Posted on 09/18/2025 9:04:10 AM PDT by RummyChick
Donald Trump appeared to take a veiled double swipe at Prince Harry during his state banquet speech as he lavished praise on Prince William and King Charles III.
The US President spoke highly of the Prince of Wales, describing him as the King's 'remarkable son' and 'really amazing' - with no mention of his brother Harry.
Mr Trump said last night: 'I just want to say that His Majesty has also raised a remarkable son in His Royal Highness, Prince of Wales. Really amazing. We've gotten to know you and I think you're going to have an unbelievable success in future.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
I can’t read this story but you can see it in his face during the video
“William’s ‘fury’ at Prince Andrew’s funeral ambush, told by friends to royal biographer ANDREW LOWNIE. ‘Personal’ feud over Kate and what really happened in awkward encounter revealed”
Harry had been born before any affair began.
here is the story about andrew from the mirror
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/royals/prince-william-furious-prince-andrew-35921957
Ridiculous. Trump didn’t mention Harry because he is persona non grata to the royal family. He was being diplomatic.
Amusingly, I see it from a different perspective. President Trump is showing them what an American who refuses to become royalty -- think that story of George Washington 250 years ago -- is like. The House of Windsor will be set aside one day to become as glittering and ad dazzling and as important as Philippe of Belgium. Available for personal appearances by appointment.... Mugs and sweatshirts available at the royal site....
William was there - had greeted them w/Kate on arrival. i didn’t read any kind of a dig into it at all. why would he bring up a sore subject? ridiculous pot-stirring
I don’t know man, look at them ears.
I can’t be that hard on the UK print medium.
The UK still have a lot of newspapers and maybe 20 per cent of the content is worth reading.
I can’t say the same for American newspapers.
Mark Halpern wrote a long and very well written piece on the Kimmel firing for the Daily Mail.
It is behind a paywall, but it is very sad such a well written piece by an American in America must be published by a UK paper, because there is no place for honest journalism on the pages of American newspapers.
they do look alike. Princess Diana was perfectly capable of lying about when she met the guy and various timelines. She was a neurotic mess who actually threw herself down the stairs while pregnant. She even pushed her stepmother down the stairs when she was a teenager.
But there are pictures of harry that look like Prince Phillip
Mmmmmm. You may have a point.
Ahhh, yezzzz; I’d forgot about that!
The King didn’t mention the whiner either.
These guys are just aching to find something to be outraged about, aren’t they? If Trump said “Nice day, isn’t it?” the headlines would be reading “Trump insults the moon!”
Glad you were there the whole time.
The satellite dish ears notwithstanding.
Sometimes there really is no story, nothing to see or hear, and you really can just move along.
This is just a reporter trying to attract attention and stir up controversy.
The things that look most alike between he and William is their resemblance to Charles and his side of the family. Harry is descended through Mary of Teck through Charles, not Diana. Harry looks the least like the Spencer side of the family of the two brothers:
Charles not mentioning him is even worse for Harry’s ego.
King’s son, Harry’s wife, King’s grandkids live in the USA.
Again, fostering bonds, allies , international understandings when family live in a friendly country.
NO MENTION WHATSOEVER BY ANYONE despite harry trying to worm his way back.
I’ve seen rumors about an Earl of Pembroke? But looks like the family would’ve addressed these issues privately.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.