Do you hear what circular reasoning you’re using? The evidence of fraud must be a stupid mistake because if there was fraud the people benefitting from the fraud (politicians) would have stuck their necks out to bite the very hand that feeds them.
If there really is fraud that is benefitting the politicians (like getting illegals to pad the voter rolls so their elections can be stolen) it makes perfect sense that the politicians won’t do anything about the fraud.
But the question of whether there is fraud depends totally on the evidence, which you haven’t seen or can’t understand. Neither have I or can I. But we’ve got video footage of “learing centers” that have no kids and all kinds of other fraud - in HUGE monetary amounts that was being aided and abetted by politicians and their bureaucrat office workers. Given all that, there’s no way I in my unprivileged position with no access to the data would accuse the DOGE guys of being too stupid to understand what is and isn’t fraud.
BWAHAHAHAHA. Wow there’s some circular reasoning “the fraud must have been real, because if it wasn’t real the politicians wouldn’t have ignored it”. Keeping in mind of course if the fraud WAS real we wouldn’t be relying on politicians to do anything, Trump’s Justice Department would.