Skip to comments.
FDA will limit Covid vaccines to people over 65 or at high risk of serious illness, leaders say
statnews ^
| 05/20/2025
| By Helen Branswell, Matthew Herper, and Lizzy Lawrence
Posted on 05/20/2025 11:46:03 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Now all of a sudden they do this? What a crock.
To: ChicagoConservative27
Why did covid stop at 19?
2
posted on
05/20/2025 11:49:14 AM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
("Throw me to the wolves and I'll return leading the pack"- Donald J. Trump)
To: ChicagoConservative27
There are certain folks that really should be facing a sentence to the gallows for this BS...and then some.
3
posted on
05/20/2025 11:49:36 AM PDT
by
lgjhn23
("On the 8th day, Satan created the progressive liberal to destroy all the good that God created...")
To: ChicagoConservative27
Limit access, my ass. They’re going to make it compulsory.
4
posted on
05/20/2025 11:50:15 AM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
("Throw me to the wolves and I'll return leading the pack"- Donald J. Trump)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Another FDA euthanasia plan? I’m over 65 and will take my chances by refusing the vax.
To: ChicagoConservative27
They still have covid vaccines?
Must mean people are still getting covid. Or might.
My MD told me not to get that vax.
6
posted on
05/20/2025 11:50:39 AM PDT
by
Veto!
(Trump Is Superman)
To: ChicagoConservative27
As an over seventy, you shoot me, i shoot back.
7
posted on
05/20/2025 11:50:43 AM PDT
by
exnavy
(See article IV section 4 of our constitution.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Not a crock
This is part of what RFK jr was hired to do
8
posted on
05/20/2025 11:51:34 AM PDT
by
algore
To: ChicagoConservative27
Now the government is going to limit the administration of the “clot shot” to the elderly so as to commit senicide? And the argument is anyone over 65 is “more susceptible to infection” than anyone else? How convenient. Are you f’n kidding me?
9
posted on
05/20/2025 11:52:34 AM PDT
by
4Runner
("I gotta join a union just to get a job loafin'?" " Sure ya do!" --Abbott & Costello)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
10
posted on
05/20/2025 11:52:43 AM PDT
by
albie
(U)
To: ChicagoConservative27
11
posted on
05/20/2025 12:00:03 PM PDT
by
jagusafr
( )
To: ChicagoConservative27
Well, that’s ONE WAY TO SAVE SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE..............
12
posted on
05/20/2025 12:01:38 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
To: ChicagoConservative27
The data as to who got a life-threatening infection from Covid support the change to recommending as only necessary for the elderly and those with any co-morbidity health conditions that make them more vulnerable. Otherwise young and healthy folks are not at high risk of a fatal infection. Vaccine for the healthy but older folks may help with regard to bad infections from close younger family members they live with or who they see frequently who may have a viral infection that does not mean the same severity for them.
But even then, in my book, if you must, go for a non-mRNA vaccine, not an mRNA vaccine.
13
posted on
05/20/2025 12:05:10 PM PDT
by
Wuli
(.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
How many people have been harmed this year because rfk jr couldn’t act on the first day regarding something much more important than food dye?
14
posted on
05/20/2025 12:07:06 PM PDT
by
logi_cal869
(-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -')
To: logi_cal869
“”How many people have been harmed this year because rfk jr couldn’t act on the first day regarding something much more important than food dye?””
Or... more important than keeping people on SNAP from being able to buy sodas.
To: Danie_2023
16
posted on
05/20/2025 12:22:54 PM PDT
by
logi_cal869
(-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -')
To: ChicagoConservative27
Queue Bart Simpson; “What an odd thing to say.”
17
posted on
05/20/2025 12:28:43 PM PDT
by
mykroar
("It's Not the Nature of the Evidence; It's the Seriousness of the Charge." - El Rushbo)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
“I’m over 65 and will take my chances by refusing the vax”
You’d be taking more of a chance if you GOT the shot IMO....also, I refuse to call it a “vaccine”.
18
posted on
05/20/2025 12:30:44 PM PDT
by
V_TWIN
(America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!)
To: 4Runner; All
Ever since the Covid hoax began six years ago, my wife have essentially ignored all the hoopla. We laugh at those still masking and the gays with their bicycle helmets.
19
posted on
05/20/2025 12:30:50 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
(ECommon sense isn’t common anymore.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Anxious to cut their social security and Medicare liability costs by hastening death with a harmful "vaxxine".
20
posted on
05/20/2025 12:39:37 PM PDT
by
Myrddin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson