One it cuts state revenue. Two since dems dont stop criminals and instead subsidize them through their policies, this will surely hamper crimnals efforts to harm and take what they want from CA citizens. Third dems hate anything that truly allows citizens to defend themselves against criminals, because that also means government criminals, because socialists know exactly what they themselves are, and dont want citizens to ever be able to defend against government criminals.
Now if we could just get back to 20-round magazines and legalizing silencers to facilitate target practice I’d be set.
In reality, it takes both a court ruling, AND CA law enforcement informing the (in and out of state) ammunition sellers that the background checks are no longer needed. I haven't seen yet where this has taken place.
Asinine, but true.
How does this effect IL?
/sarc
It takes one legislative session to enact an unconstitutional law. It has taken 9 years to get this one revoked. Many others longer and still counting. Something has to change.
Saving the taxpayers a few bucks
I guess Californians won’t have to go out of state to buy ammo unless this ruling is stayed.
California voters approved Proposition 63 by a nearly 2-1 vote. It was not even close. The turnout was 75%.
An nice side effect is that my local Sportsman’s Warehouse put a nice selection of ammo on sale just a tad cheaper than Midway.
Bkmk
“Voter approved.” That says it all for any hope that California will join the ranks of hormality.
So can CA residents buy, sell, trade, give ammo to each other without CA govt. interaction?
Do WA next.