Arrests are important not more answers to questions
“Arrests are important not more answers to questions”
I think it’ll happen. Trump is going to pay them back in spades for why they did to him and this country.
Between June, 1972 and July, 1973, Democrats slowly leaked Watergate materials against President Nixon, climaxing in the dramatic reveal of the Oval Office audiotapes.
We now know they probably had those tapes from the beginning. But they waited, patiently, for twelve months, to drop the most incriminating evidence at the end. It was a slowly mounting campaign of political pressure culminating with a death blow.
The RussiaGate scandal is a thousand times worse than Watergate.
The Trump Administration appears to be following the Watergate playbook, except maybe on a faster timeline (at the speed of Trump). If I’m right, then we’re not watching documents being released in real time; we’re seeing an orchestrated sequence of increasingly damning information trickling out on a pre-planned schedule.
Remember— they don’t have to prove the case in public. The public disclosure campaign only needs to persuade 51% of the public that arrests aren’t irrational. Once that low threshold is met, arrests can begin, and then the DOJ must prove its cases in court.
As Scott Adams explained, arrests of top intelligence officials (and even the former president) long seemed unthinkable. But step-by-step, the disclosures of a cohesive, interlocking architecture of evidence is making the idea of arrests not only thinkable— but necessary.
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/thinkable-friday-august-1-2025-c