Posted on 09/15/2025 3:02:18 PM PDT by Morgana
Eileen Davidson has sparked outrage online after sharing a controversial post about conservative political activist Charlie Kirk, just days after he was fatally shot on the campus of Utah Valley University.
The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills alum, 66, reposted a message on Instagram that read: 'I am not in support of what happened to Charlie Kirk but Charlie Kirk was in support of what happened to Charlie Kirk.'
A screenshot of the post has since been uploaded to Reddit, where it has received 59,000 upvotes and 786 comments, which is a massive response on the site.
The remark was a reference to Kirk's uncompromising views on gun rights, in which he argued gun-related deaths are an unfortunate but necessary cost of protecting the Second Amendment right to bear arms.
Davidson quickly faced backlash for the post, which many critics interpreted as mocking Kirk's assassination.
In response to the criticism, the Emmy Award–winning actress, who is also known for her work on Days of Our Lives and The Young and the Restless, attempted to clarify her position.
'Never ever in one million years would I celebrate the assassination of anybody, ever. Please don't twist things around,' she told her 275,200 followers.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Well, she plays a mentally ill woman on Young and Restless, so...
Reddit Users - the underbelly of the beast.
**************
In that "retraction" she admits that she knew what she was saying in her original post. She didn't have to say anything, but she did (in raw form) and it was disgusting.
Real Housewife?
Don’t know, don’t care.
Young and Restless?
Don’t know, don’t care.
I prefer the Maestro himself.
Johnny Carson and “The Edge Of Wetness.”
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=W_g_2gSjdTo
Those subreddit echo chambers are mostly bots. Still you are correct.
From the South, learned long ago, that if you can’t say anything nice, say nothing at all. Bless her heart.
Wisdom is knowing what to say and knowing when not to say it.
She claims that Tyler was MAGA. Her head is obviously somewhere it doesn’t belong.
This is why the media is such a danger to the country. The record has been corrected through the official spokesmen and STILL they keep spouting the lies.
Maybe all us MAGA folks could file a class-action libel lawsuit against these people, one by one, as they self-righteously make these totally clueless remarks.
Nobody ASKS for assassination, that is purely at the volition of the assassin. We cannot know what will trigger a potential killer into action, we can only see the results.
And sometimes the assassin either reveals his (or her) presence prematurely, or as fate would have, misses.
If you are going to take a shot at the king, better not miss, or the consequences take on an air of ruthlessness.
But get this - sometimes the REAL assassin, or the enablers, get away.
She played multiple women on Days of our Lives too(Kristen Dimera, Susan Banks, etc, I used to watch the show) a shame that someone that has sorta talent would be such a lunatic, but I guess its in the lefts DNA they cant help themselves
Yeah cause everyone who is maga that I know has a transgender boyfriend/sarc
What the left’s position, after the murder of Charlie Kirk, is, amounts to this:
We believe we should have the right to call anyone a Nazi.
We believe we should be the only ones who decide if the charge is true.
Nobody who is friends with someone accused of being a Nazi is allowed to defend them — they’re Nazis TOO!
Then, if we decide someone really IS a Nazi, we get to shoot them.
And then the world owes us a Gold Star for killing a Nazi.
Also, we’re against the death penalty, so nobody else gets to kill anyone. Especially nobody gets to kill us.
But we still get to kill anybody.
And finally, if you disagree with any of this, you’re a Nazi.
everything before the word BUT
is BS
Kaboom!!! You nailed it.
The post was what passes for clever with these people
The reason we have him in custody is because his father is MAGA. Believes in the rule of law.
Her point is true: Charlie would rather be a victim of gun violence himself than have everybody’s ability to defend themselves taken away so that only the crooks have guns. That doesn’t mean he wants any innocent, non-threatening person to be killed by guns or anything else. It is not the guns that are the problem; if there weren’t guns crazy people would use a knife, as we saw with the Ukrainian girl on the bus. If this gal is willing to let people have knives then she believes the same thing about knives as Charlie believed about guns. Whether it is guns, knives, airplanes, drones, or anything else, the issue is not the implement that is used. It is the intent of the person who wields it that makes it either helpful or hurtful.
None of us are saying that this kid shouldn’t have had a gun. What we’re saying is that he should have had the mind of a human being, not the animalistic beliefs and actions of someone who thinks they are above God.
They are stool sweat. And I don't mean the type of stool you sit on.
She has no clue what Charlie believed. She is too lazy to take the time to find out before jabbering her jaw.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.