To: Republican Wildcat
He’s a simp for whatever DC says. And he was just a Special Forces man. He is an amateur when it comes to murder investigations and the law.
And I notice he doesn’t refute her points, he just says a friend wouldn’t do that. I’ll tell you what a friend wouldn’t do, they wouldn’t stay silent about the strange problems in this case.
And if we want to talk about odd behaviors, his wife has acting strange in my opinion. So have more than a few of his staffers. They are way more worried about protecting Israel than the murder.
16 posted on
12/09/2025 10:07:09 PM PST by
DesertRhino
(When men on the chessboard, get up and tell you where to go…)
To: DesertRhino
He’s a simp for whatever DC says. And he was just a Special Forces man. He is an amateur when it comes to murder investigations and the law. And I notice he doesn’t refute her points, he just says a friend wouldn’t do that. I’ll tell you what a friend wouldn’t do, they wouldn’t stay silent about the strange problems in this case. And if we want to talk about odd behaviors, his wife has acting strange in my opinion. So have more than a few of his staffers. They are way more worried about protecting Israel than the murder. Good night...
I guess that's the best that can be done to defend the indefensible. But there is another option - not doing that.
To: DesertRhino
And if we want to talk about odd behaviors, his wife has acting strange in my opinion. So have more than a few of his staffers. They are way more worried about protecting Israel than the murder.
When Charlie Kirk came to Candace in a dream, did that settle it for you?
23 posted on
12/10/2025 1:59:34 AM PST by
Jan_Sobieski
(Sanctification)
To: DesertRhino
29 posted on
12/10/2025 4:28:25 AM PST by
Dartoid
To: DesertRhino
It is one thing to identify specific issues and concerns—which are factual and can be falsified by other facts.
It is a totally different thing to claim bad acts without strong evidence supporting those claims.
If someone wants to claim bad actors are working together to do bad acts they need to provide hard evidence—not speculation or theoretical constructs.
Btw—this is the difference between Fuentes and Owens.
When Fuentes makes a claim he brings receipts.
When Owens make a claim she brings innuendo and speculation.
31 posted on
12/10/2025 6:45:07 AM PST by
cgbg
(The master is nice only when the dog behaves as expected.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson