Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 11/19/2025 12:47:58 PM PST by Red Badger
A guy's gotta do what a guy's gotta do!
"Lucy" Lauser is a dude who dresses like a woman and is somehow a city councilor in Stevenson, Washington.
Lauser was cited for appearing topless at a local protest. From The Post Millennial:
Lauser's legal troubles stem from a July 4, 2025, protest outside the Skamania County Courthouse in downtown Stevenson, a small community of about 1,500 residents. During the demonstration, Lauser exposed his breasts by removing his shirt. He had painted one arm red, taped his mouth and nipples in black, and inscribed 'woman, life, freedom' across his chest.
The topless display was intended to challenge President Donald Trump's executive order restricting sex change procedures for minors and barring men from competing on women's sports teams, which Lauser has publicly decried as dehumanizing.
[SNIP]
Because Lauser says he's a woman, he was treated as a woman.
He was handcuffed by Skamania County Sheriff's deputies after refusing a deputy's request to cover up, citing potential 'affront or alarm' to passerby. Released on $500 bail the same day, Lauser faces up to 90 days in jail and a $1,000 fine if convicted under Washington's indecent exposure statute, which prohibits 'any open and obscene exposure' likely to offend.
During court hearings, Lauser's lawyer argued that men are allowed to walk around without shirts on.
Defense attorney Pruett argued that Lauser's conduct did not amount to indecent exposure because he had his nipples covered in black. 'It's the amount of exposure that a person would have if they were wearing a bikini,' he told Judge Reyneir, arguing that 'if there was a person in town who was male on the Fourth of July and was walking down the street without a shirt on, we would not have a prosecution for obscenity or any indecent exposure.'
You have to hand it to the lawyer - he REALLY had to dig in to avoid "misgendering" his client or giving away the game.
Anyway, since I've heard gender is fluid and can change by the second, shouldn't Mr. Lauser be able to identify as whatever he wants, whenever he wants, lest we be guilty of trans genocide??
Judge Reynier said the case was 'complicated' and would make a ruling on a later date once reviewing the full material.
It's not complicated, your honor.
Some comments:
TWEETS AT LINK........................
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
I can't think of anything more offensive than a mentally ill MAN who thinks he is a woman romping around with big, fake boobs. Gross! Guilty as charged!!
Democrats are big on not offending anyone. What about us who are offended by this garbage?
“Democrats are big on not offending anyone.”
That applies only to other Democrats....................
Don’t say “Men don’t have boobs” until you have lived in Appalachia. Some men here even have back boobs. I am so glad “wife beater” season is over.
Indecent exposure in Washington State is very loosely defined by law:
RCW 9A.88.010
Indecent Exposure.
(1) A person is guilty of indecent exposure if he or she intentionally makes any open and obscene exposure of his or her person or the person of another knowing that such conduct is likely to cause reasonable affront or alarm.
As can be seen, it leaves a lot of space in the determination. Some people might consider it indecent while others wouldn’t. And the fact that the individual is masquerading as the opposite birth sex makes it more in the lines of purposeful exposure dedicated to being indecent because of shock value. Interesting that he is hiding behind his birth sex for a political statement.
wy69
I was raised in the southern end of Appalachia. So I know what you are talking about!.................. 😫
Did he have breasts? (man boobs don’t count)
If not, it’s not indecent exposure - but you could probably get him on some kind of dress code violation. Other than the beach or the swimming pool, going shirtless is often not permitted regardless of sex.
I think he had hormone boobs...............
Yeah, that sounds both indecent and disgusting.
Personally, I think if a girl is good looking enough, exceptions should be made.
Gotta take photos....................for evidence.........
“Men are not penalized” SOME should!
men don’t have private organs there...kind of a difference...
Personally I think the “man boob” conversation is long overdue. Sometimes the human eye just can’t take what’s all out in the open for the world to see. So cover it up.
nipples covered in black. ‘
pose as a woman, play by women’s rules. Black tape does not equal a bikini top
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.