
Add looney toons crazy to the mix of motivations.
Whom is this about?
He’s a simp for whatever DC says. And he was just a Special Forces man. He is an amateur when it comes to murder investigations and the law.
And I notice he doesn’t refute her points, he just says a friend wouldn’t do that. I’ll tell you what a friend wouldn’t do, they wouldn’t stay silent about the strange problems in this case.
And if we want to talk about odd behaviors, his wife has acting strange in my opinion. So have more than a few of his staffers. They are way more worried about protecting Israel than the murder.
When Candace Owens is going out of her way to make Alex Jones look sane, it is entirely reasonable to question her motivations for trying to destroy Charlie Kirk's legacy.
Candace Owens is the Rachel Maddow of the Right.
#1 It’s free speech.
#2 No one has successfully sued her for defamation and won.
#3 It’s entertaining.
#4 The “government” account of the murder is total Horse-shit!
“Candace, if you feel that taking money from The Daily Wire somehow comes between you and God, by all means quit.”
That pulled the rug out from under her and husband, the former showrunner for UK Turning Point. He proposed 18 days after they met, and cranked out 4 kids in 7 years. Mazeltov lol.
The prelude is Owens posted to X in March 2024, "I would stake my entire professional reputation on the fact that Brigitte Macron is, in fact, a man."
Misguided is the best word for that, hoopdie-stupid is more honest.
When Shapiro failed to shield her or fade the heat from the blowback and the inbound lawsuit, the jig was up.
But everyone in the aura farming bidness is fully aware of the Alex Jones model: create outrageously false witness -- 9th Commandment be damned -- for filthy lucre, be successfully sued in court for libel, Chapter 11/7 yourself in a friendly bankruptcy court that prevents the sale of your assets, and rinse/work up another lather/repeat.