Assuming what Trump said is at least remotely accurate, and the receipts are provided that indeed show foreign influence can be shown to be directing the decisions of Supreme Court justices, perhaps even direct evidence on several critical cases. Furthermore, its not refuted, and Congress refuses to act on that information?
What then?
Assuming what Trump said is at least remotely accurate, and the receipts are provided that indeed show foreign influence can be shown to be directing the decisions of Supreme Court justices, perhaps even direct evidence on several critical cases. Furthermore, its not refuted, and Congress refuses to act on that information?
What then?
.......
One option is hanging on the Oval Office wall
I’m not a lawyer. But especially considering that John Solomo is reporting that the foreign manipulation of election systems is about to be exposed, I think this will be proof that the entire us government has been taken over by hostile belligerents. That is the threshold for the .military to step in, re.ove the belligerent, and restore legitimate constitutional government
If any of that was true, the admin would keep on allowing scotus to rule on stuff or hear it? Countless cases would be compromised.
“Just for the sake of argument:
Assuming what Trump said is at least remotely accurate, and the receipts are provided that indeed show foreign influence can be shown to be directing the decisions of Supreme Court justices, perhaps even direct evidence on several critical cases. Furthermore, its not refuted, and Congress refuses to act on that information?
What then?”
___________________________________________________________
The method for removing a Supreme Court Justice is the same as for removing a president. The party in majority in the House must first pass a bill of impeachment by a simple majority. It then goes to the Senate for trial.
If a Justice is impeached and convicted, they are automatically removed from the office and then subject to whatever criminal laws may apply.