Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RAND PAUL on Fox News Sunday
X / Fox News ^ | May 25 | Shannon Bream

Posted on 05/25/2025 7:54:17 AM PDT by RandFan

@RandPaul

Only in Washington does a “budget” mean spending more.

[Video linked in Tweet]

Paraphrasing/Notes:

I supported the tax cuts. I support making them permanent

I support spending cuts even though they're wimpy [in the bill].

The problem is the math doesn't add up.

They're exploding the debt...

The deficit will be $2.2 trillion. We used to say that's Biden spending, Biden-omics.

There has to be someone left in Washington that says debts and deficits are Wrong.

This is just not a serious proposal.

Regarding the 'free' stuff (Medicare, Medicaid and SNAP), we're borrowing the money, which means more inflation.

There is no free stuff because it means inflation. It's a bait and switch, it's no good... The deficit is the biggest threat to our country.

I get criticized but I'm the one ringing the alarm bell here: THEY'RE NOT DOING ANYHING! We have the majority but there's No recission package (of DOGE cuts), no cuts, nothing for conservatives!

RE: Tulsi Gabbard put on terror watch list: This is offensive to every civil liberty in this country. I will get to the bottom of this. This is a real problem and I think they might be monitoring more members of congress or ex-members of congress.

I want to find out who came up with this idea to put Tulsi Gabbard on a terror list and they need to be [fired]

(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: 2026wipeout; artofthedeal; bankrupt; bankruptnation; beautiful; big; bigandbeautiful; magasnowflakes; realconservative; tariffsaretaxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 last
To: Bruce Campbells Chin
Actually, Trump's opponent wasn't Biden, it was Harris. Who, despite being an idiot, did not have dementia. But regardless of dementia or a lack of intelligence, the progressive policies of Biden and Harris made them flatly unacceptable to me. There were things I didn't like about Trump, but he was a lot better than they were.

We're on the same page on this one - Trump was a LOT better - and yeah on the last point 'Yikes" I was wrong. Didn't read you correctly on that.

81 posted on 05/25/2025 7:12:32 PM PDT by GOPJ (Next liberal scam to steal voter sanity will be based on loneliness, control of the young & lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: JayGalt
Except the only spending in the bill is the wall & the golden dome which are not ten year projects.

That is simply not true. I mean, just read what you wrote there.

82 posted on 05/25/2025 8:01:48 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

Except it ia true. I quoted Stephen Miller.

This post by Stephen Miller clarifies a lot of common misconceptions. I hope you find it interesting.

“I’ve seen a few claims making the rounds on the Big Beautiful Bill that require correction.”

“The first is that it doesn’t “codify the DOGE cuts.” A reconciliation bill, which is a budget bill that passes with 50 votes, is limited by senate rules to “mandatory” spending only — eg Medicaid and Food Stamps. The senate rules prevent it from cutting “discretionary” spending — eg the Department of Education or federal grants. The DOGE cuts are overwhelmingly discretionary, not mandatory. The bill saves more than 1.6 TRILLION in mandatory spending, including the largest-ever welfare reform. A remarkable achievement.”

“I’ve also seen claims the bill increases the deficit. This lie is based on a CBO accounting gimmick. Income tax rates from the 2017 tax cut are set to expire in September. They were always planned to be permanent. CBO says maintaining *current* rates adds to the deficit, but by definition leaving these income tax rates unchanged cannot add one penny to the deficit. The bill’s spending cuts REDUCE the deficit against the current law baseline, which is the only correct baseline to use.”

“Another fantastically false claim is that the bill spends trillions of dollars. This is just completely invented out of whole cloth. This is not a ten year budget bill—it doesn’t “fund” almost any operations of government, which are funded in the annual budget bills (which this is not). In other words, if this bill passed, but the annual budget bill did not, there would be no government funding. Under the math that critics are using, if we passed a one paragraph reconciliation bill that cut simply 50 billion in food stamp spending, they would say the bill “added” trillions in spending and debt because they are counting ALL the projected federal spending that exists entirely outside the scope of this legislation, which is of course preposterous. The only funding in the bill is for the President’s border and defense priorities, while enacting a net spending cut of over 1.6 TRILLION dollars.”

“The bill has two fiscal components: a massive tax cut and a massive spending cut.”
https://x.com/StephenM/status/1926715409807397204


83 posted on 05/25/2025 9:24:39 PM PDT by JayGalt (Fight! Fight! Fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson