[Signalman]

"Trump’s administration promised it would provide full disclosure of the names of those involved in the sex trafficking operation."

Well...We're waiting.

[mass55th]

So release it!! What have you been waiting for?

[Antihero101607]

I’m sure we’ll get Mr. Dershowitz’s list of names for review after we finally see Adam Schiff’s proof of Donald Trump colluding with Russia in 2016.

[ClearCase_guy]

"But I’m bound by confidentiality,”

See, this is why I would never be allowed to get to a position of real importance. Because if I were in Dershowitz's shoes, I would 100% throw caution to the wind and shout out all the names I had. I would spill it all. Damn the consequences. I think it's shameful that this old man isn't doing that.

[PGR88]

I’ll start:

Bill Clinton, Bill Gates.....

[DouglasKC]

Trump is going to destroy MAGA with this and with the Ukraine war decision.

[Bratch]

“Documents are being suppressed to protect individuals. I know the names of the individuals.
I know why they’re being suppressed. I know who’s suppressing them.
But I’m bound by confidentiality,” he said.

[Destroyer Sailor]

Not really. Some might want to know. I could care less.

[marron]

The “client list” on official stationary doesn’t exist, but the evidence to develop such a list certainly does exist. We just need FBI to do the work to put the list together and make it public.

[xone]

Well...We're waiting

And you'll get it when it is time. The public doesn't run the timeline. OBTW we are NOT there yet. Enjoy your life.

[Steve_Seattle]

" . . . the DOJ and FBI confirmed, at least according to them, that infamous pedophile sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein did not keep a client list."

The term "client list" offers a lot of wiggle room. What qualifies as a "client list"? Anyway, I thought we had the flight logs to the island and knew who the passengers were. Or am I remembering wrong?

[ArcadeQuarters]

“But I’m bound by confidentiality”

Of course.

[rxsid]

[rdcbn1]

Dershowitz was Epstein's lawyer and he is the guy who negotiated Epstein's plea deal with the DOJ.

He knows exactly what was going on.

This whole thing is beginning to look like a Trump earned media operation to roll out the Epstein disclosures.

[Cold Heart]

Just release the democrat names:)

[MtnClimber]

Is there an opportunity to oust John Roberts with this information? It would be great to replace him and there are rumors.

[CodeToad]

The admin has already said there are no names, so he cannot legally be held responsible for releasing what he knows.

[Seruzawa]

So, why say anything. Pointless attention seeking ambulance chaser.

[TexasGator]

“Pam Bondi’s exact statement that Jeffrey Epstein’s client list was sitting on her desk for review,”

Outright lie or misrepresentation.

Her exact statement never said client list.

[Quickgun]

A list of names means exactly nothing. I fail to even see why it is an issue. Hell, I could make up a list of democrats we don’t like, and just call it good...

[Starboard]

but Leavitt said Bondi was referring to all the documents of the case, not particularly about the client list,”

*************

The question asked by Fox reporter John Roberts to Pam Bondi back in February was "DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients. Will that really happen?" In response, Bondi stated, "It's sitting right now on my desk to review". Note the reply is "It's" -- not they or those.