Posted on 02/03/2026 11:03:46 AM PST by deks
Good morning everyone, I'm here in the office and some people are concerned about something I said yesterday, so I want to be crystal clear. I am a proud supporter of the second amendment. I have guns myself, long guns, handguns, and I'm a proud high-heeled gun owner. In fact, I even keynoted an NRA convention.
However, you need to be responsible, and every responsible gun owner that I know makes sure that they understand the laws where they are going and understand whatever registration requirements there might be.
President Trump's goal here, and my goal as well, is to make sure we take guns out of the hands of criminals. There is a reason we have the lowest homicide rate in recorded history. We're taking guns off the street, illegal guns in the hands of criminals, who want to use those guns to victimize law abiding citizens.
There's a big difference here -- you're responsible, you follow the laws, you're not going to have a problem with me.
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
An article posted here early this morning generated a lot interest and debate on Pirro's statement from yesterday about not bringing guns into D.C.
The U.S. Attorney for D.C. holds a unique dual role - serving as the chief federal prosecutor for federal crimes in D.C., and also serving as the chief prosecutor for local D.C. municipal crimes, including violations of D.C. Code gun laws. This is because D.C. is not a state and lacks its own elected district attorney or state-level prosecutor's office.
When traveling it's nigh impossible to know all of the state and local gun laws that can get you arrested. Gun laws are all different depending on where you are.
My personal desire is for constitutional carry to be enacted for the entire U.S., and when illegals are removed from blue states and cities and not counted for apportionment of congressional districts, I think we'll have a chance of passing legislation to that effect.
Ok we can move on. What is hilarious is the lefts knee jerk attempt to paint these decontextualized statements as ammo against Trump and the GOP make them pro gun advocates😂😂😂
Some light for those eagerly jumping on every opportunity to give up and encourage others to do so.
Tick tock. She’s done.
My message to Pirro.....
Read the Second Amendment
*
Some will say that she should ignore the DC gun laws because they are unconstitutional. Legislation or the supreme court may need to be involved before she can do that.
In the mean time I think she is obligated to enforce the existing law, and she is doing an excellent job of it, as far as I can see.
All actual laws for Washington DC are made by Congress.
In a non-occupied country, the Attorney General would have filed suit years ago.
The statement “All actual laws for Washington DC are made by Congress” is inaccurate and oversimplifies the District’s unique governance structure under the U.S. Constitution. While Congress retains ultimate authority over Washington, D.C. (as a federal district rather than a state), the majority of local laws—including those comprising the D.C. Code and the District’s restrictive gun regulations—are enacted by the locally elected D.C. Council and mayor, subject to passive Congressional review.
Hey Jeanine!
“... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
How ‘bout y’all focus on that?
“””My message to Pirro.....
Read the Second Amendment””””
My message to you.
She doesn’t pass the laws. She enforces the ones she has in front of her.
In the video, starting at 2:13, she shows just how little she cares about the inalienable right to keep and bear arms.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VsNhy-Rct4
Yeah... about that "Sanctuary City" thing...
“President Trump’s goal here, and my goal as well, is to make sure we take guns out of the hands of criminals.” No problem judge, not a criminal but I might be...ran through a stop light when it was yellow.
Highly doubtful, noobie 😉
Absolute BS. Liberal judges do not enforce laws they disagree with. They are not obligated to do so and are never impeached for it. She too has discretion and can say she won’t enforce anti-Constitional laws. She blew it showing her true anti 2A colors.
I detest red light cameras, as they actually make the intersection more dangerous causing someone to plow into the back of you when you jam on the brakes to avoid a ticket.
I know that some of them were removed in Virginia when this was proven to be a hazard. DC and Maryland are infested with them making millions from even one camera [verified]. It's a money making scam.
She's not going to resign because of what she said, it's that she said it out loud. You don't give away the con.
She now also has the internal vote of no-confidence. If she can't control herself and keep her yap shut, she's a liability.
Let’s keep up the debate. We need movement on 2A rights ASAP.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.