Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senators will force a vote to prevent war on Venezuela without approval from Congress
NPR ^ | Oct 17 | npr

Posted on 10/17/2025 2:33:33 PM PDT by RandFan

Amid a wave of U.S. military strikes in the Caribbean and plans for covert operations in Venezuela, Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., is leading a bipartisan effort to force a vote to stop President Trump from unilaterally declaring war on the South American nation.

Kaine, a longtime proponent of Congress' powers to declare war, filed the resolution late Thursday, a move that will force the Senate to take up the legislation after a 10-day waiting period. Sens. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and Rand Paul, R-Ky., co-sponsored the plan.

Kaine said concerns about war in the Latin American region are growing.

"The pace of the announcements, the authorization of covert activities and the military planning makes me think there's some chance this could be imminent," Kaine told reporters.

(Excerpt) Read more at npr.org ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: 123oclock4oclockzot; antifa; antisemite; cartelfan; cokeheadrand; corruptsenator; desertrhino; desertrino; designatedterrorist; fara; foreignagent; frstormfronters; iran; justinraimondo; lookwholovescartels; lookwholovescommies; ms13fan; multiplefrnicks; muslimfan; nazifan; paulcrimefamily; power2initiatewar; power2startawar; randpaul4antifa; randpaulisatraitor; randpaulsucks; randstandswithiran; randstandswithkaine; randstandswithmaduro; randstandswithtda; randstandwithms13; rino; rinofan; tdafan; timkaine; timkainefan; whyishestillhere; zot; zotthistraitor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: RandFan
It did in the time frame with which the Founders were familiar and which influenced how they drew up the Constitution.

The problem now is that the US became a huge military power during WWII and decided afterwards on a policy of forward defense, which requires a large standing military and a large number of foreign bases.

People need to understand the Declaration of War power in its original context, which is tied to the treason clause. A DoW gives tremendous novel internal powers to the Federal government, especially the President: Americans can be charged with treason, foreign ships and assets in the US can be seized without legal redress, foreigners interned or expelled, and trade banned, etc., etc.

The notion that the President can't use the military against a foreign power without a DoW is hippie BS from the 1960s. The Congress can't think the world is dangerous enough to fund a $1 trillion military and then say, "But you can't use it without our say so."

21 posted on 10/17/2025 2:55:22 PM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

“The Congress has no power to substitute their authority for the President’s over the military under the Constitution.”

Yeah, they literally do. Article I, Section 8, Clause 11: Congress has the power to declare war, issue letters of Marque and Reprisal etc. Congress is the superior branch of the US government and has the ultimate say.

The President cannot simply make war as he pleases until that years defense authorization runs out. Not even the modern war powers act tries to say that. Where did you get that deranged idea?


22 posted on 10/17/2025 2:56:13 PM PDT by DesertRhino (When men on the chessboard, get up and tell you where to go…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

I agree. Self defense from drug traffic does not warrant starting an aggresive war with another Nation. Especially a Nation that could become Nuclear capable in just a few days if their allies move a couple subs in. Russia and China both would do this in a heartbeat. The risk is far far greater than is being considered. We will not be going to war with Venezuela, we will be going to war with China and Russia and they will move Nukes in way too close for comfort. It is a mistake and we will absolutely be sorry we did it.


23 posted on 10/17/2025 2:59:09 PM PDT by Openurmind (AI - An Illusion for Aptitude Intrusion to Alter Intellect. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

Desert Shield was just a deployment. No hostilities commenced on our part until Congress acted.

Senate Joint Resolution 2 was approved in the United States Senate on January 12, 1991, by a vote of 52 to 47.
House Joint Resolution 77 was approved in the United States House of Representatives on January 12, 1991, by a vote of 250 to 183


24 posted on 10/17/2025 3:00:25 PM PDT by DesertRhino (When men on the chessboard, get up and tell you where to go…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

True. My point was it wasn’t a war declaration as the two idiot Senators demand.


25 posted on 10/17/2025 3:02:05 PM PDT by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Kim taine needs unelecting. Stop the steal, watch out it’s real!


26 posted on 10/17/2025 3:03:22 PM PDT by Recompennation ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

“The Congress can’t think the world is dangerous enough to fund a $1 trillion military and then say, “But you can’t use it without our say so.”

Yes, the President is not a dictator and cannot take the nation to war on his own whim. Even the war powers act requires him to notify congress for brief defensive actions, and Congress can disapprove anything beyond that initial period.

They can stop any military action they please.


27 posted on 10/17/2025 3:03:39 PM PDT by DesertRhino (When men on the chessboard, get up and tell you where to go…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
On October 8, 2025, the U.S. Senate voted down a War Powers Resolution aimed at blocking military strikes in the Caribbean without congressional authorization. The resolution failed with a 48-51 vote...

Does this mental midget believe that he has any chance after the first fail?

28 posted on 10/17/2025 3:04:12 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
The President cannot simply make war as he pleases until that years defense authorization runs out.

I'm sorry but that's exactly what the 17th century English history with which the Founders were familiar taught them.

The Declaration of War power is tied to the treason clause: the Founder's primary fear about the war power was that it would be used to convict political opponents of treason.

Look at it the opposite way: If Congress declared war, and the President refused to fight, could they force him? They have no power to do so.

Similarly, if Congress sued to have SCOTUS order Trump to cease and desist, what do you think they would do? They would say that's a political question not within our purview to decide.

29 posted on 10/17/2025 3:06:03 PM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

Clearly though, a conventional invasion of Venezuela is not a minor defensive action and a Declaration of War should be taken is Trump wants to make the case.


30 posted on 10/17/2025 3:06:45 PM PDT by DesertRhino (When men on the chessboard, get up and tell you where to go…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Nam....Did Congress forget to declare war? How many of our guys died?


31 posted on 10/17/2025 3:07:16 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
They can stop any military action they please.

No they cannot, because they have no legal power to do so. They cannot pass an act stripping the President of command.

As I said, they can impeach or refuse to fund: but those are political acts by Congress against the Presidency. That's what a separation of powers means when push comes to shove.

You've drunk too much libertarian hippie Kool Aide.

32 posted on 10/17/2025 3:10:35 PM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Agreed. But that isn’t the issue now. So far it’s only attacking drug boats in international waters.

It does look more like an Ortega thing. Or the plot of Die Hard 2.


33 posted on 10/17/2025 3:12:27 PM PDT by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Nope. Back off.


34 posted on 10/17/2025 3:14:32 PM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chopperk
THIS exactly.
35 posted on 10/17/2025 3:15:23 PM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15
'The Congress has no power to substitute their authority for the President's over the military under the Constitution. '

Not true at all. Congress has supreme authority on setting the rules of the military, telling forces to stop piracy, insurrections and invasions. The entire point of it, is for congress to tell a potus what to do, and such potus execute the war when directed. Congress and a State are the only authorities granted the ability of war.

36 posted on 10/17/2025 3:15:28 PM PDT by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Theoria
The UCMJ isn't the same as taking the power of command away from the President. It's the same with the Boland Amendment from the 80s which forbade any use of military funding to support operations in Central America: it was a ruse by which Congress sought to assert command authority over the military.

There isn't any way to square this circle assuming Congress gives the President a large military. Again, it's a political, not a legal issue.

And the article is so poorly written I can't understand what they are trying to pass to stop Trump.

37 posted on 10/17/2025 3:25:38 PM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

if I am not mistaken, he can do “special Operations” without a declaration of war for up to 90 days.

Afterwards a Declaration is needed for further military action.

I, of course, could be wrong.


38 posted on 10/17/2025 3:25:46 PM PDT by SPDSHDW (A sinner saved by Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Veto!

I don’t think this will be an invasion.

I think their goal on a perfect day is to sweep down pull up into a chopper the 19 or 20 most wanted in Venezuela including Maduro himself, leave and call it a day.

No “regime change” is needed.

The Venezuelan people already voted for a regime change but the Maduro regime refused to step down.

The Venezuelan elected officials are on the sidelines


39 posted on 10/17/2025 3:38:10 PM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

That plus we need to send home a few thousand illegals.


40 posted on 10/17/2025 3:44:23 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson