Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert DeLong

Knowledge is learned is not DNA mugging is learned not a natural way of life.


25 posted on 08/30/2025 11:43:04 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Vaduz
You are talking about two different things. We are not born with the knowledge about sex. However, DNA gives us either a male or female body. I also said, there is is a very small number of rare cases where DNA or perhaps the execution of the DNA experiences a hiccup. But we learn about sex as we age.

Why do you think the schools want to take over the learning aspect of zex? Could it be to provide confusion? I believe so. Our school system is as evil & corrupt as are many other of our institutions. Because agendas abound to destroy this nation.

But honestly, I really haven't a clue what you are trying to say with your statement, for it is incoherently stated.

What exactly do you mean with this:

Knowledge is learned is not DNA mugging is learned not a natural way of life.

It almost seems like you might be agreeing with me, but I honestly am unable to decipher what you are really trying to say. Communication with writing is very difficult, because typing can be difficult. Even I have trouble & make mistakes that fail to say what I meant to say.

From what I gather, is that in your opinion, DNA can not be corrupted.

However, the mind can be corrupted & misled using several different methods, that sadly our government has been engaged in using children & others to experiment on with success in proving that the mind can be tinkered with, and made to accept lies as the truth. Certainly you do not dispute that do you?

There is evidence that DNA can be corrupted. Medical intervention is one way, while intermixing with family is another way, theoretically. That is one of the reason they made laws against interfamily-marriages in this nation, though there were other considerations as well.

The prohibition of marriage between blood relatives, known as consanguineous marriage, has been influenced by a combination of social, religious, legal, and medical concerns throughout history. Anthropologists and historians suggest that such prohibitions were introduced to maintain social order, uphold religious morality, and safeguard the creation of healthy offspring.

Early arguments often framed cousin marriage, particularly parallel-cousin marriage, as a remnant of a more primitive stage of human social organization.

By the 19th century, figures like Lewis Henry Morgan promoted the idea that marriages between unrelated persons were advantageous, as they would "increase the vigor of the stock" and avoid the "evils of consanguine marriage".

Legally, prohibitions on marriage between blood relatives became codified in various jurisdictions. In the United States, the first state to ban cousin marriage was Kansas in 1858, followed by several other states in the 1860s, with the trend continuing until the mid-1920s.

These laws were often enacted by western states that were writing their marriage codes from scratch as territories or newly admitted states.

The rationale for these laws was partly based on the perceived risks of genetic disorders in offspring from such unions, although modern genetic counseling organizations have stated that first-cousin couples should be treated no differently than other partners for reproductive genetic testing and counseling.

Despite these historical and legal concerns, the justification for such bans has been questioned. The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws recommended in 1970 that states remove restrictions on first-cousin marriage, reflecting a shift in legal thinking.

Furthermore, the Model Penal Code excludes first cousins from the class of blood relatives between whom marriage or cohabitation should be criminalized.

This indicates that the legal basis for such prohibitions has evolved, with contemporary views placing greater emphasis on individual autonomy and the lack of significant genetic risk in many cases.

But that isn't the only thing that evolved, and in many cases they are wrong. Two are homosexuality & transgenderism. They were not born as either. Instead, "experts" have convinced people that their theories, that they are born that way, have been sold & accepted as the reality.

I contend that sexuality deviancy are learned behavioral conditions & have nothing to do with DNA.

There are far move than just the deviancy of homosexuals & transgenders. There is sadomasochisms, people who want to wear diapers & act like babies & the list goes on and on. I no desire to learn all of the deviations in sexual behavior.

I believe most, if not all, of these sexual deviances are caused by untreated mental illness that these people have learned through introduction. They are not natural, nor are they the result of DNA in any way.

The "experts" have created these excuses to sow chaos & confusion in order to destroy this nation & perhaps all of humanity.

These "experts" are evil people, with evil intentions, period.

26 posted on 08/30/2025 12:54:14 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson