Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 03/26/2026 1:23:42 AM PDT by Morgana
As a first-time mom expecting a baby this September, my social media feed has completely changed. What used to be filled with news and politics is now full of pregnancy advice, nursery ideas, and – of course – ads for diapers.
However, I didn’t expect that preparing for my baby would lead me to discover something deeply disturbing about the diaper industry.
Like most parents, I assumed choosing a diaper brand would come down to comfort, quality, and price. The last thing I expected was to learn that many of the most recognizable diaper brands in America have publicly aligned themselves with the abortion industry.
But the more I looked into it, the worse it got.
After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, Procter & Gamble – the company behind Pampers and Luvs – expanded employee healthcare coverage to include travel for abortions. Meanwhile, Kimberly-Clark, the manufacturer of Huggies, has been matching employee contributions to Planned Parenthood for two decades.
Other companies have taken similar positions. The Honest Company has also pledged to ensure employees can access an abortion “regardless of where they live,” including transportation to another state. Hello Bello has promised to help cover costs and provide paid time off for employees travelling for an abortion.
Even newer premium diaper brands have weighed in. After the Roe decision, Coterie publicly posted that it felt “lost” without abortion access and framed abortion as essential to reproductive freedom.
As a mom-to-be, discovering this wasn’t just surprising – it was deeply unsettling.
I’m currently carrying a child I already love more than words can describe. Every doctor’s appointment and ultrasound remind me that life is not abstract. It’s precious. It’s a miracle.
When you’ve seen your baby move on a screen and heard their heartbeat, abortion stops being a political talking point. It becomes a question of protecting a human life.
The irony is impossible to ignore. These companies exist because babies exist, yet many have chosen to support organizations dedicated to ending unborn lives.
Companies built on babies shouldn’t be funding the destruction of unborn life.
Parents want to make the best choices for their children. But most have no idea that the diaper brands they rely on are also taking strong political positions about abortion.
And that’s where the dilemma begins.
Because diapers aren’t optional. Every parent needs them.
Discovering that so many major brands support abortion leaves pro-life parents facing a dilemma they should never have to face: whether buying a basic necessity for their baby also means supporting an industry that destroys life.
That is why alternatives matter. EveryLife, for example, has positioned itself as an explicitly pro-life diaper company and supports Pregnancy Resource Centers. It may not yet be as widely available in stores as the major brands, but its existence shows that parents are not wrong for wanting baby products that align with their values.
Choosing to become a parent means protecting life, nurturing it, and fighting for it.
That’s why this issue matters so deeply – and why the work of the ACLJ matters right now.
While massive corporations and powerful advocacy groups continue pushing abortion access as a “right,” the ACLJ is actively fighting to defund Planned Parenthood, battling a taxpayer-funded smear campaign against pro-life centers, and preserving pro-life laws nationwide.
The fight for life didn’t end with the fall of Roe v. Wade. In many ways, it has only intensified.
But people are still willing to take up that fight.
Because every child deserves to be protected.
LifeNews Note: This article was written by Erin Mills, ACLJ Social Media Manager.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
I have no reason not to believe the info in the article, but it doesn’t make sense. More babies’ butts = more sales.
Why would teachers unions support abortion? More kids means more schools and more teachers needed. Yet teachers union support abortion.
Look at how many schools we lost since 1973.
Teachers see the good side and bad side of marriages. Many teachers support family planning. They know spacing years between children mean parents will have the time and funds to take better care of each child. A college education for children born 3 or 4 years apart is much more likely than for children spaced 2 years or less. Planned Parenthood uses 97% of its funds promoting women’s health. The other 3% can be used for activities that may end up with abortion.
My two sons had been married several years and there was only one grandchild. They had not been able to save much money and had no immediate plans for one. They could only afford a decent one bedroom apartment. I offered to give them each $10,000 toward a house financed by my equity line of credit. They each bought a 3 bedroom fixer-upper. This was in 2000 and I now have 4 grandchildren 18 or older.
Not everyone has the resources to plan success. Some plan very poorly and some have really bad luck which might make an abortion a sad but wise decision, for one or both parents or for the sake of existing children. For example consider the wife with an alcoholic husband who already has children and knows another one will make the situation much worse. But her husband comes home drunk regularly, insists on sex and won’t use protection. Should she chose an abortion to help her existing children or bring a new child into a really bad situation? More violence, greater poverty, more exhaustion and neglect of children’s basic needs and help with homework and decent clothes.
p
My gut feeling is Pampers and Luvs and probably manufactured in a unionized, strong Democrat loving city, and maybe a strong Democrat loving State and the Democrats are bending the arm of the Company to support Abortion or something like that. The Democrats act like the Mafia they are always strong arming companies and individuals to support them or else they will attempt to bring the companies down.
“Why would teachers unions support abortion?”
Because abortion is one of their main sacraments. Educating students is not a priority nor a sacrament.
Well, at least some don’t automatically just selfishly prop up anything that supports “jobs!” As commie unions usually do….
long-term contraception is available - implants, IUDs
Their corporate leaders love Satan more than profits.
You are looking at the micro and not the macro.
These are Fortune 500 companies, diapers are only a small part of their business.
On the macro scale these companies are part of the Globalist elite mentality that sees human being as interchangeable/consumable parts that have less and less utility as Automation and AI grow in utility.
The One World Government says that we need fewer human beings.
The multinational corporations receive their marching orders to facilitate abortions as a matter of policy.
In some nations such as Canada euthanasia is being pushed hard.
Human lives are not valued as much as they used to be as a matter of policy.
Cloth diapers don’t.
buy cloth diapers and get a pail.
P & G and Kimberly-Clark are evil companies. I tried to avoid those two companies...
Bingo! Educating students is not in the functional job description of the unions.
It is important here to separate individual teachers from the unions.
The former are the useful idiots of the latter who are, in most cases, the useful idiots of the left.
Do these companies desire ideally to put themselves out of business?
Excess children should be disposed of? Make your life more convenient by killing people? If babies are okay to kill, why not inconvenient neighbors?
It’s like homos supporting Islam.
Contraception is the father of abortion and other left-wing anti life manias.
P&G is based in Ohio (where abortion is a constitutional rights).
But Kimberly-Clark doing this while based in Texas? You wonder if ObamaCare mandates in states where they produce are forcing this.
ObamaCare pushes abortion mandates. There comes a consequence when a factory is based in a state where the ACA law mandates such coverage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.