Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/25/2025 7:20:55 AM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

What a shame. /s


2 posted on 04/25/2025 7:24:05 AM PDT by curious7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

I’d rather close the whole thing.

The deployment requirement will likely chase out any FEMA employees who are slightly normal, are married, have children, and understand the real world to some extent. The only employees left will be 20-something ideologues who will dedicate their lives to taking advantage of people who have been devastated by disasters.


3 posted on 04/25/2025 7:27:12 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
FEMA office staff ....... mandatory deployment.......... will likely create anxiety for them.......

Poor babies. Perhaps they should find other jobs, or simply suck it up like other people do.

4 posted on 04/25/2025 7:28:12 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

This old web page is still up there...

Getting rid of the employees who created it is a no brainer:

https://www.fema.gov/event/helping-lgbtqi-community-disasters-preparedness-and-mitigation-considerations


5 posted on 04/25/2025 7:29:18 AM PDT by cgbg (It was not us. It was them--all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
I'll say that if managerial people are forced into the field to work disasters...

FEMA will rent or lease out blocks of rooms in moderate to high end whole hotels for those people

If hotels aren't available, they will charter cruise ships and bring them into the are if possible

The agency will try to put people up in the best accommodations available, before they managerial types are bedded in the communal tents with all the regular field workers

7 posted on 04/25/2025 7:59:17 AM PDT by backpacker_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Well, we don’t want them to have anxiety.


8 posted on 04/25/2025 8:11:16 AM PDT by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Finally. Get the bureaucrats off their fat useless butts and make them at least pretend to do something.


9 posted on 04/25/2025 8:23:24 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Close FEMA. States should be run by state governments which keeps politics local. Feds should only enjoin when necessary to protect the welfare of the citizenry when needed.


10 posted on 04/25/2025 9:04:13 AM PDT by Racketeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Sounds like a good plan...


11 posted on 04/25/2025 10:04:04 AM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is rabble-rising Sam Adams now that we need him? Is his name Trump, now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
but mandatory deployment minimums will likely create anxiety for them, said Michael Coen

Oh the tragedy! Maybe now these people will at least have some empathy with those whose homes are literally gone...
12 posted on 04/26/2025 4:11:36 PM PDT by Svartalfiar (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson