Posted on 07/21/2025 5:53:51 AM PDT by Eleutheria5
When you are accused, criticized, or attacked, what is your first instinct? To defend yourself. To explain your intentions. To set the record straight. But Niccolò Machiavelli, the master strategist of power, would tell you this is a fatal error. Every word you spend on defense is a word that solidifies your position as the weak one, the one on trial. You are playing their game, on their terms, and you have already lost. In this brutally effective video, “NEVER Defend Yourself - Machiavelli’s Trick to Flip the Power Instantly,” we break down one of the most potent psychological tactics for seizing control in any confrontation. Inspired by the timeless wisdom of The Prince, we reveal why defending yourself bleeds your power and legitimizes the attack. The true master of power does not stoop to explain; they reframe, they deflect, they attack the attacker's premise, or, most powerfully, they use strategic silence and contempt to shatter their opponent's confidence. This isn't about being passive; it's about refusing to be the defendant in a court you didn't create. Learn the specific techniques to instantly flip the power dynamic, forcing your accuser onto the defensive and making them regret their attack. This is the art of turning a shield into a sword. If you are tired of being put on the back foot in arguments, negotiations, or social conflicts, this video will arm you with a mindset that is both liberating and ruthlessly effective. Understand the game, and you will never feel the need to defend your position again. Thank you for watching. To master more strategies that give you the ultimate advantage, subscribe to our channel and join a community dedicated to the art of power.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
![]() |
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
“Trump is using Macchiavelli for…”
Please provide a quote from Trump stating that he emulates Machiavelli. Otherwise take it back
I am sure it is a tactic that has been used successfully since Sun Tsu wrote. His quote is probably found in his discussion of alliances.
Trump just said that you’re a fool, who has to hear a direct quote and cannot analyze actions. Macchiavelli provides tools, and Trump utilizes one of those tools, consciously or unconsciously. Take it or leave it, and stop wasting my time.
“Someone Machiavellian is sneaky, cunning, and lacking a moral code. The word comes from the Italian philosopher Niccolò Machiavelli, who wrote bla bla bla”
I’m just defending Trump
Calling people fools on this forum is actually against the rules. Ad Homenim attacks are not allowed
You might see if you can make your points without using the leftist tactic of using emotional argumentation. I recommend intelligence and logic.
Bookmark
Dad always said, “Deny, deny, deny.” It is hard for an instinctively honest person to go on the offensive when accused.
I’ll watch.
“Someone Machiavellian is sneaky, cunning, and lacking a moral code. The word comes from the Italian philosopher Niccolò Machiavelli, who wrote bla bla bla”
Common usage is not a definition. Macchiaveli wrote The Prince, which was a comprehensive treatise on statecraft in his time. Here one of the principles enumerated in Macchiavelli’s treatise is on display, and it’s not telling anyone to be “sneaky or cunning or lacking a moral code”. Watch the video.
I’m just defending Trump
Nobody’s attacking Trump.
“Calling people fools on this forum is actually against the rules. Ad Homenim attacks are not allowed”
Nobody made an ad hominem attack, which is something entirely different. I called you a fool because you confuse “common usage” with the actual thoughts of one of the first political scientists of the Rennaisance. On the contrary, you are making an ad hominem attack on Macchiavelli. You are a fool, and the more you talk, the more you prove it.
Enjoyed the video, especially the color. 25 minutes-10 minutes too long.
Oh geeze
Gosh, golly. Are you going to be joining Veronica and Betty at Pop’s for malts? Graduate High School. Grownups have no time for you.
Transcript, as generated by YT:
There’s a moment, a silent split-second
decision you make when someone calls you
out, accuses you, questions your worth,
your character, your intent, and in that
moment, the average person does what
they were trained to do. They defend
themselves. I didn’t mean it. That’s not
what I was trying to say. You
misunderstood me. I swear I’m not like
that. It sounds noble, reasonable, fair.
But to Makaveli, it’s the moment you
lose everything. Because the second you
defend yourself, you admit you’re weak
enough to need to. And in power games,
perception is everything. If they see
you flinch, they don’t see a victim.
They see blood. This is the brutal law
Makaveli understood before anyone else.
The man who defends himself lowers
himself. The man who doesn’t forces the
world to defend him instead. Let’s get
one thing straight. Defending yourself
rarely convinces anyone. What it does is
shift the power away from you. Because
when you justify your actions, you’re
playing on their field. You’re accepting
their framing. You’re saying without
realizing it, you have the authority to
question me. And once they have that,
they own the narrative. Even if you’re
right, you still look guilty because
only the weak rush to explain. The
strong, they let the silence burn. They
let the accusation float untouched
because they know the real move is this.
Turn the accusation into a mirror. Make
them doubt themselves. Make them look
too emotional. Make them look obsessed,
bitter, unstable. Because the one who
speaks first often loses control of the
frame. And Makaveli knew whoever
controls the frame controls the outcome.
Most people defend themselves because
they want to be understood. They believe
if they just explain enough, clarify
enough, repeat themselves enough,
they’ll be vindicated. But that belief
comes from a place of emotional
weakness, not strategy. You don’t want
clarity. You want control. Clarity is
for therapy. Control is for power. And
power doesn’t come from being
understood. It comes from being feared,
respected, and untouchable. So when
someone calls you arrogant, cold,
selfish, manipulative, and you
immediately say, “No, you don’t
understand. You’ve already lost because
now you’re reacting. Now you’re proving
you care. Now you’ve put the ball in
their court. And when you do that, you
give up the most machavellian thing you
have. Mystery. Think of the most
powerful people you’ve ever encountered.
Not the loudest, not the most liked. The
ones who held silence like a weapon. The
ones who made you second-guess yourself
just by staring. The ones who when
attacked never flinched. Mchavelli would
tell you this. He who explains submits.
He who remains silent forces others to
fill in the blanks and they often
overestimate him. That’s the game. When
you don’t react, they get uncomfortable.
They start doubting their own words.
They look around for validation and find
none. Suddenly, their power shrinks
while yours expands. Because you’ve done
the one thing no emotional person can
handle. You made them talk to
themselves. And that’s how you flip the
power. You let their accusation die in
the echo of its own weakness. Let’s go
deeper. You walk into a room. Someone
throws shade, subtle or direct. Maybe a
jab at your success, your attitude, your
past. Everyone turns to see what you’ll
say, and hears your move. Say nothing.
No defense, no retaliation, no smirk,
just calm, total stillness. In that
moment, you are untouchable because
everyone in the room is now forced to
ask, “Why didn’t he react? Does he know
something we don’t? Is he above this?
Did that attack just make him stronger?
You just flipped the entire social
frame.” Because people aren’t watching
the accusation. They’re watching your
response. And silence, when delivered
with presence, speaks louder than any
justification ever could. Makaveli knew
this. He didn’t just study politics. He
studied psychology. And he understood
one thing better than anyone. Power
isn’t what you say. It’s what people
believe you could say, but choose not
to. Now, here’s the coldest move of all.
Sometimes you don’t just ignore the
accusation. You invert it. Someone calls
you manipulative, smile, look past them,
and say if that’s how you see it. Not
defensive, not apologetic, just cool,
neutral detachment. What happens? They
scramble because they were hoping for a
fight. They were hoping to watch you
squirm. Instead, they’re left holding
their own weapon. That’s when the guilt
sets in on their side. They start
wondering if they overstepped, if they
embarrassed themselves, if they look
insecure now. And guess what? They do.
You just took the energy they threw at
you and made them carry it without
lifting a finger. There’s a moment when
silence becomes unbearable. Not for you,
but for the one who expected a reaction.
That’s when the tables turn. They
thought they were the accuser. Now
they’re exposed as the one begging for
attention. And you? You just became
something far more powerful than
innocent. You became untouchable.
Mchavelli understood something that most
people will never grasp. Words are not
to clarify truth, but to obscure it. And
when someone attacks you subtly or
directly, they want you to fight the
fog. They want to drown you in emotional
explanation because the more you
explain, the less certain you appear. So
instead, let them fill the silence. And
what happens? They overplay. They repeat
themselves. They start looking
desperate, emotional, unstable. You said
nothing, but now they’re the one under
judgment because the crowd isn’t
listening to what’s being said. They’re
watching who’s calm and who’s rattled.
That’s social power. And it doesn’t come
from being right. It comes from being
untouchable. Let’s say you’re in a
business meeting. Someone subtly
undermines you, says, “I’m not sure that
strategy is really thought through.” or
he always has these bold ideas. They’re
looking for a reaction. They want you to
bite. What do most people do? They lean
forward. They explain. They prove. They
clarify. They get nervous. The room
smells it. But the Mavellian operator,
he leans back. He waits. Maybe even
smirks. And if he speaks, it’s not a
defense. It’s a redirect. Let’s hear
your strategy, then. Now the attacker
has to perform and the room flips.
Suddenly they are being evaluated. They
are under pressure because silence from
the confident is accusation without
words. It makes people feel small
without you doing anything. In romantic
or personal relationships, this is even
more dangerous. Say your partner says
you don’t care about me anymore. The
average person will panic. They’ll
launch into explanations, reassurances,
defenses, and in doing so, they validate
the emotional frame. But the Mchavellian
approach is different. You don’t dismiss
them. You don’t argue. You let the
weight of the accusation hang. You watch
them feel their own drama echo in the
space. Then with calm, you respond,
“That’s not how I see it.” short,
grounded, no explanation, no
justification. Now they feel uncertain.
They question their own tone. They
wonder if they were too reactive because
in that moment you held power over what
matters most, the emotional tempo. And
whoever controls the tempo controls the
frame. There’s a deeper tactic. And it’s
even colder. Don’t just remain calm when
accused. Disappear. Someone insults you,
don’t reply. Don’t respond. Don’t
acknowledge, but don’t block them
either. Let your absence sit like a
mirror. Let them sit in the silence of
being ignored. This breaks people in two
ways. They realize you didn’t even deem
them worthy of a response. They start
spinning internal narratives and most of
the time it destroys their composure.
Why? Because the average person survives
on emotional validation. Even in
conflict, if you take that away, they
wither. They spiral. They post more.
They talk to others. They try to bait a
reply. And with every new attempt, they
look weaker, more obsessed, more
unhinged. All while you remain perfectly
still. And that’s when you win. Not
because you proved anything, but because
they destroyed themselves trying to get
a reaction from you. Here’s where it
gets elite. Instead of defending
yourself when attacked, make their
accusation look like a sign of weakness.
Someone calls you arrogant. Strange that
confidence makes people so
uncomfortable. Someone says you’re
manipulative. Only people who can’t be
influenced say that. Someone calls you
fake. Everyone says that when they stop
getting what they want. You don’t just
deny the accusation. You make it their
insecurity. And now, now they’re the
ones scrambling to defend themselves.
It’s not just a reversal. It’s a power
judo throw. You used their own emotional
force and turned it into their public
collapse. Makaveli would call this the
turn of the blade. Do not meet the sword
with a shield. Let the attacker fall on
his own blade. The world teaches you to
defend your reputation, to explain
yourself, to clear your name. But
Mchaveli saw the trap. He knew that the
moment you chase innocence, you admit
guilt. So the true strategist never
plays that game. Instead, he appears too
composed to be shaken, too elevated to
care, too clear on his position to
explain it. And slowly those who try to
tear him down start looking unstable,
reactive, jealous, weak. Because the
more you defend, the more it looks like
you need to. But the more you ignore,
the more dangerous they assume you are.
And that assumption is where power is
born. Most people think power is about
proving yourself. Proving you’re right,
proving you’re not what they say you
are. Proving you’re better than their
perception. But Makaveli would smirk at
this because the second you try to prove
anything, you’ve already declared the
other person’s judgment valid. And when
you hand someone that validation, you
hand them your leash. Let’s say you’re
in a group, a social setting, a dinner
table, a meeting. Someone throws a
public jab. You always act like you know
everything. Oh, he’s always like this. I
guess being humble isn’t your thing.
What do most people do? They tense up.
They try to laugh it off. Or worse, they
respond with an explanation, trying to
smooth it over, and they think they’re
saving face. But what they’re really
doing is confirming that a hit was
landed. Now everyone’s watching the
defense, and that alone makes the
original jab look true. Here’s what the
Machavelian does instead. Pause. Hold
silence for just two seconds. Scan the
room, not with aggression, but with
quiet amusement. Then, and only if
needed, offer something calm, precise,
and dismissive. You seem emotional today
or interesting take or nothing at all.
Just a long, still gaze. What happens
next is predictable. The attacker
shifts. They fidget. They look for
backup. They try to explain their joke.
They feel the heat of the room shifting
onto them because your lack of reaction
just told the room something louder than
words ever could. You’re not the one
under judgment. They are. In the digital
arena, things escalate even faster.
Comments, posts, call outs, DMs, people
trying to bait you into reacting. Here’s
the truth Makaveli would burn into your
mind. In the court of public opinion,
silence speaks guilt unless your silence
commands fear. So, here’s the tactic.
When you’re attacked online, don’t
defend. Don’t explain. Distort. You
don’t address the claim. You redirect
the energy back into the crowd. Example,
someone says you’re toxic or
manipulative. Instead of posting a
tearful defense or long clarification,
you post, “People always call you
dangerous when they can’t control you.
What just happened? You didn’t defend.
You reframed the accusation into a badge
of power. Now they look bitter. You look
unfased.” And the audience, they begin
to question who’s really in control.
That’s not damage control. That’s
narrative dominance. Let’s get even more
surgical. There are three tools you can
use instead of defending yourself.
Silence, the default, cold, powerful,
leaves them exposed. Deflection. Reframe
the narrative without acknowledging the
jab. Precision cuts. Short, sharp truths
that end the game immediately. Examples:
Someone says, “You’re full of yourself.”
You respond, “Confidence upsets the
insecure.” They say, “You’re fake.” You
respond, “I don’t owe you authenticity.”
They say, “You think you’re better than
everyone?” You respond, “No, I just
don’t think like everyone.” These aren’t
defenses. They’re status assertions.
They don’t say, “I’m not guilty. They
say you can’t touch me.” And that’s the
core. The Mchavellian never begs to be
seen as good. He dares people to see him
as bad and walks taller for it. When you
refuse to defend yourself, something
strange happens to your enemies. They
become unhinged because they expected a
battle and instead they’re swinging at
smoke. They start escalating. They push
harder. They get more dramatic. They
expose more of their insecurity. And the
more they do, the more you rise in the
eyes of others. Why? Because you’ve made
them perform their own collapse. And
that’s the Mchavelian endgame. You don’t
destroy your enemies. You let their
obsession with you destroy them. You
think being misunderstood is dangerous.
But being predictable is far worse. The
misunderstood man has mystery. The
predictable man is easy to manipulate.
People who are always trying to clear
things up are seen as desperate. People
who remain calmly misunderstood, they
are feared. Mchavelli knew this. It is
better to be feared than loved. if you
cannot be both. But even more, it’s
better to be confusing than predictable.
Because the confused man is cautious. He
watches you. He doesn’t act rashly. And
that means you control the field. Let’s
crush the final illusion. You don’t need
a good reputation to win. You need a
strong one. The man with a good
reputation is expected to be clean,
soft, agreeable. the man with a strong
reputation. He’s not always liked. He’s
not always trusted. But no one dares
move against him casually. That’s what
happens when you never defend yourself.
Your reputation becomes not about what
people believe, but what they fear
you’ll do next. That’s how you flip the
power. You stop fighting for approval.
And instead, you create an aura that
makes people cautious. Because even your
silence feels like a decision. And every
move you don’t make becomes a move in
their mind. The final evolution is not
silence. It’s aura. A presence so
composed, so secure, so far above the
petty noise that accusations simply
evaporate before they land. And this
doesn’t come from being emotionless. It
comes from being unbothered by design.
Because once you’ve trained yourself not
to defend, not to explain, not to seek
validation, you cross a line. A line
where your existence becomes the
defense. And that’s when power becomes
effortless. Think about the few people
in life who never explain themselves.
They don’t post long rants. They don’t
correct the record. They don’t argue
with critics. And yet people respect
them more. Why? Because silence in the
face of accusation creates myth. It
invites interpretation. And the human
mind, when left without an explanation,
fills the void with strength. People
assume you must be dangerous. You must
know something they don’t. You must be
so secure in who you are that you don’t
even blink when challenged. And that
assumption, that’s what makes people
follow you. Mchaveli didn’t care about
being good. He cared about being in
control. And the one who never defends
is always in control of perception, even
when surrounded by lies. Here’s the
paradox. The more you explain yourself,
the more alone you look. Because no one
feels the need to step in when you’re
already arguing on your own behalf. But
if you remain calm, if you stand silent,
unfazed, people start to feel the urge
to defend you. They say that was
uncalled for. He didn’t deserve that.
Why are you coming after him? He didn’t
even respond, and you’re still pushing.
Suddenly, they become your shield. And
what’s better than defending yourself,
letting others do it for you without
asking? That’s Mchavellian leverage. Let
the crowd argue your case while you
remain above the noise. Now you’re not
just respected. You’re elevated. It
doesn’t happen overnight. You build it
like a fortress stone by stone. By
acting with restraint. By choosing
stillness over reaction. By never
explaining more than you must. Start
here. Never correct insults that are
clearly meant to provoke. Let them
speak. Let them echo. Your silence tells
the room that the insult didn’t even
register on your radar. Respond to
indirect shots with calm confusion, not
offense. Is that how you see it? said
with total serenity. It dismantles the
emotional energy behind their attack.
Use short closing phrases instead of
defenses.
Noted. Okay. Think what you like. Time
will tell. Each one closes the door. It
doesn’t invite more debate. It ends the
scene. Study how you hold your face,
your body, your gaze. The Machavelian
never twitches, flinches, or tenses.
Stillness is his armor. And the more
still you are when others lose control,
the more your power expands silently.
When people don’t know how to provoke
you, they fear you because you become
unpredictable, not erratic, but
unreadable. A mirror that reflects their
own instability back at them. Marchaveli
would say, “The most dangerous man is
not the one who attacks first. It is the
one who never needs to. You will reach a
point where the attacks stop not because
you fought them, but because people know
they’ll lose before they start. Your
presence says, “I don’t play defense. I
let others destroy themselves while
trying to reach me.” There is a
difference between strength and
immunity. Strength still flinches, still
reacts, still gets emotional even if it
fights back. Immunity, it doesn’t even
acknowledge the hit. That’s the
Makyavellian ideal. You don’t win the
argument. You end the argument before it
starts by never needing to answer it.
Because when you no longer defend
yourself, people stop seeing you as
someone who needs to be put on trial.
You’re not on their level. You’ve moved
beyond the court of public approval. And
the only judgment that matters, your
own. From this point on, you don’t live
in defense. You live in definition. You
define your image. You define your tone.
You define your silence. And people feel
that. They feel the certainty behind
your eyes, the calmness in your posture,
the danger in your quiet. You’re not
resisting anymore. You’re commanding.
And that’s when the room shifts. The
crowd speaks less. Your enemies grow
quieter. Your name carries weight. Not
because you fought for it, but because
you never explained it. Never defending
yourself doesn’t mean never speaking. It
means speaking only when it shifts the
power. When you say something, it should
feel like a move, not a response.
Because every time you don’t explain
yourself, every time you hold still
while the world spins, you become the
one thing they can’t control. A man who
answers to no one.
Thank you. That was great cutting and pasting so the line breaks don’t get ignored and turned it into word soup.
Bkmk
Thank you - luckily this was a straight c/p operation, with no further input from me. I did toggle out the timestamps though.
If it had turned into a wall of text I wouldn’t have posted it here, to reap the wrath and ridicule of the multitudes...😁
Yes
Just got a good dose of that lol
Newsome and Bass have this down. Liberals have evidently trained on this.
In their mother’s milk.
Yup. They sure do get p!ssed when someone does something that they won’t do, but does it wrong.
* * * Silence –> Immunity * * *
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
So, we should buy a subscription? How about sharing the secret instead?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.