To: MtnClimber
For someone who is not following along why did she say this:
“Lindsey Halligan, the interim U.S. Attorney had admitted to the trial judge on Wednesday that the full grand jury never saw the final version of the charges against Comey.”
Is it a factual statement or not
7 posted on
11/21/2025 6:42:38 AM PST by
RummyChick
(If I did not provide a link in my post none will be forthcoming )
To: RummyChick
Hard to say as it could be the journalist’s interpretation.
13 posted on
11/21/2025 6:59:33 AM PST by
PghBaldy
(12/14/12- 930am -rampage begins... 12/15/12 - 1030am - Obama team scouts photo-op locations.)
To: RummyChick
The activist judge asked the attorney about something that is not required. The grand jury voted on three counts. They did not get a majority on the first count, but they did on the second and third counts. The official charge filing was rewritten to remove the first count and the jury foreperson agreed that this was how the grand jury voted.
There was no reason to vote again since they voted on each individual count already. This was just an activist judge and MSM reporting to protect Comey.
15 posted on
11/21/2025 7:02:19 AM PST by
MtnClimber
(For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
To: RummyChick
That’s rich, for you to ask someone for elaboration—
-— considering your tagline
Your answer is in the excerpt
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson