Posted on 08/25/2025 4:00:22 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
![]() |
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
If they were hostile we would have been attacked many years ago.
Sightings go back a lot farther than that.
Yes they do. I was just using a rough number to get back to a time near Roswell and Trinity.
If, IF something from out there was able to arrive here, it could damn well hover wherever the heck it desires.
My wife was listening to a podcast about Steven G. noted UFO “expert.” Mr G states that he himself has communicated with aliens. He takes people out to an area where, he says, he has talked to aliens previously. He charges $2,500 per person to “experience” his contact. He has electronics he claims to be useful to connect and talk with them. On at least one of these sojourns, he failed. How he explained the failure told me everything I needed to know. He stated there were “doubters” in the crowd, so the aliens declined to converse this time.
As far as any real aliens, from a galaxy far, far away, it is just as likely that “they” will intercept images of San Francisco, Lost Angeless, and bypass Earth altogether. Who could blame them.
Which nation did the natives blame for more advanced technology than theirs?
Several of the fishermen I talked too that fished up in Alaska talked about the weird underwater alien stuff they’d seen - I figured they were just yanking my chain.
How can you have an underwater UFO? It isn’t ’Flying’, and it’s not even ‘Floating’. Is it ‘Flippering’?
It is evident he didn’t have access to all the classified material.
The probably aren't. There has been scuttlebutt for years about underwater "fast movers" and trans-medium sightings.
Are they lurking at the bottom of Challenger Deep? 👀
Because they have been seen entering and leaving the water.
Would you settle tor a picture of Jacqueline Bisset in “The Deep?”
Hostility is an anthropocentric assumption. They don’t need to attack us to work against our best interests.
What if their purpose is more subtle—like harvesting our souls? What if they are what the Bible calls demons?
Perhaps they cunningly took over the political party, say the Democrats? And then, destroy us from within!
Tucker was saying this a couple years ago. He said he saw/heard of evidence that the UFOs are in the oceans.
They could certainly be that; however, why would a demon need a ship? They can stalk us without all of that stuff. I don't think ships would improve their chances for "possession".
How can you have an underwater UFO? It isn’t ’Flying’, and it’s not even ‘Floating’. Is it ‘Flippering’?
https://media.ufologyweb.com/articles/from-ufos-to-uaps
expect new terminology shortly.
They are particularly interested in human sex.
But then, who isn't.;-)
For the same reason the Greeks needed a giant wooden horse.
As an aside, it has been suggested that not all demons are like the berserkers that possess people. It's infinitely more complex than that.
Once again, an anthropocentric idea. Think about this issue from a (dark) spiritual perspective.
Abductees say that the beings who abduct them are "tricksters."
Now do some research on Jung's trickster archetype.
What you end up with is a slowly developing image of what some people have dealt with—beings that, in the Bible, might have been roughly called fallen angels (or extentions thereof).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.