To: Red Badger
To: Red Badger
Just a decade away. /sarc off
3 posted on
05/28/2025 6:03:08 AM PDT by
Skwor
To: Red Badger
And the 30 million acre Gulf of America wind farm........?
4 posted on
05/28/2025 6:06:44 AM PDT by
rktman
(Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this๐ฉ? ๐ซ๐! ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐!)
To: Red Badger
5 posted on
05/28/2025 6:07:01 AM PDT by
blackdog
((Z28.310) Be careful what you say. Your refrigerator may be listening & reporting you.)
To: Red Badger
Why don’t they just go to the Sun and scoop up some material that is already undergoing fusion to power a reactor? They could use something like a giant spoon. It might get too hot so they might need to do it at night.
9 posted on
05/28/2025 6:13:52 AM PDT by
MtnClimber
(For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
To: Red Badger
So far actual fusion has just been a fleeting laboratory experiment and no where near to a sustained source of power for commercial use. There have been predictions that fusion power is just a few years away for the last 30 years. Maybe someday, but not likely in the near future
To: Red Badger
Direct detection of Gravity waves was something that once was ‘Only 20 years away’. Einstein believed it would never be achieved. In 2015 it was achieved.
15 posted on
05/28/2025 6:31:41 AM PDT by
Nateman
(Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
To: Red Badger
Does anyone else find the project name, "Infinity Two", to be a really funny bit of grad student humor that goes undetected by the institutions handing out cash?
What's next? "From here to Infinity and Back"? Our enthusiasm for wordsmithed phrases of promise have made the American version of language quite disingenuous and contradictory at times.
17 posted on
05/28/2025 6:32:39 AM PDT by
blackdog
((Z28.310) Be careful what you say. Your refrigerator may be listening & reporting you.)
To: Red Badger
Wake me when they have an operating experimental design and have successfully produced profitable surplus power for a year.
Frankly, this all smacks as intentional delay like they’re withholding key tech from researchers.
22 posted on
05/28/2025 6:44:31 AM PDT by
logi_cal869
(-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -')
To: Red Badger
a sound foundation for continued design development of what could be LOL!
25 posted on
05/28/2025 6:50:48 AM PDT by
fruser1
To: Red Badger
If they did work the environmentalists and socialists would work to scrap them.
To: Red Badger
If it’s for real this time, the anti-electricity woo-woos of the left will find some reason to be against it.
30 posted on
05/28/2025 7:50:30 AM PDT by
Salman
(Avoid foreign entanglements.)
To: Red Badger
I don’t know why i clicked on this post but I believe it is due to OCD in some way.
To: Red Badger
Livermore made the first reactor that maybe broke even (produced more power than it used) in 2025.
Iโm calling BS.
To: Red Badger
“The company has also leveraged a partner-rich commercialization program”
This crap was written by some Harvard MBA, wasn’t it?
44 posted on
05/28/2025 9:01:34 AM PDT by
doorgunner69
(Your oath of enlistment has no expiration date)
To: Red Badger
This is a press release, not a news article, as it pretends to be.
49 posted on
05/28/2025 9:37:25 AM PDT by
nicollo
(Trump beat the cheat! )
To: Red Badger
If the word nuclear appears in any licensing docs the treehuggers will not allow it. Never. Not in the US.
50 posted on
05/28/2025 10:34:24 AM PDT by
bobbo666
To: Red Badger
Interesting article. Thx for posting.
60 posted on
05/28/2025 8:12:48 PM PDT by
tennmountainman
( (โLess propaganda would be appreciated.โ JimRobr 12-2-2023 DITTO)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson