Skip to comments.
17 Mechanisms Linking mRNA Shots to Cancer, Backed by Over 100 Studies
Drtrozzi.news ^
| Sep 09, 2025
| drtrozzi.news
Posted on 09/09/2025 9:47:18 AM PDT by ransomnote
[H/T Jane Long]
The following is Dr. Trozzi's introduction followed by my exerpt of the excellent article of the same name translated from the original French.
A comprehensive review of peer-reviewed research uncovering potential cancer-promoting effects of mRNA injections across multiple biological pathways.
I’m encouraged to see the old academic towers finally echoing the warnings many of us shared early on, often at great personal cost, about the medical assault and misrepresented injection campaigns.
We must pray the perpetrators of these COVID crimes are not gearing up for a second wave of profit, this time by treating the cancers they helped cause. They must face justice, not enjoy rewards.
After a 2022 World Council for Health meeting, I released a 4½-minute cancer alert warning of the post-injection cancer surge now unfolding worldwide. This was one reason I stepped away from everything to help stop the rollout. I explained this more fully early on in This is Not a Vaccine.
Thanks to Nic Hulscher for raising awareness of this story, the researchers behind the latest study, La Pointe Critique, and all the courageous medical professionals who have stood for truth. Their sacrifices matter.
The truth is rising. Stay the course.
Translated from the original French publication in La Pointe Critique (read original). While the translation may not be perfect, we have done our best to faithfully preserve the original meaning.
A portion of the scientific community raised the alarm more than four years ago about the cancer risks linked to mRNA COVID injections. Today, data from the scientific literature suggest these injections may have the potential to induce, accelerate, or reactivate cancers through 17 different mechanisms.
Is mass COVID vaccination at the root of an explosion in cancer cases, as many scientists claim, some of whom had predicted it as early as May 2021? A group of French oncologists published an op-ed two years ago in which they categorically rejected this hypothesis:
"To date, no warning signal has been published indicating an increased incidence or risk of rapid cancer progression following COVID-19 vaccination or any other vaccination."
Today, however, they report being faced with a tsunami of aggressive, fast-growing cancers, particularly among young people, for which they say there is no rational explanation:
We are seeing a lightning-fast rise in pancreatic cancer without having the slightest idea why. Did something happen? We don't know. The entire world, the entire field of oncology, is asking the same question. [...] The system that allows us to understand cancer is failing.
Prof. Khayat, co-founder of the InCA (French National Cancer Institute)
MORE OF THIS EXCELLENT ARTICLE AT THE LINK: 17 Mechanisms Linking mRNA Shots to Cancer, Backed by Over 100 Studies
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bigpharma; bigprofit; cancer; conspiratards; crimesvshumanity; furiousjabshills; jab; mrna; thisisjunkscience
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Another shade of C19 fraud:
Something rarely mentioned is the fact that shills used to describe the mRNA in the C19 'shots' as a variant of a natural cell component in the human body - messenger RNA. I recall a pharma troll denouncing a FReeper for not being qualified to have a discussion about the vax because she didn't "even know what messenger RNA" was. There was plenty of encouragement to make the assumption the 'm' in mRNA represented the classification of 'messenger' RNA.
Later I would read an article posted to FR (which I can't find now) which explained it's not messenger RNA in the vax. Instead, modified RNA is in the Covid 'vaccine'. That article asserted that the confusion was intentional. I was surprised how quickly that revelation of fraud upon the public sank from view. The information was there all along - essentially hiding in plain sight. For example, Moderna's company name is a derivation of the words 'modified' and RNA.
Jane Long's excellent post excerpted and linked to Anti-COVID mRNA vaccines can induce cancer in 17 distinct ways depending on more than 100 studies from which I'll take a snippet of information I haven't seen anywhere else:
modified mRNAs are not used clinically because of their durability, potentially permanent and immunostimulant. The persistent nature of mRNA encoding the Spike protein from SARS-CoV-2 leads to dangerously long exposure at an unlimited dose of this pathogenic protein, and therefore needs to be re-evaluated for continuous use in humans.70]
[70]Boros LG, Kyriakopoulos AM, Brogna C, Piscopo M, McCullough PA, Seneff S. Long-lasting, biochemically modified mRNA, and its frameshifted recombinant spike proteins in human and circulation after COVID-19 vaccination. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2024 Jun;12(3):e1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.1218.
A key rant among pharma shills was initially that the 'mRNA' only stays in the arm for approximately 36 hours or less. Assertions that the vax, specifically described as messenger RNA' is only in the body for a a few days, and that it is 'fragile' flooded the media as well. Back then I looked up messenger RNA and found it short lived. Here's an example of 'the narrative'.
Pfizer and Moderna along with the CDC, NIH and FDA had a duty to educate the public that the C19 'vaccines' used modified RNA and how it differs from messenger RNA, including the fact that the modified form is not used clinically due to its durability. They are responsible for watching the misinformation permeate our culture and 'failing' to correct misunderstandings; they were otherwise occupied threatening/firing/canceling/ and otherwise attacking those who spoke honestly of the vax's, denoucing them for spreading 'misinformation'.
It's not enough of a fig leaf to merely say they 'expected' the 'shot' to stay in the arm for a few days. This would be like Hillary trying to move into the White House after losing the election because she 'expected' to win and didn't check the news to find out who won. At least fake polling data could partially justify her warped expectation, whereas Pfizer and Moderna simply decided not to find out where the vax moved, and instead tell us they expected it wouldn't move at all.
Before rolling their multi-billion dollar experimental vax out to the entire world, Pfizer and Moderna didn't take 1 day to peform a basic, industry standard test to find out if the vax 'stayed in the arm' for some unknown reason, or if it could, for example, reach vital organs and generate spike proteins on the surface of those organs which would then be attacked by the body's own immune system.
Our CDC, NIH, and FDA all accepted and promoted the 'vaccine' without that industry standard 24hr bioaccumulation test to provide them with critical safety information. Japan wouldn't buy Pfizer's C19 'vaccine' without that 24 hour test.
At a time when physicians were threatened for daring to voice any doubt or concern about 'vaccine' claims, a physician on Twitter noted that the C19 'vaccine' developers had no reason to expect it to stay in the arm. Claims by Pfizer and Moderna that they 'expected' it to remain in the arm makes it sound like they were first among those to be 'disappointed' when in fact they made a decision not to find out.
Note Japan's bioaccumulation information was shared on May 27, 2021. The CDC, NIH, and FDA never made an effort to explain that information to the public ...for years. Instead, they watched while that data was buried by the MSM, and continued to parrot 'safe and effective'. Fauci and Wallensky both advised pregnant women to get the vax without knowing or having data to show if vax contents accumulates in the fetus, let alone the mother's vital organs.
There are countless examples of this feigned ignorance. The efficacy of the vax was stressed but no one in our medical regime pointed out the percentages (High 90s and falling...falling...falling) were all based on relative calculations instead of absolute calcuations. They relied upon us to be unaware of the difference, while at the same time we relied upon them to share their expertise in our best interests. Fauci was the highest paid employee at the time, and (too) many in the medical establishment personally reap finacial rewards for 'vaccines' developed by public funds.
I tried to share how the difference in the calculation used impacted C19 efficacy claims, but I don't think my attempt was successful. The entire Federal Medical Regime cannot say the same since they never even tried to help us understand.
Dr. McCullough was targeted for writing an excellent article which I wish I could share here, but I don't have the link.
The entire defense among the medical regime relies on a variation of, "I didn't know..." when they did in fact, know what they were telling us was false. Their education, experience, white lab coats, Federal positions of responsibility and public statements all signaled the public they knew all the facts.
They had a reason to know and a duty to know far more about the vax than they admit they know. Anthony 'The Science' Fauci was the highest paid person in the federal government. Before the rollout of the 'vaccine, they all had the ghastly Pfizer trial data which Naomi Wolf and other team members have been investigating after courts forced Pfizer to share it prior to the 75 year 'waiting period' they wanted.
Now it's time for the perpetrators to fall back on their 'disappointed expectations' and facts they 'didn't know' because it was an emergency, you see. They couldn't spend one day to test the vax for critical bioaccumulation data, even after they started to inject it as fast as they could...for years.
To: ransomnote
To: ransomnote
Also linked to my deceased brother. He ran a chain of nursing homes and had to lead by example. Each shot put him in the hospital. The last one did the job. The entire floor at U of P Hospital was occupied by all of the same men with blood cancers that were of unknown type. All had to get bone marrow transplants that never worked. All were managed as cases from outside researchers. Basically the hospital leased its floor out to Pharma researchers to study what went wrong? After six weeks they sent them all to nursing homes to die. (Ironic, huh?)
3
posted on
09/09/2025 9:55:55 AM PDT
by
blackdog
((Z28.310) "Diggin the scene with a gangster lean" (Mayfield, Curtis) )
To: ransomnote
To: Brian Griffin
Pure bloods at our house. (As far as we know 🤔)
5
posted on
09/09/2025 10:03:00 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Destroy America from within? On hold! Enlisted USN 1967 proudly. 🚫💉! 🇮🇱👍! Winning currently!)
To: ransomnote
Messing around with RNA or DNA is like opening a computer and randomly changing a part hoping to achieve whatever it is you are looking to achieve. Pharma dropped this hugely complex treatment on us with no long-term testing. Further, after the first short test, they went ahead and vaxed the people who had gotten the placebo shots, which made data collecting impossible. They probably did this because long term would have shown the vaxed people getting things like turbo cancers and the double-blind placebo types getting none of those.
I’m reminded of all the times the engineering staff wanted to drop a brand-new design into production because they were “certain” it wouldn’t have problems. Not once do I remember that working out.
6
posted on
09/09/2025 10:18:23 AM PDT
by
Gen.Blather
(Wait! I said that out loud. Sorry. )
To: ransomnote
It has been called “turbo cancer”. I believe a better term would be “warp speed cancer”.
7
posted on
09/09/2025 10:18:44 AM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution.)
To: ransomnote
To: ransomnote
From what I saw and read of your French video, it would seem the lipid would more likely be responsible for colon and pancreatic cancer than the mRNA.
It would be fairly easy to test the lipid for cancerogenic ability.
To: ransomnote
“An in silico toxicity hazard assessment for genotoxicity, a genotoxicity assessment, and a dose range finding toxicity study were performed to characterize the safety profile of Lipid-1. The in silico toxicity hazard assessment, utilizing two prediction systems DEREK and Leadscope, did not find any structural alert for mutagenicity and clastogenicity, and prediction in the statistical models were all negative.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35843341/
To: Brian Griffin
If Drtrozzi says it, we must believe! The Gold Standard of medicine! He is so knowledgeable he even has HIS OWN WEBSITE! Remind me who this guy is? Quack of the month club.
11
posted on
09/09/2025 10:36:40 AM PDT
by
brookwood
(America Was Built By MS-13. We Are A Nation Of MS-13.)
To: ransomnote
To: brookwood
“The spike protein (S2) inhibits several tumor suppressor genes (p53, BRCA1/2, RB1)[9],[10],[11] by binding to them, allowing cancerous cells to evade detection and destruction by the immune system. Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher refers to this as an “oncogenic reversal.””
This statement is ridiculous because the “spike protein” is found in every copy of the Covid virus. So if you ever had Covid you had billions of spike proteins in every part of your body. Spike proteins from the vaccine are irrelevant if you have 10 billion spike protein copies already from Covid.
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2024815118
13
posted on
09/09/2025 10:45:51 AM PDT
by
brookwood
(America Was Built By MS-13. We Are A Nation Of MS-13.)
To: ransomnote
The Dims media will blame Trump.
14
posted on
09/09/2025 10:47:41 AM PDT
by
Wuli
(uire)
To: ransomnote
After I wrote post #1, complaining about the way the MSM and medical regime buried or ignored evidence of vaccine harm, I remembered a prior post I wrote, and realized their criminal fraud was the undoing of their plans to do away with freedom. They were going to keep us locked down for years while erecting electronic surveillance systems and pretending to pursue a mythical vaccine. They wanted to collapse our economy and make us all dependent on the government for food and shelter. They were assembling their electronic surveillance systems out of patents and technology already available including vaccine passports, contact tracing, micro chipping. They were altering 'the norm' arresting people for jogging on the beach alone.
The Globalists who want us to eat bugs and have nothing were not going to let us go. The military arm of National Security was in charge of the Covid response, and treating President Trump like a national security threat (hint: 25th Amendment) whenever he said anything they didn't like. Pelosi told the public he was delusional, advising us to drink bleach etc. The medical regime sneered he was misinformed when he pushed HCQ and other alternatives.
We were never supposed to escape our 'lockdown' cages. President Trump found a way to make them think he was helping their cause, while actually breaking us out of their grasp. Operation Warp speed moved their projected 'years' (of lockdowns) to less than one year. He waved billions and billions of dollars in their faces and said he would pay them if they developed a vaccine that WORKED.
They fell over themselves developing it, and then President Trump engaged in social combat, saying 'well if the vaccine works, then people don't have to stay locked down, right?'
The Globalists tried to keep us in our cages but the alternative was if the 'vaccine' didn't work, then all those billions of dollars must be given back. The reluctantly allowed us out of our cages, but the Deep Staters kept trying to frighten us back in them (super spreader event nonsense, variants, breakthough Covid).
IF the public learned of the harms of the vax, refused the vax, and was ordered to remain in lockdown for 'public safety', we would still be locked down today, getting vaccines in exchange for food and shelter. Crickets would be on the menu.
President Trump couldn't work directly to save us - they had floated Amendment 25 repeatedly at that point. However, he could at least get us out of their cages and hope we could to the best of our ability refuse the vax. In cages, we would have zero freedom and would all be vaxxed and boosted. At large, we had freedom and had to fight the vax/boosters to the best of our ability.
President Trump turned their deceit against them, as he has done over and over again.
What I don't know, is how to make sure we never fall into the Deep State's plans to enslave us again. We were deeply divided as a nation, at a time when unity across partisan lines (and indoctrination) were needed.
United we stand. Divided we fall.
Unity is the perhaps the primary weapon we need- the Deep State has dug deep trenches to divide our nation in countless ways. We can't afford division.
15
posted on
09/09/2025 10:47:57 AM PDT
by
ransomnote
(IN GOD WE TRUST)
To: brookwood
This won’t end well for you on this thread. There’s essentially one train of thought regarding the COVID-19 vaccines. Yours aint it.
16
posted on
09/09/2025 10:52:05 AM PDT
by
Fury
To: ransomnote
To: Brian Griffin
Surge. Big surge.
The data you link was collected by the medical regime which did not want to enhance 'vaccine hesitancy'. They lied about everything - mortality expectations from Covid, number of actual deaths due to Covid, lack of efficacy of Ivermectin. Of course they did not post data indicating a cancer surge - that might slow down their plandemic. That would expose them as liars for parroting 'safe and effective'. They were hiding adverse events and horrific Pfizer trial data while telling us they had no evidence that the vax wasn't safe FOR PREGNANT women to take.
CDC and NIH propaganda from that era is not valid.
18
posted on
09/09/2025 10:56:28 AM PDT
by
ransomnote
(IN GOD WE TRUST)
To: All
SEER:
. . . age-adjusted rates for new pancreatic cancer cases have been rising on average 0.9% each year from 2013–2022. Age-adjusted death rates have been stable over 2014–2023.
19
posted on
09/09/2025 11:22:31 AM PDT
by
Owen
To: Brian Griffin
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled 17 Mechanisms Linking mRNA Shots to Cancer, Backed by Over 100 Studies, Brian Griffin wrote: |
“An in silico toxicity hazard assessment for genotoxicity, a genotoxicity assessment, and a dose range finding toxicity study were performed to characterize the safety profile of Lipid-1. The in silico toxicity hazard assessment, utilizing two prediction systems DEREK and Leadscope, did not find any structural alert for mutagenicity and clastogenicity, and prediction in the statistical models were all negative.” https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35843341/ |
According to the worthless article you linked, they were testing mRNA platform, not the "vaccine" to explore its use in rapid vaccine development. Specifically, they were testing"...an LNP containing a novel ionizable cationic lipid, Lipid-1, and three well known excipients." They were not testing the C19 'vaccine'.
Furthermore, the hi-lights of the article show that two tests were performed on lipid 1 with computer modeling, two were performed in petri dishes on lipid-2, and the dosage testing of their lipid product was performed on rabbits for two weeks. Had it been at all related to the Covid vax, it still would be worthless in it's timing, construction, scale, objectives, duration and materials etc. etc. etc..
How the times have changed! True physicians were blocked from publishing their work or having it peer-reviewed at the same time 'critics' ridiculed anything other than 'peer-reviewed research'. Now, any worthless inspection of two lipids will do.
20
posted on
09/09/2025 11:23:26 AM PDT
by
ransomnote
(IN GOD WE TRUST)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson