[SunkenCiv]

 

Photo: Ancient Architects

[these images are primitive, almost toylike, and nearly 25 years old. I think it’ll all turn out to be an artifact of the technology, IOW, natural formations that got dumbed down by the technology then in use, as the so-called "Face on Mars" turned out to be.]

[ansel12]

Ancient people must have had huge lungs to live in such cities, or gills.

[Governor Dinwiddie]

For a long as humans exist, we will never, ever run out of lost cities, alien pyramids, faces on mars, ancient astronauts, and lost civilizations.

[BenLurkin]

I always figured they were fake.

[logi_cal869]

Here we go again.

Round & round... /s

[1of10]

“thriving urban center”

..... midden

[Ronaldus Magnus III]

I’m not saying it’s aliens, but.............

[BradyLS]

I visited the site. I looked at the photos.

There’s no sense of scale. If those are supposed to be buildings on a scale for human habitation, then the water is deep, extremely clear, and the sunlight (or artificial light) remarkably broad in its luminescence.

I am skeptical to the point of disbelief. But interested to know more.

[crusty old prospector]

Go back down there with a better camera.

[Beowulf9]

You know who made them...

[ModelBreaker]

I bet the NY times will announce that the ancient Cubans had universal health care and the best education in the western hemisphere.

[Paladin2]

This proves that Karl Marx was right!

[Somehow in the minds of Marxists...]

[pepsi_junkie]

If confirmed, the site could be over 6,000 years old, making it about 1,500 years older than the Pyramids of Giza.

[Bullish]

That’s no geological formation. To think that’s even possible is ridiculous.

[atc23]

Golbecki Tepe is 10,000 years BCE and anyone can see that site for themselves. The facts point to at least one advanced civilization existing up to the Younger Dryas (sic) No need to go diving in Cuba necessarily

[Tellurian]

My guess: bismuth crystals. Probably an inch high.

[Sirius Lee]

Cameras and LIDAR have gotten better, and underwater robots have gotten much, much cheaper. Why not just drop one in and do a scan now?

History Channel could do it for pennies on the revenue dollar.

[PIF]

6,000 years ago is not nearly old enough to have that site at 14,000 ft below sea level at the surface, as the water level only fell 150-400 feet world wide.

There would have to have been one or more major subsidences to lower the site so far down.

[Pete Dovgan]

Here is what I don’t get.

They found this in 2001, and there has been almost no evidence to document the site. Yes, it’s deep, but no sub footage and no core samples reported. Why?

[yesthatjallen]

Manipulated image. Fake.