Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 07/24/2025 1:06:51 PM PDT by libh8er
Billionaire mogul David Geffen has rubbished his estranged boytoy husband's explosive claims that he's a sex and drug-crazed abuser.
Geffen, 82, branded 32 year-old Donovan Michaels' divorce filing allegations 'false and pathetic'.
Donovan Michaels, 32, alleges that his billionaire beau Geffen, 82, forced him to take drugs, subjected him to abusive sex and controlled his every move, according to the latest lawsuit in their messy divorce battle.
...
The pair met in 2016 on SeekingArrangements.com, a dating website often used by rich people looking for younger partners.
Geffen, a movie and music producer worth about $9 billion, allegedly paid Michaels $10,000 for sex on the night they met, according to the lawsuit filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court.
The pair would go on to form a relationship and ultimately married in 2023 without a prenup, according to the complaint.
Michaels said in the complaint that he was targeted by Geffen because he was a vulnerable, marginalized young gay black man who spent the majority of his life bouncing around in the foster care system before turning to erotic dancing to make ends meet.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Billionaire David Geffen, 82, lashes out at sex and drugs claims made by husband, 32,...
Wait.... what?......................
men cannot have husbands.
Rich faggot and his boy toy, let’s call this what it is.
“The suit also claims that Geffen enjoyed physically dominating his sexual partners and causing them pain, which triggered Michaels’ childhood trauma. This allegedly caused him digestive issues, headaches and a desire to isolate himself.”
Painful sodomy caused digestive issues. Wow who would have thought that could happen? ?
“Rich faggot and his boy toy, let’s call this what it is.”
Less-Rich faggot with independently wealthy former boy toy.
How does 82 year old make that 32 year old do anything? Is he held prisoner?
Much as I might snicker at old men with far younger women, I get downright nauseous at this scenario.
Oh wow, a gay cowboy. That lends to all sorts of commentary from which I will refrain. I was watching a documentary about Joni Mitchell recently and she blames Geffen for making her miss Woodstock, “the most important cultural event of her generation.” I think she was better off not going to that swine-infested mud pit.
$$$$
As I suggested yesterday in the first thread on this topic, he needs to just cut the guy a check for $20 million and be done with it. Between short term spousal support, long term after dissolution is entered, for half of the two year marriage, his attorneys fees, the other guy’s attorneys fees which he’s going to be ordered to pay due to the differential in access to resources, he’s going to end up paying that much anyway, so he might as well pay it, get an NDA, and be done with it
I don’t think she would see it that way even though we might. Different worlds.
The pair would go on to form a relationship and ultimately married in 2023 without a prenup, according to the complaint.
They’re so cute at that age.
Nailed it!
Isn’t Geffen a friend of the Clintons? Threw a huge campaign event years ago for Hillary in Hollywood that was kind of IFFY...Don’t remember details.
How did the “boy toy” go from a husband to a beau? Again - it’s the lousy writing....about lousy people...
Degenerates. Puke.
Sick fuk Geffen is. I’m sure UCLA’s Medical School named after him won’t be distancing themselves from his money anytime soon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.