Theory #1 — A woman with CIA connections planted the bombs. Debunked: she has video of her playing with dogs, so her alibi is airtight.
Theory #2 — the retarded black guy did it.
I have an alibi too!
I have a video of me playing poker with dogs AND Abraham Lincoln in the Cafe Americaine in Casablanca!
HAS to be Thoeory #2 as you say.
Like who has a video of themselves playing with dogs (also assuming date/time stamped) that just happens to be at the same time the dirty deeds were being performed? What are the odds?
Timestamps can be easily faked. Just the fact that she has video of her dogs with timestamps and that it was so readily available 5 years later is itself suspicious, and it comes out moments after she’s accused, when it usually takes much longer to exonerate people falsely accused when it’s not one of their own.
Time stamped video at 3am of her playing with her cats is fishy enough for me not to rule anything out with her.
Theory #3: #1 & #2 are tells as to the players of this ‘game’, in conjunction with one or more people harboring enough influence to stymie investigations in 2 federal agencies (FBI & DOJ).
If communications are forthcoming - assuming they haven’t already been wiped - then my ‘theory #3’ is dem power brokers, perhaps associated with the witch of the west.
If communications are NOT forthcoming - i.e., ‘wiped’ - then nothing is ever provable except by elimination for #4:
“Echoes of Crooks,” and left a fall guy who will probably be deemed incompetent to stand trial (if reports are accurate).
That stated, it’s a nice piece of drama to distract from the anti-Trump media narrative, isn’t it? /s