Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I suppose I’m just a peasant, but when I think of “modern art” I mostly think of art responding to photography. You want realism? Here is a photograph. What can painting offer that is better than photographic realism? Well, the painter can offer subjective impressions and alternative ways of seeing the world. Turner, Seurat, Van Gogh, Picasso, Pollock — they did what photographs could not do. Joseph Wright of Derby? I think it’s a stretch to call it modern art.


3 posted on 11/16/2025 2:02:01 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (Democrats seek power through cheating and assassination. They are sociopaths. They just want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

when one adds all the fake imagery out today from people to space to geography, everything “art”, everything real, is destroyed...


6 posted on 11/16/2025 2:13:16 PM PST by sit-rep (START DEMANDING INDICTMENTS NOW!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

Alas, I like you, am too simple minded to grasp what’s being discussed here. Although admittedly it was hard to read as my eyes rolled back in my head while reading g the article


7 posted on 11/16/2025 2:16:25 PM PST by j.havenfarm (24 years on Free Republic, 12/10/24! More than 10,500 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

I think the invention of photography, and of moving pictures, had a profound effect on artists.

If you look at the picture “Nude Descending a Staircase,” by Marcel Duchamp, you can see he’s just superimposing a bunch of individual frames from a film of a woman descending a staircase, although he puts an abstract expressionism spin on each frame.

Perhaps modern art was born out of a desire on the part of some painters who said themselves “photography has made realism obsolete, so why not go in the opposite direction, from hyper-concrete to hyper-abstract?”

I’m connecting this in my mind to the case of trombonist George Roberts. When he came to Hollywood in 1947, after serving in the Navy, George Roberts dove into the LA music scene.

He quickly realized that “going high” on the trombone was territory already well-explored by Urbie Green and others.

So George Roberts decided to “go low.” He proceeded to make himself into the best bass trombonist in the business, and became a favorite of numerous band leaders and singers.

Artists have to try to find a competitive edge, a niche, if they’re going to make a living doing what they love.

Perhaps “modern art” was just a reaction to the observation that photography and cinema had completely locked up the “land of photorealistic art. So let’s look elsewhere.


9 posted on 11/16/2025 2:30:22 PM PST by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

Nothing beats this as Modern Art!..................

37 posted on 11/17/2025 5:55:29 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson