Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ealgeone

Opinions differ, but Desert Storm could have included taking Baghdad and removing Saddam. We didn’t do that. Had to go back later. In my opinion, our battlefield accomplishments were stellar, but we did not fully win.


7 posted on 09/06/2025 12:54:06 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Society has no reward for following the rules any more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

Too many business interests to take out Saddam.


9 posted on 09/06/2025 12:55:27 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

Agreed. Or another way to put it, the fighting on the ground was good, but the leadership was more focused on political winning that winning the war.


10 posted on 09/06/2025 12:55:53 PM PDT by Tell It Right (1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

If we had gone in the coalition would have collapsed and we’d be fighting alone.

The mission was just to remove the Iraq Army from Kuwait.

Mission accomplished.


12 posted on 09/06/2025 12:58:54 PM PDT by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

“In my opinion, our battlefield accomplishments were stellar, but we did not fully win.”
—————
Because politics is too important to be left to the politicians.


37 posted on 09/06/2025 1:58:10 PM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson