Gutfeld: Media, Academia, Politicians Pushed This Trans Cult and Brainwashing

Easy answer they resist such actions it’s not a normal human trait.

No, that is merely a simple answer that is wrong. Because you have accepted the narrative that sexuality is an inherited trait, instead of a learned trait. Sexual knowledge is learned, just as other knowledge that a person has.

what you have done is buy into the lies that one is born with their sexuality pre-defined for the. The truth is that at birth one is born as either a boy or a girl. In a few rare cases a person can be born with both with both ovarian and testicular tissue, a condition known as ovotesticular disorder of sex development. I personally believe that there was meant to be a boy & girl born, and somehow the genes were corrupted where the separation never took place, and instead only one being was produced. Proving that mankind still doesn't fully understand how these anomalies actually occur. But even that person will learn their sexuality of choice. They may even choose to remain non-sexual their entire life because of their abnormality.

Had you or I met someone who groomed us on sexuality, we too could have betrayed the sex we were born as, because sexuality is learned.

You are talking about two different things. We are not born with the knowledge about sex. However, DNA gives us either a male or female body. I also said, there is is a very small number of rare cases where DNA or perhaps the execution of the DNA experiences a hiccup. But we learn about sex as we age.

Why do you think the schools want to take over the learning aspect of zex? Could it be to provide confusion? I believe so. Our school system is as evil & corrupt as are many other of our institutions. Because agendas abound to destroy this nation.

But honestly, I really haven't a clue what you are trying to say with your statement, for it is incoherently stated.

What exactly do you mean with this:

Knowledge is learned is not DNA mugging is learned not a natural way of life.

It almost seems like you might be agreeing with me, but I honestly am unable to decipher what you are really trying to say. Communication with writing is very difficult, because typing can be difficult. Even I have trouble & make mistakes that fail to say what I meant to say.

From what I gather, is that in your opinion, DNA can not be corrupted.

However, the mind can be corrupted & misled using several different methods, that sadly our government has been engaged in using children & others to experiment on with success in proving that the mind can be tinkered with, and made to accept lies as the truth. Certainly you do not dispute that do you?

There is evidence that DNA can be corrupted. Medical intervention is one way, while intermixing with family is another way, theoretically. That is one of the reason they made laws against interfamily-marriages in this nation, though there were other considerations as well.

The prohibition of marriage between blood relatives, known as consanguineous marriage, has been influenced by a combination of social, religious, legal, and medical concerns throughout history. Anthropologists and historians suggest that such prohibitions were introduced to maintain social order, uphold religious morality, and safeguard the creation of healthy offspring.

Early arguments often framed cousin marriage, particularly parallel-cousin marriage, as a remnant of a more primitive stage of human social organization.

By the 19th century, figures like Lewis Henry Morgan promoted the idea that marriages between unrelated persons were advantageous, as they would "increase the vigor of the stock" and avoid the "evils of consanguine marriage".

Legally, prohibitions on marriage between blood relatives became codified in various jurisdictions. In the United States, the first state to ban cousin marriage was Kansas in 1858, followed by several other states in the 1860s, with the trend continuing until the mid-1920s.

These laws were often enacted by western states that were writing their marriage codes from scratch as territories or newly admitted states.

The rationale for these laws was partly based on the perceived risks of genetic disorders in offspring from such unions, although modern genetic counseling organizations have stated that first-cousin couples should be treated no differently than other partners for reproductive genetic testing and counseling.

Despite these historical and legal concerns, the justification for such bans has been questioned. The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws recommended in 1970 that states remove restrictions on first-cousin marriage, reflecting a shift in legal thinking.

Furthermore, the Model Penal Code excludes first cousins from the class of blood relatives between whom marriage or cohabitation should be criminalized.

This indicates that the legal basis for such prohibitions has evolved, with contemporary views placing greater emphasis on individual autonomy and the lack of significant genetic risk in many cases.

But that isn't the only thing that evolved, and in many cases they are wrong. Two are homosexuality & transgenderism. They were not born as either. Instead, "experts" have convinced people that their theories, that they are born that way, have been sold & accepted as the reality.

I contend that sexuality deviancy are learned behavioral conditions & have nothing to do with DNA.

There are far move than just the deviancy of homosexuals & transgenders. There is sadomasochisms, people who want to wear diapers & act like babies & the list goes on and on. I no desire to learn all of the deviations in sexual behavior.

I believe most, if not all, of these sexual deviances are caused by untreated mental illness that these people have learned through introduction. They are not natural, nor are they the result of DNA in any way.

The "experts" have created these excuses to sow chaos & confusion in order to destroy this nation & perhaps all of humanity.

These "experts" are evil people, with evil intentions, period.

Your confused with reality to try and sell an idea that is not factual or normal.

Right back at ya. You have no evidence that your statement is factual, nor does it even make logical sense. People are not born with sexual knowledge or even understanding. It's a learned process and depending on who you learn from & accept & trust them, are the source that your knowledge is acquired on the subject of sex.

But hey, if you want to believe the lies, which is where your belief has come from, than far be it for me to interfere with your inaccurate belief that sex is not something that is learned.

There is a vast amount of reporting stating that transgenders are being cajoled into believing that they are trapped in the wrong gendered body.

Parents Are Fed Up With Public Schools Secretly Transitioning Children

Perhaps you also believe that they are confused with reality trying to ret to sell an idea that is not factual or normal.

BTW, I never claimed that their belief is normal, in fact I said that they suffer mental illness.

Brainwashing has nothing to deal with it. They are seeking acceptance, and they are getting it via acceptance of them and agreeing with them that they are stuck in the wrong gendered body.

But again, you are free to believe whatever you want to believe. I do not care about changing your mind, I am tryinf to tell you the reality. That being that people are not born with knowledge or even understanding of the topic of sex. Sex is a learned experience, and some people are easily convinced by being told that they are correct, that they are in the wrong body, instead of countering their misbelief and told that they are not stuck in the wrong gendered body.

Others see the attention they get, and so they too are moved to claim that they are transgenders.

No human being is born gay or transgendered or any of the other sexual deviancies that exist beyond those two deviancies, regardless of what you falsely believe.

I bet you have never even known a gay, and if you did you never engaged them is any serious conversation. I have, and every one of them has told me that indeed they had dreams about it, and that these dreams stemmed from experiences they read or heard from others. Those experiences got into their psyche, and played upon their weaknesses that grew into desires. Others have told me that they had close friends that got them involved in the sexual perversion.

DNA played no role whatsoever. It was introduction, and their weakness to to secure a relationship that they were never able to experience. Loneliness is boring, as the saying goes.

Otherwise, how do you explain those who walk-away, & never return to that deviant lifestyle?

I will give you the last word, because I no longer have the time to engage in conversation with. I have better things to do then waste my time with someone who can't even communicate with logic who says I say things that I never said to you.

Learning plays numerous important roles in sexual development. Yet, the possible impacts on sexuality, of learning from experience, are rarely included in discussions of the organization of behavioral sex differences and the differentiation of psychosexual function.

Including 'learned sexuality' in the organization of sexual behavior

Again, your views on homosexuality are learned. You had a good teacher, who taught you that homosexual behavior is not normal. Which begs me ask why you chose Wikipedia of all places? Wikipedia which is okay on some topics, however, when it comes to topics that pertain to politics, and societal narrative norms, they always take the liberal viewpoint & promote it as being the gospel.

What possible reason can you come up with that makes you decide I am trying to lie to you on the topic?

Seems to me, that you just cannot accept that II am telling the truth when I say that sex is a learned experience, and those who learn from the wrong person risk engaging in activities that are not good. You do believe that evil people exist right? You do believe that evil people spread misinformation don't you? are you saying that my view is one of evil? How so, I do not promote that the ides that homosexual behavior is good. You on the other hand are trying to say that people are born as homosexuals.

Now you have the last word, and I will keep my promise not to answer, because it's not worth it for me to continue this discussion.

Believe whatever you want to believe.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.