Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Skwor

The thing that sucks is that Breitbart is not going to be seen as unbiased by a lot of people. The fact that they have “exclusive” access to confidential documents is nuts.

Redact the name and release the documents.

This all supports Trumps position. But the process is sloppy and does nothing the get rid of the story. I don’t understand why they are screwimg this up so badly.


8 posted on 02/26/2026 3:21:38 AM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vermont Lt

I do not even disagree that Breitbart is biased, of course they are conservatively slanted.

To me the bigger issue comes from the lying, intentional anonymous sources that obviously do not exist, flat out false facts front page only later corrected after months and then buried back page etc.

I expect and not offended when a story is presented with the relevant facts (btw fact omission is of course still lying) and then the article takes a right or left slant, everyone needs to learn how to read through such bias.


9 posted on 02/26/2026 3:28:10 AM PST by Skwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson