Posted on 04/11/2026 4:53:42 AM PDT by MtnClimber
The dust of conflict has settled. The fever of the moment has yielded to the cooler discipline of strategic reflection. It is time to ask, with unflinching clarity, what the United States and its partners should do with the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Tehran’s propaganda organs were quick to claim victory. That claim, however theatrical, must be taken seriously -- not because it reflects battlefield reality, but because it reveals an uncomfortable truth: the regime cannot, or will not, abandon the terrorist and extremist doctrines that have defined it for more than four decades. No amount of quiet concessions extracted in back-channel talks can alter the fact that its public posture remains implacable. Neither the nations of the region nor the broader international community can any longer pretend that peaceful coexistence with this regime is possible.
The war just concluded exposed a secret weapon the regime had wielded against the international community for years: our own ignorance of its internal workings. We had imagined its strength lay in hardware -- missiles, drones, a navy, an air force, a nuclear program. Within weeks those assets were largely neutralized. Its proxy network, once menacing, lies shattered and operationally crippled. Yet the regime’s real power was never hard; it was soft. It was the architecture of influence quietly embedded in our own societies: proxies operating inside think tanks, newsrooms, and foreign-policy circles, often cloaked in the respectable garb of “Iran experts” or “opposition voices.” These networks do not fire rockets. They shape narratives. They steer decisions.
For two decades the West invested heavily in the comforting narrative peddled by these same experts: that “moderates” existed inside the regime, pragmatic figures who could be engaged, moderated, and ultimately steered toward reform. The very individuals held up as proof of this moderation later boasted
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Our leftist politicians will believe the lies.
and several on this forum as well ...
“We do not seek a fractured Iran that becomes a new theater of regional chaos;”
What “we” you talking about Willis?
If the fractured regions do not project terrorism, build atom bombs or control the Strait, I’m in.
This guy is pro MEK, so no surprise, he doesn’t like Pahlavi. He’s a supporter of the cult of Rajavi.
” “Tehran is desperately seeking Western journalists and media outlets that can be persuaded to smear the MEK, in conjunction with a widespread campaign to manipulate Facebook and Twitter.”
“ “The MEK and its parent coalition, the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), led by the charismatic Maryam Rajavi, offers a viable democratic alternative,” claims Dr. Rafizadeh.”
American Thinker was long ago infiltrated by MEK.
The headline says we need to be wary of Iran’s propaganda machine.
It sounds like the bigger problem is OUR propaganda machine.
I see them throughout every Hollywood production.
The democratic party and their media lackeys.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.