Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 10/13/2025 12:25:59 PM PDT by ransomnote
[H/T Red Badger]
SNIP
In 2016, Dr. Zervos crossed paths with Bigtree, who urged him to take on something public health had avoided for decades: a study comparing the health outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated children.
Dr. Zervos agreed, determined to prove Bigtree and other vaccine skeptics wrong. At the time, he vowed, “Whatever the results, they get published.”
SNIP
Dr. Zervos agreed, and the study was completed in 2020. As Bigtree anticipated, the results were devastating for the vaccinated — but there was one major problem: Dr. Zervos chose not to publish the study.
In 2022, Bigtree convinced Dr. Zervos to sit down and explain why. Knowing the importance of the moment, he recorded the conversation on hidden camera.
There, Dr. Zervos openly admitted on tape why he chose not to publish the data. He said bluntly, “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.”
Here’s what the study revealed:
• Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma.
• Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema).
• Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders — a category that includes over 80 different diseases.
• 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.
• 2.9 times more motor disabilities.
• 4.5 times more speech disorders.
• Three times more developmental delays.
• Six times more acute and chronic ear infections.
• In nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders.
• The study’s conclusion is devastating. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.”
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
There’s so much extensive information in the article, I hope everyone reads it!
dogpooduke ain’t gonna like this.
what kinds of vaccinations are we talking about. covid? flu? polio? tb?
The study is here:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33266457/#&gid=article-figures&pid=figure-1-uid-0
ransomnote: it examined pediatric records and said ‘variable vaccination’.
“We performed a retrospective analysis spanning ten years of pediatric practice focused on patients with variable vaccination born into a practice, presenting a unique opportunity to study the effects of variable vaccination on outcomes.”
my God, what a tremendous amount of damage these National Institutes of Co-ordinated Experimenters (NICE) perpetrated.
(yeah, i know, i know, we can’t prove it, but a lot more were saved/cured. or yeah, we didn’t know, we were just following the ‘science.’ or yeah, we were just doing what we were required to do., etc., etc.)
This has been out for some time, but still good to see reported.
Thanks ‘note.
<>Dr. Zervos agreed, determined to prove Bigtree and other vaccine skeptics wrong. At the time, he vowed, “Whatever the results, they get published.”<>
After the study results:
<>There, Dr. Zervos openly admitted on tape why he chose not to publish the data. He said bluntly, “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.”<>
First, do no harm to my investment portfolio.
That’s the stand out problem with the Plandemic, “We can’t prove it.” They should have added, “We refuse to prove what we say.”
We can’t let them remain in public health if they won’t behave as if we are their employers and show us all the proof they have, engage in debates which don’t destroy doctor’s lives, etc.
We wouldn’t tolerate a car mechanic which provided us with a bill without indicating what repair were done, what the problem was. We expect full disclosure, from bank cards to home loans to rental agreements. We have to push back on future NIH/CDC etc. to give us proof and allow researchers and physicians to obtain proof they request.
The CDC developed the PCR test without reference to the actual Covid virus. Instead, since the CDC said an isolated sample of the virus was ‘unavailable’, the CDC used a ‘related virus’.
But then testing positive on that PCR was used to deny patients any treatment and send them home until they needed a respirator. For testing positive on a test for some ‘related virus’? What if those people had that related virus and NOT covid?
Then the C19 “vaccine” was developed and tested using the PCR test for that other ‘related corona virus’. SO they tested, or so they claim, the effectiveness of their ‘vaccine’ to see if people tested positive for that other virus after ‘vaccination.’
In fact, the spike proteins were ‘hand selected’ by Fauci’s NIAH for use in the ‘vaccine’ at a time when the CDC was denying requests for samples of Covid because it was ‘unavailable’.
Our C19 ‘vaccines’ were based on a computer model of the vaccine released by China because China said an isolated sample of the C19 virus was ‘unavailable. The computer modeling software built a model of the C19 virus out of a ‘library of pre-existing samples.’ But, we were told that C19 had no precedent and therefore we had no immunity to it.
We would fire anyone who told us humanity faced extinction and then never isolated the virus, and instead, based tests and vaccines on different viruses or computer modeling.
The reluctance to publishing this study shows the stranglehold that Big Pharma has on the medical industry.
ok what are variable vaccinations and who were they administered to. Young Children? adults?
“what kinds of vaccinations are we talking about. covid? flu? polio? tb?”
all childhood vaccinations were included in the vaccination side of the study ...
to paraphrase a great thinker: There are lies, damned lies, and ‘computer models.’
It says 2016 - so this is your standard, coverall “all vaccines are bad” “study” - and also posted from TGP and a long time fake news / conspiracy poster.
Please read the study at the link I provided, which will answer your questions.
Do you mean DungWeigh?
Whatever happened to natural immunity build up. When my friend’s daughter was 5, she got the chicken pox. I sent my daughter to stay overnight and specifically told my friend to put her in he bath with her daughter. Sure enough, my daughter got it and was out 1 week of Kindergarten. Then my son, 2 years younger was put in the bath with his sister and he got, but wasn’t in school yet so didn’t miss any class.
BigVax Duke won’t like this. It makes me wonder who signs his pay checks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.