[If You Want It Fixed - Fix It]

But if I get political points gor being such a hack...

[z3n]

“.... right? If you are innocent, it is impossible for you to be named in and under any circumstance. “

~~~

This message brought to you by the most innocent Bill Clinton

[mouse1]

The more important question....With all that has happened recently, Why are they so desperate to keep Epstein in the news?

[hanamizu]

The thing to remember is that anything said by a member of Congress during official meetings is immune from any sort of legal redress.

[444Flyer]

The LORD has His own list. Those who abuse children sexually may be at the top of His enemies. Daniel 7:10, Revelation 20:12-13

But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.~ Matthew 18:6

[Robert DeLong]

No. There may be some who do not want to acknowledge their involvement, and they must be respected. I say if the women want to stand up and divulge their knowledge, then let them do so. Not MTG, nor Thomas Massie.

It is not their right to victimize them again.

[bigbob]

They’re protected by “speech and debate clause” so they can do whatever they want. They’ve made it clear they have little concern for not doing things that serve little purpose in the past, and this is just grandstanding. The only place those names will ever be of importance is when they’re on an indictment.

[zeestephen]

As long as Rep. Massie and Rep. MTG publicly disclose the names and contact information of the people who are making Epstein related accusations, I have no problem with reading the names of the accused into the Congressional Record.

But - since ALL the accusers will be instantly sued by ALL the accused - none of the accusers will allow their own identity to be released.

Accept the reality, folks.

There is no Epstein client list, and never was.

[popdonnelly]

No, because knowing Epstein doesn’t prove you were a pedophile. Members of Congress get away with a lot of sh__ because they have immunity.

[Repealthe17thAmendment]

Innocent people have been accused of all sorts of things. That's why we have a process for people to defend themselves.

What Massie seems to want to do is make the accusation without having offered the person a chance to defend themselves. For a guy who is a supposed champion of person liberty, this is an odd stance.

This brings up the case of Alan Dershowitz, who was named by one of the Epstein girls. He adamantly denied it, and the accusation was later withdrawn.

[DesertRhino]

Everyone involved with Epstein is dirty. Even the few that didn’t indulge in the underage girls. The sex is interesting, but the real story is his web of financial corruption and who all was involved.

This was a Mossad blackmail and influence operation. There are no innocents there on that list. Anyone on that list is dirty, either financially, sexually, or too stupid to be trusted by Americans.

[DesertRhino]

Suddenly DC is high-minded and trying to protect innocent bankers and celebrities who only -innocently- partied and had financial interactions with that Mossad spy.

Time for DC and our elites to get a badly needed bleaching out process. Then next time their insider-deals and jet set party life with young prostitutes looks tempting, they might need to stop and think.

They protect each other, that is what is happening now, and Americans are sick of it.

[jacknhoo]

I’m surprised and disgusted by MTG’s antics lately.

I’m not in the least bit surprised by the disgusting antics of Massie.

[fella]

Innocents need to be named in order for the guilty to be outed. That’s how the telling of the truth works.