[RandFan]

Wow! How interesting is this?

[CatOwner]

US Government, or the deep state?

[Wilderness Conservative]

The video of the missile hitting the Pentagon and being passed off as an airliner got me asking questions pretty early on.

[SaveFerris]

🤔🤔🤔

[The Louiswu]

What a crazy world we live in…someone should sell tickets.

[cgbg]

The Senator has no clue how deep this rabbit hole goes...

I almost feel sorry for the guy.

[Wayne07]

Pathetic nuttery. Truly horseshoe theory where the kooky right is regurgitating the same BS as the deranged left.

Who knew that FreeRepublic would turn into a home for anti-Americans and anti-Semites. It’s sad and gross. You could take these posts and comments and graft them straight into Dem Underground, without editing, and they’d read like a deranged leftists wrote them.

[Robert DeLong]

Well, it certainly raises questions as to what made Tower 7 collapse in on itself much like a controlled demolition would. It wasn’t hit by anything, and I doubt it was the fire started by debris from the collapsed north tower that had fallen, so what did bring it down? Could it have been vibrations from the twin towers collapsing? But if that were the case what caused the delay with it actually falling?

[imabadboy99]

whata did G W MORON and Dick Cheney know and when did they know it?

[MacNaughton]

... The two also discussed the possibility of Congressional hearings into the 9/11 attacks. When asked what he wanted to know, Sen. Johnson focused on Building 7 – which conspiracy theorists have claimed went down in a controlled demolition>

“Start with Building 7,” he said. “I don’t know if you can find structural engineers other than the ones that had the corrupt investigation inside NIST that would say that thing didn’t come down in any other way than a controlled demolition.”

YouTube, 2023, "Calling Out Bravo 7 | 2020 Edition", 01:42:08
Firefighters talk about fire physics, building designs and explain why they continue to commit into high-rise fires without fear of sudden and complete building failure. The science of fire behavior and basic physics is used to show how normal office fires cannot create the same outcome observed in both a controlled demolition or the freefall collapse of World Trade Center Building-7.

Details include:
*A summary of the history of high-rise fires and their impact on the architecture involved
*The importance of understanding science rather than relying upon consensus opinion
The science of freefall and how this provides an irrefutable yardstick of truth
*The assessment of the rate of descent of WTC7
*An analysis of the real fires in WTC7 versus the theoretical fires proposed by NIST
*An analysis of the claim that WTC7 was left to burn due to poor firefighting water supplies
*A brief exposure of the certain foreknowledge held by NY City officials of the collapse of all three towers
*The decision of NIST to ignore the fundamental principle of scientific investigation known as ‘Occam’s Razor’
*A summary of NIST’s many omissions, errors and attempts to mislead the public
*A summary of the results of Alaska University’s 2019 evaluation of the collapse of WTC7 which identified that fires could NOT have been the cause of the collapse
*An appeal for support and justice from New York Fire Commissioner Christopher Gioia

[Hot Tabasco]

“I don’t know if you can find structural engineers...that would say that thing didn’t come down in any other way than a controlled demolition.”

Then these so called engineers should talk to the company responsible for the controlled demolition of Detroit's Hudson building.

CDI’s 12 person loading crew took twenty-four days to place 4,118 separate charges in 1,100 locations on columns on nine levels of the complex. Over 36,000 ft of detonating cord and 4,512 non-electric delay elements were installed in CDI’s implosion initiation system, some to create the 36 primary implosion sequence and another 216 micro-delays to keep down the detonation overpressure from the 2,728 lb of explosives which would be detonated during the demolition.

https://www.controlled-demolition.com/explosives-demolition/projects/jl-hudson-department-store/

[central_va]

Ron has gone soft in the head.

[Biblebelter]

When you NEVER get the WHOLE truth, one starts to question what is the truth.

Putting this debate aside.

I will NEVER believe that the Saudis didn’t know MORE than they said they knew.

The gubmint still has NOT come up with credible information on the Anthrax stuff.

There is NO logical explanation of Osama bin Laden hiding in plain sight at the behest of one our “allies” which is a figurative indictment of the Bush/Cheney crime families.

The fact that Obama bin Laden and Biden get credit for taking out Osama bin Laden is a treacherous DISGRACE to the entire GOPe and the Republican wing of the uniparty.

And when one returns to the PRESENT TIME, Americans still have NO credible evidence of who that 20 year old dietary assistant at nursing home was who the gubmint would have us believe was a crazed lone assassin.

I don’t want to question the gubmint’s 9/11 narrative for no other reason than it makes me appear to be on the same side of an issue as Rosie O’Donnell and all the left-wing loonies.

I have NO doubt Trump would like to get to the truth on all things.

But the Deep State is a colossal onion and there are just so many layers to peel back to even get a glimpse of the truth.

[faucetman]

I recall reading about building 7 back in the day.

I don’t recall all the details, but I do remember my conclusion, which was that all the evidence suggested a controlled demolition. No other evidence of why it could have collapsed.

But of course we can’t have an intelligent discussion about it.

[PLMerite]

WTC 7 was the site of the Mayor’s command bunker. Part of this were 6000-gallon diesel fuel tanks for emergency generators, which was located at about the third-floor level.

https://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/WTC/7WTC.html

[Pearls Before Swine]

I have an old friend who’s really into this theory. My reply to him was, “I’m a birther, not a truther.”