Exclusive — ‘Non-Credible Accusations’: Epstein Files ‘Trump Accuser’ Claims Collapse Under Scrutiny

Breitbart ^ | 25 Feb 2026 | Matthew Boyle

[Skwor]

WASHINGTON — Allegations made in FBI interview documents by a woman against President Donald Trump, as revealed by NPR and the New York Times, are coming under scrutiny.

---

TOPICS: Conspiracy; Society
KEYWORDS: dailyepstein; epstein; epsteinfiles; trump

[Skwor]

Just another lie told by NPR and the NY Slimes. Funny how some here at FR still believe in these hack propogandists.

[Az Joe]

NPR real sore thatTrump got their funding finally cut off.

This hoax “story” is their “revenge”.

It impossible to detest the media enough.

[stockpirate]

Almost as bad as those here who trust the FBI, CIA, DOJ, Congress and the courts.

[skr]

Just Jeff, no last name? How much did he pay her despicable mother? Is her mother charged with anything? I wouldn’t be surprised that it’s Epstein, but Jeff isn’t an uncommon name either. How are any cases to be made from such vague testimony?

[Skwor]

Literally the point of such testimony, just enough to allow an accusation but not enough to be held accountable for the lies.

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

Hard to believe but they’ve been pulling this crap against Trump for 11 years now. It was June 2015 - soon to be 11 years ago — when Trump first came down the escalator to announce his candidacy for POTUS, can you believe it?

My point being is this man has had every single atom of his life turned over for those 11 years, examined with an electron microscope and what has they got? NOTHING NOTHING NOTHING! For ELEVEN YEARS NOTHING! When the hell are they going to give it a rest?

[Skwor]

I see it as a literal miracle from God that Trump has lived a life so resistant to that kind of scrutiny.

In my opinion most of us could not expose our lives and walk away as clean as he has, and he did it as a NY Real Estate mogul, literally AMAZING!

[Vermont Lt]

The thing that sucks is that Breitbart is not going to be seen as unbiased by a lot of people. The fact that they have “exclusive” access to confidential documents is nuts.

Redact the name and release the documents.

This all supports Trumps position. But the process is sloppy and does nothing the get rid of the story. I don’t understand why they are screwimg this up so badly.

[Skwor]

I do not even disagree that Breitbart is biased, of course they are conservatively slanted.

To me the bigger issue comes from the lying, intentional anonymous sources that obviously do not exist, flat out false facts front page only later corrected after months and then buried back page etc.

I expect and not offended when a story is presented with the relevant facts (btw fact omission is of course still lying) and then the article takes a right or left slant, everyone needs to learn how to read through such bias.

[phil00071]

A quick review of YouTube reveals that this story is being spread by a lot of local news stations across the country.

[MrRelevant]

Please…. All this still falls under…. if was worth anything to the left it wouldve been smeared all over the papers in 2020,2021,2022,2023 or even 2024 but not 2026, sorry. They had these files to comb over for 4 years which I am sure they didi and sat on the findings because they know Trump is clean.

[Skwor]

Yep, intended to create a narrative and smear, none of it was about reporting any news.

[A_perfect_lady]

I have found that an easy and fun way to infuriate lefties waving these accusations about Trump from the 1980s and 1990s is to calmly say, "Oh, they're probably true, because he was a Democrat back then, and that's how Democrats are. But now that he's a Republican, he doesn't do that sort of thing anymore, so it just doesn't count."

I just repeat that over and over. "Yeah, but he was a Democrat then. That's how Democrats are. This proves it, in fact." (It's not even that I believe that, necessarily, just that it leaves them nowhere to go.)

[ConservativeMind]

Nicely done.