To: E. Pluribus Unum
I think Desert Storm was a good W. Till the media did what the media does.
3 posted on
09/06/2025 12:50:45 PM PDT by
ealgeone
To: ealgeone
That war started out good, but they didn’t go all the way. They hung the Kurds out to dry.
6 posted on
09/06/2025 12:53:02 PM PDT by
roving
To: ealgeone
Opinions differ, but Desert Storm could have included taking Baghdad and removing Saddam. We didn’t do that. Had to go back later. In my opinion, our battlefield accomplishments were stellar, but we did not fully win.
7 posted on
09/06/2025 12:54:06 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Society has no reward for following the rules any more)
To: ealgeone
I think Desert Storm was a good W.It was pretty clear what we had to do during Desert Storm. We kicked Iraq out of Kuwait. And that was a sucess.
To: ealgeone
STORMIN’ NORMAN WAS PREVENTED FROM DOING THE RIGHT THING TO WIPE OUT THE TROUBLEMAKERS, IMO.
25 posted on
09/06/2025 1:27:20 PM PDT by
ridesthemiles
(not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
To: ealgeone
We had to stop Desert Storm after 100 hours because Bush got tired of winning. He refused to recognize that Saddam was an intollerable evil because he does not believe in evil.
Apparently, President Trump NEVER gets tired of winning. Evil touched Trump on the ear and he responded with Fight Fight Fight!
57 posted on
09/06/2025 8:43:04 PM PDT by
Theophilus
(covfefe)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson