Posted on 08/12/2025 4:54:11 AM PDT by Cronos
Claire Hope from Vancouver has just turned 18. Her mother is a real-estate agent, her father a lawyer. Last week, Claire reportedly made more than $1 million in less than three hours, after announcing the launch of her OnlyFans “bday special” on Instagram with a picture of herself sticking her middle fingers up at the camera. She wears a cropped t-shirt embroidered with the phrase “porn star in training”, promising “all content shot at 12.01am on my 18th birthday”. Claire first became famous as a sweary child rapper on YouTube, performing under the name Lil Tay. It is this persona, a nine-year-old schoolgirl in a puffer jacket waving around wads of cash, which the buyers of her OnlyFans will best recall.
Tia Billinger is 26 and from Nottinghamshire. She didn’t know her dad growing up and was raised by a stepdad. She married young and took up a job in financial recruitment for the NHS. Earlier this year, she was reportedly making around $250,000 a month from OnlyFans under the nom de guerre Bonnie Blue. In June, she was banned from the platform. Blue is a PR nightmare and a pornographer’s dream.
... For milquetoast feminists.. it is the “stigmatisation” of “sex workers” that kills them. In reality, it is male pornographers, clients and pimps who grip women’s necks, pump them with sedatives, and grind their personhood into the mud.
(Excerpt) Read more at unherd.com ...
![]() |
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Sodom and Gomorrah
A Mother and Father sucessful in their professions, complete failures as parents.
And, in Canada, very high income tax on the income.
1 Timothy 6:10 NLT
[10] “For the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil. And some people, craving money, have wandered from the true faith and pierced themselves with many sorrows.”
Money in and of itself is not the problem, but a means to exist in this world....but like so many other things, prescription drugs, sex and even the internet, people begin to use those things for reasons they’ve received not meant for.
Mark my words.
We need to get back to promoting godly ways. Strangling = sex?
Yet the left will not admit that modern ‘entertainment’ is anything but the exploitation of minors. Just what are they being exposed to, at young ages, where they enter into this 1 minute after becoming of age?
I don’t understand why URL’s for porn don’t require an .xxx extension, making it far easier for parents to block certain content.
We MUST find ways of protecting our children from the perv industry while growing up. The internet has given them far too close a reach to our young, they exploit it in every way possible.
Then some condone dropping drag queens in front of 1st graders. The adults aren’t adults. As a society we’re way off the rails.
I bet you’re right.
It will only get worse. Sooner or later AI will get into the act and the only limits will be that of imagination.
There are reports of many of these big earning girls having one or two “super supporters” who provide the bulk of their revenue. They will have a few hundred followers who provide them with a little bit of income and then one or two who provide them with hundreds or thousands of dollars in income.
It makes it appear that this is a lucrative occupation when in reality the average OF performer earns $150 per month selling their soul.
The big question is who are these 1 or 2 mega supporters and where is that money coming from? I would not be surprised if it was USAID/Congress for Cultural Freedom/Soros/etc...type of organizations who are promoting this lifestyle to our young girls in an effort to corrupt them and damage our young men.
Yup. Being a porn “star” or whore is bad. Who knew? [/s]
Hard for me to cry too much. I know working class people barely scraping by who lost fingers working in a factory.
She makes 250K a month. Even if Canada is 50 percent in taxes, that’s still 125K a month. I doubt taxes are an issue.
It’s easy to protect kids, it’s called EMP. Sadly nothing short of a several of those are going to alter anything. Raise them with Jesus and pray over them constantly.
Because it isn't effective. Every fully qualified domain name resolves to an IP address that your browser uses - you cannot prevent anyone -- certainly not the site owners -- from buying additional domain names and have them resolve to the (same IP addresses used by the) site. IP addresses can change as well. You're setting yourself up for a permanent game of whack-a-mole.
I think the right way to keep kids away from porn is to explain what it is, why it's bad, and actively discourage them from seeking it out. There's so much of it that you really can't (figuratively) keep it in the closet. So, like alcohol and cigarettes, (and now) recreational drugs, we now have to educate children to avoid it.
There is a reason that the sex trade is "the oldest profession." Going back centuries.
The .xxx domain was first proposed in 2000 and has been around since 2011 but it's apparently not the solution.
The notion that content providers could use it voluntarily was moot once they realized providers intended to post the same content on both .xxx and .com domains.
In addition to a censorship issue, voluntary use of the .xxx domain could lead to legislation making it mandatory but the definition of "sexually explicit" is inconsistent.
Jurisdiction is also an issue. What is legal in one municipality, county, state, or country could be illegal in others. The implementers of a law forcing "sexually explicit" content onto a .xxx domain will likely find they have no authority to block any content at all.
That reads like textbook money laundering, including laundering taxpayer money. The Irritainment Industry is rife with money laundering and this is just another means of carrying it out.
Well...I didn’t mean ‘voluntarily’. We have ‘adult content’ laws. Same reason ‘video stores’ had to have separate areas for adult movies. Providing porn to minors is illegal, make it illegal to post on .com domains.
I’m not sure about jurisdiction, but we always managed to have laws to protect this content from kids before.
Defining it is an issue.
The argument could also be made the other way: keep the kids off the .com domains and restrict them to .kid ones. That's a very slippery slope. Next they'll be telling 18 year-olds they can't buy alcohol or purchase handguns until they're 21.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.