culture at least not more than the $$$$ they are making.
There were reasons why the Trump family moved out of Germany.
“the Ministry of Construction, has just proposed a new bill”
The key word is Proposed.
They are terrified of the votes the AfD Party are getting. :)
Excellent.
There is a news report that the German government, through the Ministry of Construction, has just proposed a new bill that “would give municipalities the right of first refusal if a potential buyer of property has ‘anti-constitutional aspirations.’”
How does the right of first refusal relate to a long history of law and custom, through "the Trustee Family" concept in "Family and Civilization" of Carle Clark Zimmerman, back to the account in the Biblical Book of Ruth of property rights claimant Boaz, and how did this concept develop in the Code of Justinian, the Roman Twelve Tables of the Law and the Code of Hammurabi?
A right of first refusal sits inside a very old legal idea: land is not merely a commodity, but a trust embedded in family, kin, and polity. In that older view, ownership is not absolute in the modern market sense. It is layered. A holder may possess and use land, but others — kin, co-heirs, neighbors, the city, the sovereign — may have a prior moral or legal claim to keep it from passing into alien hands.
That is close to what Zimmerman was getting at with the “trustee family” idea in Family and Civilization: the family is not just a collection of consumers but a continuing corporate body, holding property across generations. In that framework, property is stewarded, not merely spent. A preemptive purchase right preserves the family line, household continuity, and the social order built around them. A right of first refusal is thus a market-era survival of a much older rule: before land leaves the moral community to which it belongs, those nearest to it get the first chance to reclaim or keep it.
That same logic appears in Ruth. Boaz is not just a bidder in an open market. He acts within a redemption structure: there is a nearer kinsman who has the prior claim, and only after that man declines does Boaz step in. The point is not free alienability; the point is that land and lineage are tied together, and a kinsman-redeemer has precedence. That is very close in spirit to later rights of preemption: the nearest legitimate claimant gets first option.
In the Roman world, the same broad instinct developed in more juristic form. The Twelve Tables were early and severe, but they already assumed that family property stood inside an agnatic order: household continuity mattered more than abstract individual autonomy. Roman law did not yet state a modern “right of first refusal” in those exact words, but it strongly tied inheritance, guardianship, and property transmission to the family line. Over time, especially in the later imperial and Byzantine tradition, Roman law became more explicit about preemption and redemption rights in co-ownership, emphyteusis, neighborhood relations, and family settlement. By the Justinianic period, the legal order had become much more systematic about ranking claims and preserving existing relational interests before sale to outsiders. The mature Roman tradition thus helped turn a customary kin-first instinct into a more technical legal doctrine.
In the Code of Hammurabi, the pattern is older and harsher, but familiar. Land, house, debt, marriage, and inheritance are treated as parts of a single household order. The code is deeply concerned with keeping patrimonial assets within the family and regulating transfer when distress, debt, widowhood, or orphanhood threaten the household. Again, one does not find the exact modern real-estate phrase, but one does find the same civilization-forming principle: property transfer is constrained by prior duties to family continuity and social rank.
So the long arc looks like this:
So, in that light, a modern municipal right of first refusal is structurally similar, though not morally identical. It takes an old form — priority to an incumbent community claimant before transfer to a disfavored outsider — and transfers it from kinship and household to the state or municipality.
That is the crucial shift. Historically, preemption usually protected:
In the modern administrative state, the same legal mechanism can be repurposed to protect not the family trust, but the ideological trust of the regime. The form is ancient; the beneficiary has changed.
“ Europe is gone. The citizens were not vigilant and the politicians they elected hate their own countries.”
Coming to Texas
People are so rabid against Trump, the only person doing anything about this, that they’re completely ignoring their own responsibilities to protect the constitution
Emphyteusis (Greek, 'implanting') or emphyteutic lease is a contract for land that allows the holder the right to the enjoyment of a property, often in perpetuity, on condition of proper care, payment of tax, and rent. This type of real estate contract specifies that the lessee must improve the property for the nation or for its population, for example through construction of a railway service perhaps or by farming the land to create produce, as happened in Mauritius where the population was starving. The term is commonly used in Quebec, Belgium and France and its ex-colonies. This kind of lease is usually associated with government lands or government properties.
Didn’t Angela Merkel admit that she let waves of Mohammadan immigrants in to stop “the right” ? Demographic replacement.
Yes, in an interview she stated that is why she admitted the hoards of immigrants. It was to prevent a right wing candidate from ever being able to get elected.
So basically, in order to thwart people who want to hold on to the past, she let in millions of people who live in the stone age. Makes total sense.
Two world wars wiped out the testosterone on that continent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.