Posted on 05/13/2025 7:24:32 AM PDT by Rev M. Bresciani
“Why is it that man ever chooses to sin? The answer is that man has fallen away from God (and) his whole nature has become perverted and sinful. Man’s whole bias is away from God. By nature he hates God and feels that God is opposed to him. His god is himself…his own abilities and powers and desires (Man) likes and covets the things which God prohibits, and dislikes the things and kind of life to which God calls him. These are no mere dogmatic statements. They are facts (that) alone explain the moral muddle and the ugliness that characterize life to such an extent today. “D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones
(Excerpt) Read more at new.americanprophet.org ...
All adaptations are is trait breeding. Animal husbandry 101
Then the word mutation became common which implies something else.
Then came mutant ninja turtles, which explained it to a a whole generation .
Exactly- mutations subtract info- but evolutionists would have us believe that millions of mutations added positive information not specific to a species when it evolved into another species kind-
The mathematical odds of just one positive mutation adding new non species specific info is so high that it is impossible- way beyon the upper limits of probability- that is for just 1 - now try to imagine millions perhaps billions of mutations violating natural law to overcome species genetic protection systems to push said species to another species kind-
Didn't happen- Secular mathematicians concluded that very thing at a symposium on evolution in Chicago i believe it was- -
For four cards, the formula is 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 = 24. Try it! You can arrange only 4 cards in 24 separate ways.
If there were 5 cards, then the chances of a particular arrangement by chance are 1 in 120 (1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5).
We suggest that you click here to see how this works, otherwise you find it difficult to believe what follows. Because when you get to the 20th card, there are more different combinations of cards than there are seconds in two billion years...
With 9 there are 362,880, with 10 there are 3,628,800, with 11 there are 39,916,800, with 12 there are 479,001,600, with 13 there are 6,227,020,800, with 14 there are 87,178,291,200, with 15 there are 1,307,674,368,000, with 16 there are 20,922,789,888,000, with 17 there are 355,687,428,096,000, with 18 there are 6,402,373,705,728,000, with 19 there are 121,645,100,408,832,000, and with 20 there are 2,432,902,008,176,640,000 random combinations.
There are only 1,051,200,000,000,000 seconds in two billion years. So, with the random combinations of just 20 cards, one has already surpassed the number of seconds in two billion years by more than two thousand times...
There are 1,051,200,000,000,000 seconds in two billion years and there are 1,000,000,000,000,000 neurological connections - this would require a rate of evolution of approximately one fully perfected connection per second for two billion years. And is hardly even the beginning, because at the same time one would have to evolve a non-physical digital (?) code that describes not only millions upon millions of separate colors, but also every sensation, emotion and thought of man.
http://creationdesign.org/english/chances.html
An occurrence that has more than one chance in 1050, it has a statistically zero chance of actually occurring.
"Mathematicians agree that any requisite number beyond 1050 has, statistically, a zero probability of occurrence."
I.L. Cohen, Darwin Was Wrong: A Study in Probabilities (New York: NW Research Publications, Inc., 1984), p. 205 (as quoted in Vance Ferrell, The Evolution Handbook (Evolution Facts, Inc., Altamont TN, 2001) p. 260
In order to circumvent the problem of statistical zero, evolutionists often argue that "Given enough time, anything can happen." This is not a rational argument. It proves nothing. It is a reference to practically infinite periods of time that lie beyond statistical zero.
"A further aspect I should like to discuss is what I call the practice of avoiding the conclusion that the probability of a self-producing state is zero ... When for practical purposes the condition of infinite time and matter has to be invoked, the concept of probability is annulled. By such logic we can prove anything ... "
P.T. Mora, The Folly of Probability, as quoted in Origins 13(2):98-104 (1986) Geoscience Research Institute, Loma Lind University, 1986. Emphasis supplied.
In fact the chances of the chance formation of just DNA - much less all of the applications of DNA - are so remote, they are far beyond statistical zero.
"This means that 1089190 DNA molecules, on average, must form to provide the one chance of forming the specific DNA sequence necessary to code 124 proteins. 1089190 DNAs would weigh 1089147 more than the earth ... A quantity of DNA this colossal could never have been formed.
R.L. Wysong, The Creation Evolution Controversy, (Inquiry Press, Midland MI, 1976) p.115, as quoted in The Evolution Handbook (Evolution Facts, Inc., Altamont TN, 2001) p. 261. Same Website as above
All adaptations are is trait breeding. Animal husbandry 101. It just occurs in nature without human intervention.
—
But it is more likely with human intervention. Look at horses and cows, hybridization has produced many subspecies compared with those found in the wild. Then there is, gain-of-function.
Plus, he “borrows” work that others write on their own websites. So he gets the revenue from clicks instead of the author.
...........................................................
Do you see this is exactly how FR gets content? And FR raises funds from that content? There is nothing wrong with that. Posts like this are one of the main reasons why I read FR, and donate to FR for it. Thank you Free Republic!
Do you not see that this is his own blog/website that he is promoting, and he is the only one promoting it here? Jim Rob allows us to post on HIS website articles from everywhere, so that people across the world can not only be informed, but we can talk WITH EACH OTHER about a number of topics.
Why does the Reverend not post the original link to the author’s original work? Does he get permission to repost someone else’s work on his website or does he post it on his website without their knowledge? Writers make money sometimes based on how many clicks they get on their own material. If they don’t get the clicks, they don’t get paid. That doesn’t seem right to me for them to miss out on what is rightly their earnings. The revenue goes to the wrong person.
I’m sorry but I disagree with you. I don’t get paid for posting articles here. The Reverend does because the rest of the article redirects to his website. I may be in the minority on this, so I won’t bother piping up, but to me, it’s blog pimping clickbait. That’s not what FR is about.
Why does he not follow the rules and post to the Religion threads.
Why pollute Chat?
Good point. He doesn’t respond to anyone either. Just posts and runs. I might feel differently if he participated other than just posting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.