I wonder what Alex's numbers are like he has grown a lot since being unbanned on twitter but had that defamation suit to deal with which proved costly.
My ass.
That Fuentes is Kirk’s successor is absurd and wishful thinking by the NYT.
Another psy-op from the Times. It’s like the “proud boys” hysteria a few years back.
Who da heck is Nick Fuentes?
YET ANOTHER article about Nick Fuentes
Who the hell is this guy, and why am I suddenly being bombarded with details of what a devil he is?
He’s like Emmanuel Goldstein in the book 1984.
Nick will have a lot of fun with this article—starting with the name of the writer.
Looking at the Paul family's long and loving relationship with the other mohammedans I can see why you would like him.
Fuentes and the New York Slimes have several things in common. They both love and admire Joseph Stalin. They both hate Israel for defending itself.
David Duke, Q Anon and now Nick Fuentes. All fabrications of Left Wing Wackos.
“Nick uses bad language too much for my liking and is a bit grating in style.”
So you like his message and ideas, but don’t like his style?
I try to observe and report yes a lot of hits a lot of attention to Nick Fuentes who still has far fewer followers than other folks out there like dare I say Candace Owens.
President Donald Trump is said to have been crossing swords with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in private lately.
Does that now make MAGA a target for takedown in retribution by the likes of Loomer, Levin, Ben Shapiro the “Netanyahu Hit Squad”?
Targets Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Steve Bannon, MTG others.
Who? Nobody I know has ever heard of the guy. CIA Psyop? Deep state con? Tucker must be enjoying his big $$ for that Qatari prince, but it is definitely come at the price of destroying his reputation. Tucker is like kryptonite now.
Doubtful. TPUSA is splintered.
I notice the leftists are trying to make Fuentes the face off the Republican party.
That dog won’t hunt.
Fuentes could never succeed Charlie, because (1) he is not a true Christian, but a fake, performative one, like Candace; and (2) His heart is not overflowing with love and generosity, but rather hate and a desire for revenge against perceived wrongs done to him and his “race.”
Complete lie, NY slimes is trying to smear Charlies work and label conservatives with this article.
Basically, guilt through a fabricated association and a falsely attributed succession.
I am sure that Nick Fuentes is a Rand Paul supporter. As a replacement for Charlie Kirk, not even in Rand Paul’s world.
What’s really messed up is that Tucker Carlson is the common thread for both Turning Point and Fuentes.
TP needs to disassociate totally from Carlson. Instead, they have him as the highlight of their December event.
And Carlson and Fuentes have a love connection, slobbering all over each other.
Again: Messed up.
Google AI quotes Nick Fuentes as saying “I love Hitler”.
Can anyone debunk that claim? Out of context?
Can anyone find the entire statement?
The Kirk family should sue the New York Times for slander - Nick Fuentes and Charlie Kirk were not on the same page, not even in the same league.
Fuentes created the playbook Carlson is now trying to use - by intent, be as controversial as possible as your route to getting enough attention. Fuentes is on the fringe of being “on the Right” and is nowhere on the center of it.
Charlie Kirk never tried to be controversial, was truly never controversial and was only considered controversial by the Leftists. Kirk was a centrist to the “Right” as anyone could be, and not at all on the fringes of it.
The New York Times has manufactured its own erroneous political placement of Nick Fuentes and Charlie Kirk, hoping to use the former’s positions with which to slander the later.