To: E. Pluribus Unum
How is it any different from Dims telling colleges they don't get climate research funding unless they produce the "right" results? Or they don't don't get any funding unless they let men in women's locker rooms?
But the AP article is written like this, if it's true anyway, is somehow a new thing from Trump.
2 posted on
10/02/2025 10:35:48 AM PDT by
Tell It Right
(1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Have you noticed how often AP writers have names you would associate with the Mullahs?
3 posted on
10/02/2025 10:36:49 AM PDT by
iamgalt
To: E. Pluribus Unum
More agitprop from Ass Press. They never give up.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
They’ll either refuse, or agree, then undermine the program by renaming and hiding the offensive practices President Trump wants to eliminate. Better install an overseer in each school to make sure they don’t pull a fast one.
5 posted on
10/02/2025 10:42:09 AM PDT by
Flaming Conservative
((Pray without ceasing)like he had it with him.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Unfortunately that is just plain wrong. There should be no federal money (our money taken by the government) given to any educational institution or entity other than grade schools on military installations and no government money given or lent to anyone to attend any such. The schools should be put onto the market. Prices will go down. Revolutionary foolishness will disappear. Fake "research" will disappear. Couple that with elimination of all teachers' colleges and education will happen in the schools once again.
7 posted on
10/02/2025 10:49:16 AM PDT by
arthurus
(|l covfeve l| )
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Why not create a government funded experimental program starting with 50 colleges/universities and have the experiment require a particular type of conservative education? Make it 12 year term and gauge the results in 2038.
No leftist ideology is permitted whatsoever.
8 posted on
10/02/2025 10:50:28 AM PDT by
Racketeer
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“The White House is asking nine major universities to commit to President Donald Trump’s political priorities in exchange for more favorable access to federal money.”
I will get blasted but if the above is an accurate take on what Trump has called for it raises serious First Amendment Concerns.
12 posted on
10/02/2025 11:23:54 AM PDT by
lastchance
(Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum

The authors.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
They committed to Biden’s without question. To me, this is a slide back towards neutrality. We know they won’t allow diversity of ideas without being forced.
15 posted on
10/02/2025 11:48:41 AM PDT by
Tacrolimus1mg
(Do no harm, but take no sh!t.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Playing nice has rewards.
16 posted on
10/02/2025 11:53:18 AM PDT by
Vaduz
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Oh please no.
How about no federal subsidies at all?
I mean unconditionally. And let them keep their agenda (presuming they can stay in business without the subsidies).
17 posted on
10/02/2025 12:35:03 PM PDT by
Salman
(It's not a slippery slope if it was part of the program all along.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson