I'm surprised these days they wouldn't consider this too RFK Jr.ish. I bet if he does take this up, which he should, they will say it's a conspiracy.
To: nickcarraway
Sorry, Medpage got me again,
To: ConservativeMind
To: nickcarraway
A key takeaway from the analysis is to avoid unnecessary imaging in children. Why would you do unnecessary imaging of children in the first place?
It is not the 1950s where the foot x-ray machine is a cool free toy to play with.
All imaging costs money. Lots of it. So who are these people taking their kids in for funnzies?
4 posted on
09/19/2025 1:44:50 PM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(It's like somebody just put the Constitution up on a wall …. and shot the First Amendment -Mike Rowe)
To: nickcarraway
"...avoid unnecessary imaging in children..."
-
How about avoiding ALL unnecessary imaging, PERIOD?
6 posted on
09/19/2025 1:49:46 PM PDT by
Repeal The 17th
(Get out of the matrix and get a real life.)
To: nickcarraway; Mazey; ckilmer; goodnesswins; Jane Long; jy8z; ProtectOurFreedom; matthew fuller; ...
The “Take Charge Of Your Health” Ping List
This high volume ping list is for health articles and studies which describe something you or your doctor, when informed, may be able to immediately implement for your benefit.
Email me to get on either the “Common/Top Issues” (20 - 25% fewer pings) or “Everything” list.
Thanks, nickcarraway!
7 posted on
09/19/2025 1:54:08 PM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: nickcarraway
To: nickcarraway
Begs the question as to why the kids are get 2-3 CTs to begin with. If they are already suffering serious illness in childhood, it’s not that surprising to see illness later.
Everybody’s tires wear a bit differently. It depends on the car you start with and the roads you take. It could be that, in this study, it’s more the car than the roads.
9 posted on
09/19/2025 1:57:55 PM PDT by
fruser1
To: nickcarraway
This reads to me like anything other than the CoupFlu vaxxes...
10 posted on
09/19/2025 2:03:29 PM PDT by
mewzilla
(Swing away, Mr. President, swing away! 🇺🇸 🏴)
To: nickcarraway
Which scans?
CT and what else?
11 posted on
09/19/2025 2:04:01 PM PDT by
Arcadian Empire
(The Baric-Daszak-Fauci spike protein, by itself, is deadly.)
Why are young kids getting xrays/scans in the first place?is it possible that this is a subset with possible tendencies to injury/sickness?
but no matter,we in western societies,pushed by big pharma and the medical industrial complex and their lawyers seek too often to use multiple medical treatments to our detriment,when simple patience and good nutrition would work.
14 posted on
09/19/2025 2:18:24 PM PDT by
cherry
To: nickcarraway
I guess we won't x-ray broken arms, legs, and heads any more?
I hear the ancient Mexican Aztecs had a special Sun God ceremony that was their "go to" cure for everything.
15 posted on
09/19/2025 2:40:40 PM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
( O give thanks unto the Lord, for He is gracious, and his mercy endures forever. — Psalm 106)
To: nickcarraway
Anyone remember those x-ray machines in shoe stores that would image your toes in the new shoes?
16 posted on
09/19/2025 2:46:05 PM PDT by
DugwayDuke
(Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
To: nickcarraway
I’m nearly 67. I’ve never had a CT or MRI scan.
It is my understanding that digital x-rays involve less radiation than film x-rays.
To: nickcarraway
“3.7 million children...2,961 hematologic cancers”
The risk is lower than simple division would indicate, but it does seem to be considerable.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson