Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Charle Kirk assassination: was rifle staged ahead of time and is there video of people who could’ve staged it
The mind of the chief | 9/11/2025 | ChirfJayStrongbow

Posted on 09/11/2025 2:11:59 PM PDT by ChiefJayStrongbow

The FBI published a picture of the potential shooter, but unless it was a short barreled rifle with a folding stock, he wasn’t carrying the rifle in the stairwell which means it was already on the roof.

Since the FBI apparently has video of who was accessing the roof, they should review footage from that day and days prior to see who could be carrying a package that would hold the rifle they found.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: charliekirk; inthebackpack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: ChiefJayStrongbow

“Staged” to mean “placed”? Why say “staged” then, since it has another meaning?


61 posted on 09/11/2025 6:18:46 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

The one being promoted as the weapon can’t be disassembled or reassembled without a barrel vice.
You would be correct if it was an Accuracy International


62 posted on 09/11/2025 6:46:13 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChiefJayStrongbow

There is video of the guy limping down the street prior to the shooting. Speculation is that he had the rifle stuffed down his pant leg.


63 posted on 09/11/2025 7:33:08 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

I believe it’s very likely ANTIFA. I don’t believer a professional assassin would have a team of cohorts serving as distractions.


64 posted on 09/11/2025 11:52:12 PM PDT by The Duke (Not without incident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: gundog
The simplest explanation is that he did NOT want to eject that casing....No need....He got Charlie on the first shot...He upped and ran...and jumped and ran...

Asking for help from the public is fine...but maybe look at it as a "false flag". They don't want the shooter to panic. They want him to lead them to a planned destination...which my gut tells me is a hunting cabin in a deserted area....where he has supplies and a vehicle.

I can picture Columbo sitting in a chair when the door opens.

65 posted on 09/12/2025 2:47:26 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: ChiefJayStrongbow; All
Here's a long clip from a unique take by George Webb one of the best/brilliant researchers I have followed now for ten years. He's like Pres. Trump always ten steps ahead of everyone else.

here's George:

All this is from his substack,brilliant take on what happened.

https://substack.com/home/post/p-173399208

a white rabbit:

Part IX — Method: Socratic Metadata(data about other data) and the Needle in D.C.

The method section reads like a field manual. You don't comb Washington for a document; you ask, “Whose signature?” and walk to the Smithsonian.(smithstonian a known cia asset) Applied here: don't boil the ocean of 330 million suspects; sketch the signature—private jets, motorcycle runs to permissive airfields, embedded campus friends, white rabbits, a social-media harvest of rage—and work backward to the crew that does that kind of work.(brilliant dont get sucked in by media)

(ask the right questions:)

The process is Socratic:(brilliant process here) question by question that narrows the cone—Who ordered the security plan? Who changed it the morning of? Which door codes were used? Which cameras glitched and why those cameras? Who procured the riser, the mic, the lighting tree? Which vendor is agnostic to politics and which is not? Who called the first evacuation, and who stalled the second?

Then the human layer: who has pulled this lever before? Which names reappear across Waco, Mena, Fast and Furious, Butler, and a half-dozen smaller rehearsals? You're not building a conspiracy board; you're building a rolodex of capability.

That's how needles get found—in the habits of the hands that sew.

Part X — Next Moves, Red Lines, and the Cost of Being Right The close is both plea and plan. If this is the big leagues, you need pros from Dover—not TV lawyers, but case agents who cut their teeth on the real material. You need an investigative tent pitched on campus, not embargoes and press releases. You need to map the parking lots, pull the stairwell cams, and interview the badge logs. If the local power structure won't open doors, that refusal becomes Exhibit A.(all just too good)

At the same time, the narrator warns the citizen crew: don't form the next slaughter pen. These are people who believe, or behave as if they believe, that they're ordained to kill. They drag white rabbits through your feed not for fun but for harvest. Move fast, but don't be herded.

Finally, the text circles back to the thing that started it—September 11th and the emotional economy of headline murder. If the design is mass formation—rage, despair, purchase orders, and policy—then the counter-design is colder:

measure the advance team, isolate the patsy packaging, diagram the egress, and pick at every quiet decision made two hours before the shot and two hours after. That's where the story breaks. That's where it always breaks.

Appendix:

The Advance-Team + Patsy Model, Condensed

Premise:

*A seasoned advance team sets the stage—recon, access, signals, escape—around a public event where a high-profile conservative speaker is expected. Trigger:

* A professional shooter (primary or secondary position) takes a surgically chosen shot through a known weakness; the shot is timed to crowd noise or a rhetorical beat to mask report and delay recognition.

Diversion:

* White Rabbit One (political theater) and White Rabbit Two (street-level custody narrative) split attention and absorb media oxygen.

*Packaging:

Within 12–48 hours, authorities unveil a “lone patsy” bundle—identity, social labels, a manifesto, a prop weapon—designed to satisfy public appetite and channel political outrage.

*Egress:

Shooter and core crew exit on foot to bikes, into a van, then out toward uncontrolled airspace to rendezvous with a private aircraft whose movements are hard to triangulate in real time.(is this how the pros pull it off?)

*Policy Harvest: *Investigative Counter:

Ignore the frame-by-frame seduction unless it anchors to a team. Task the case on metadata—contracts, keys, badge pings, camera outages, parking assignments, radio logs, procurement trails, and flight habits.

Final word:

You don't win this by arguing over pixels. You win it by mapping people, logistics, and money, by cross-indexing who profits with who was present—not on a podium, but in the shadow lanes where trucks idle and stair doors latch. If there's a needle, it's not in the haystack; it's in the fingerprint of the hand that left the hay stacked just so.


66 posted on 09/12/2025 3:32:24 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Home of the Free Because of the Brave!! ITS ALL A CONSPIRACY:UNTIL ITS NOT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer
Well it looks like Ai was pretty dang close.

Killer.

Ai rendition.


67 posted on 09/12/2025 8:21:18 AM PDT by Boomer ('Democrat' is just another word for 'mentally ill'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson