I would love to see the case investigated, the allegations found to be true, people put into prison, and — at that point — circle back and talk to the parents and ask them, “Who told you to be silent?”
Good point.
I was thinking along those lines too. Maybe they need to work from back to front instead. First find all the communications to the Rich family, offer them witness security, and find out from them where to look, because if it was just a “normal” MS-13 hit as claimed, there would not have been threats made to the family. So the threats to silence the Rich family and the hits on the guy who was investigating the whole thing (I forgot his name) would be places to start, to disprove the official narrative.
Another place to start would be the hospital personnel who heard him talking when he arrived to the hospital. If I understand correctly, the hit that killed him actually happened in the hospital, because he was doing fine and was expected to survive until he suddenly died. Somebody correct me if I’m wrong on that. If I’ve got that right, that also would be an indicator that this was not just a “normal” MS-13 hit. This involved somebody who was at the hospital. Did he get a visit at the hospital from somebody at FBI or CIA and then suddenly died at the hospital? I wish I could remember the details.
The parents were pestered by people who had suspicions but no evidence and reacted as grieving parents would. They had no reason to believe that their son would leak the emails. Was there a reason? A real reason, supported by evidence, not just suspicion and surmise.