Posted on 03/24/2026 11:31:25 AM PDT by simpson96
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said that a legal theory supported by the Republican National Committee in a case related to mail-in ballots “imperils a lot of different things.”
Jackson noted during oral arguments in the case on Monday that election practices have changed over time, which she said undermines the idea that there was ever a consistent practice across all states.
“It's been changing throughout the course in a way that undermines the notion that there was one consistent practice first of all, or that Congress's law, the meaning of Election Day in the federal statutes, somehow was tied to what the state's practices were about that,” Jackson said. “I mean, I think this is your original point that there were lots of different practices and so to the extent we're saying, ‘oh, you could only look at Election Day in the federal statute to mean exactly what the states were doing back at that time.’ This imperils a lot of different things, not just post-Election Day ballot deadlines.”
(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...
I want her to keep on speaking... every time she spills another salad bar of words, she has to make her fellow liberals think twice about agreeing with her bizarre legal gymnastics.
If you mess up on a late IRS submission, they will correct it for you and you will owe what they say.
If you fraudulently enter late ballots in a vote, on the other hand, there is NO REMEDY. The cheater takes office.
Idiots like Brown should never be allowed anywhere near a ballot box OR A BALLOT. Voting is for grownups with some intelligence. She doesn’t fit the mold.
Yes. It is important to traitors like Brown that voter fraud be kept alive and widespread.
My English professsors forbade the use of “a lot.”
In important sppeech and writing, it is trite, non-professional, and used by people like Ketanji Brown.
Suggested correction: “DIMocRAT held” should read “DIMocRAT stolen”.
What's the problem, Jumanji? It imperils electoral fraud ...
I feel like I don’t need to look up how many times Scalia used the phrase, “I mean, ...”
This is not even a word salad. It’s more like a word compost pile.
Since she is too stupid to know what a woman was and admitted it, I agree. She shouldn’t be on the court.
Yes. You get my vote for winning the internet today.
“Tell me you’re an imbecile without telling me you’re an imbecile”
She could be telling a lot of different things without telling us different hopes.
She had absolutely every single qualification that Biden required,,,,,,,she was female and she was black.
Those were the exact high qualifications to be Biden’s VP also.
This is Joe Biden’s legacy to the Court/Country!
Incompetence!
She’s in over her head. She’d do better as a waitress at an Omelet and Pork Chop Shack along some highway in the south.
It imperils cheating. My God how can we survive as a party without vote fraud!
Wow, that’s deep... (eyeroll)
I mean, there were justices you don’t have to agree with...but they did not sound like imbeciles. This woman is an imbecile.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.