Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA DIRECTOR: Indictments coming
X ^ | July 28 | John Ratcliffe

Posted on 07/28/2025 3:05:33 AM PDT by RandFan

@GuntherEagleman

🚨 BREAKING: CIA Director John Ratcliffe just confirmed that John Brennan, James Comey, and Hillary Clinton are likely to be INDICTED over their involvement in Russiagate!

(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: bondibashing; bondiwhiners; bondiwhining; brennan; clinton; comey; coup; domesticenemies; eeyoresoffr; fusiongps; hitlery; obama; russiagate; surrendermonkeys; surrendermonkeysoffr

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
This is interesting he basically told Maria that indictments will be forthcoming... 👀

He didn't name anyone specifically but Maria suggested Brennan, Comey, Clapper.

1 posted on 07/28/2025 3:05:33 AM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RandFan

We will see. These folks have been above the law since forever.


2 posted on 07/28/2025 3:17:59 AM PDT by MarlonRando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

COVFEFE COVFAFO


3 posted on 07/28/2025 3:20:09 AM PDT by VRW Conspirator ( Now open: DOW - Department of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

4 posted on 07/28/2025 3:24:33 AM PDT by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarlonRando

‘CIA DIRECTOR: Indictments coming’

I’ll believe it when I see it.


5 posted on 07/28/2025 3:28:03 AM PDT by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Trump already passed on Hillary giving all her emails to China. He’s passing on Obama now. This crop will simply say they did what their boss, Barry, asked.


6 posted on 07/28/2025 3:29:52 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No name given ; 9YearLurker

I understand the skepticsm but the administration are telegraphing indictments to the media. There’s a few articles about it now so let’s see....

Probably wont be Clinton, Obama or anyone “pardoned” so who does that leave? Almost certainly their underlings.


7 posted on 07/28/2025 3:32:56 AM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher

yup!


8 posted on 07/28/2025 3:34:58 AM PDT by captnemo1 (online since 1983 not being younger just smarter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

And the underlings will use the Barry-instructed-us defense.


9 posted on 07/28/2025 3:35:37 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

That has never been a legal defense against breaking the law.


10 posted on 07/28/2025 3:38:56 AM PDT by Skwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Heard I’ll before...all irrelevant until indictments, arrest, conviction and imprisonment. Anything less is unacceptable.


11 posted on 07/28/2025 3:40:01 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
This crop will simply say they did what their boss, Barry, asked.

How'd that work out for ya, Oberst Eichmann?

12 posted on 07/28/2025 3:41:24 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Nullius in verba)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Skwor

It will be used in the context of having reason to doubt that the intel assessments were complete or correct.


13 posted on 07/28/2025 3:42:45 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

But with it, they’ll cast doubt on their knowing that the intel reports were indeed false.


14 posted on 07/28/2025 3:43:19 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Indict Epstein’s clients.


15 posted on 07/28/2025 3:44:21 AM PDT by ArcadeQuarters (You can't remove RINOs by voting for them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
And the underlings will use the Barry-instructed-us defense.

That worked brilliantly for the Watergate defendants. This is MUCH more serious than Watergate. A lot will depend on venue. The chances of anyone getting a fair trial in Washington DC in a politically charged case asymptotically approach zero the closer to Obama or Trump you get. J6 defendants had about as much a chance of acquittal as Claus Stauffenberg. Russiagate defendants will have about as much chance of conviction in DC as OJ in Watts.

16 posted on 07/28/2025 3:47:12 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Nullius in verba)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

If indeed arrests and indictments are coming, the prosecution will need to move to change the venue out of the DC district courts. Their judges and 93% Democrat juries have zero interest in justice.They are just as slimy as the defendants in the dock


17 posted on 07/28/2025 3:48:27 AM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Separate juries can believe separate things. When you use contradictory defenses, “Obama made me do it” and “I was ignorant” the jury is entitled to infer that you are as guilty as Hell, and the prosecutor is entitled to remind the jury of the contradiction.

Asserting inconsistent defenses is tantamount to an admission of guilt.

“I dindu nuttin and the muffin-flucker was axing for it.” is not a brilliant defense.


18 posted on 07/28/2025 3:55:18 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Nullius in verba)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Ratcliffe seemed to be saying that there are criminal referrals and the outcomes will be based on the information gathered. False alarm...”indictments will be coming” was not said.,more like the “possibility of indictments”,....Trump is doing payback...trying to force those creeps into defense mode..seeing how they react ...going to hound them as long as he can...maybe they will physically break...might be Trumps goal...let them squirm for a loooong time..in the meantime painting them as the slimebags they are...for all to remember


19 posted on 07/28/2025 3:57:15 AM PDT by Getready (Wisdom is more valuable than gold and harder to find. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Yep.


20 posted on 07/28/2025 3:59:51 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson