Posted on 12/09/2025 5:04:45 AM PST by MtnClimber
The US has released a new National Security Strategy which re-envisions the Monroe Doctrine for a new century. Bernhard at MoA covered it in full here for those interested in the thorough details. I’ll instead look at the bigger picture, as well as one specific, fascinating aspect of this major rethink of US foreign policy.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/06/world/europe/trump-europe-strategy-document.html
NYT’s subheading reframes the new vision as a hatred for Europe:
A new White House policy document formalizes President Trump’s long-held contempt for Europe’s leaders. It made clear that the continent now stands at a strategic crossroads.
Well, why wouldn’t Trump hate the new Europe? It’s a continent that has turned its back on civil liberties, the principles for which America itself was supposed to stand first and foremost.
It accused the European Union of stifling “political liberty,” warned that some NATO members risked becoming “majority non-European,” and said the U.S. should align with “patriotic European parties” — code for Europe’s far-right movements.
Most interesting in the above is the mention of one particular aspect of Trump’s new document, which essentially reframes US’s waning support for Europe as a backlash against Europe’s continued policy of erasure of its own peoples and cultures.
A different NYT article focused entirely on this:
The Trump administration said on Friday that Europe was facing the “stark prospect of civilizational erasure” and pledged that the United States would support like-minded “patriotic” parties across the continent to prevent a future in which “certain NATO members will become majority non-European.”
Others covered this most intriguing of angles directly as well, here the National Pulse:
https://thenationalpulse.com/2025/12/05/trump-admin-fears-nato-allies-will-become-disloyal-partners-as-mass-migration-turns-them-majority-non-european/
And why wouldn’t that be a legitimate security concern for the US? When the demographics of your chief allies completely revert to a people with understandably questionable loyalties to the very security architectures which underpin your key alliance—well, that becomes quite a tangible problem.
Here are the exact relevant passages from the new Trump NSS—read the bolded carefully:
- Page 25: “The larger issues facing Europe include activities of the European Union and other transnational bodies that undermine political liberty and sovereignty, migration policies that are transforming the continent and creating strife, censorship of free speech and suppression of political opposition, cratering birthrates, and loss of national identities and self-confidence. Should present trends continue, the continent will be unrecognizable in 20 years or less. As such, it is far from obvious whether certain European countries will have economies and militaries strong enough to remain reliable allies.”
- Page 27: “Over the long term, it is more than plausible that within a few decades at the latest, certain NATO members will become majority non-European. As such, it is an open question whether they will view their place in the world, or their alliance with the United States, in the same way as those who signed the NATO charter.”<.i>
The point is so significant, let’s run it again: “As such, it is far from obvious whether certain European countries will have economies and militaries strong enough to remain reliable allies…As such, it is an open question whether they will view their place in the world, or their alliance with the United States, in the same way as those who signed the NATO charter.”
To repeat: Isn’t that a genuine concern? When your very own allies have shifted their core demographic to the point that you must worry about the civic, social, and cultural underpinning of the agreements with those very allies, it’s time to rethink relevant strategic alliances you have with them.
This has long been a growing concern in the West, ever since the globalist migration social engineering wave had begun peaking and reshaping the social fabric of Western nations.
In the US in particular, this was highlighted in the early 2000s in a kind of cult-essay written by Stephen Steinlight, called “The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography”.
In the essay, Jewish writer Steinlight makes a similar argument, but from the perspective of Jewish influence in the US. His argument is that the mass migration sweeping through the US will eventually alter the demographics of the nation to such an extent that it will pose a serious threat to Jewish-American ‘special interests’, given that the predominantly Latin-American and Muslim immigrants will lack the same inculcated sense of respect for Jewish values and guilt for the Holocaust that native-born Americans possess.......SNIP
Europe definitely is NOT aligned with the values of freedom and security.
Europeans are self genociding with birth rates far below the death rate. The pill was an invention of Satan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.