Just kidding - different fellow with the same name wrote it. At least he didn't drone on about being an anti-Semite traumatized WWII baby like SOME people.
Posted on 04/16/2025 9:23:03 AM PDT by Miami Rebel
So WSJ decided to save itself by repositioning for a spot on the supermarket rag counter right next to the Dianna carried off by aliens headlines.
Well St Clair is a gold digger who thought she was smarter and could get more money. She was wrong...
Turned down $15 million. Bitch be trippin’
It doesn't matter how much Elon is helping "our side". God is much more impressed by a person's humbleness. By his or her lack of pride. Indeed, we are SUPPOSED to be humble.
That is a quality that Musk seems to lack, a lot.
They are desperate.
And we have a troll who loves posting anything negative about the Trump administration.
Sounds like the WSJ is being pushed out into the open by its deep-state masters.
The story is based on the claims of a “baby momma” whose child Musk disputes the paternity of.
And then some internet “influencer” - who claims to have rec’d a message from Musk, among her many followers.
Sounds like WSJ is being forced to go full CNN
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The best explanation.
Elon is concerned that as a nation we are not reproducing enough, so like most entrepreneurs, he wants to fix it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
And since the covidbiocrime “vaccines” have reduced fertility in men and women on a very large scale, thus reducing the birth rate which was already low, more babies are definitely needed.
We’re at 1.66 births per woman. The natives are not reproducing in the U.S.
Check his signup date....
BTW I’ve got a working theory about Gen.Flynn.... will post when I get it completed.
“All the “allegeds” and “allegedlys” in the world wouldn’t change that.” in the world wouldn’t change that.”
actually, all the “allegeds” and “allegedlys” are what MAKE the story “accurate”, or at least not libelous ...
one can pretty much legally get away with publishing ANYTHING if one uses enough “alleged” and “allegedlys”: it’s how the Democrat propaganda media operate ... smearing without TECHNICALLY smearing ...
Okay, ping me for it, please.
Just kidding - different fellow with the same name wrote it. At least he didn't drone on about being an anti-Semite traumatized WWII baby like SOME people.
I will. I have it outlined. I need to add some images too.
The New York Times will definitely get into the gutter and even risk defamation suits when it's in panic mode, protecting the Elites which own it.
Published January 31, 2023 7:00am ESTExcerpt:"The liberal media watchdog the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR) published a wide-ranging retrospective of the media's Russiagate coverage that examined several news organizations and their various roles throughout the Trump-Russia saga, leveling the most criticism toward The New York Times."No narrative did more to shape Trump’s relations with the press than Russiagate. The story, which included the Steele dossier and the Mueller report among other totemic moments, resulted in Pulitzer Prizes as well as embarrassing retractions and damaged careers," CJR executive editor Kyle Pope wrote in an editor's note. "
That’s simply not so.
You cannot print, “People are saying that he sleeps with his sister,” or, “allegedly he stole millions from an anti-child trafficking organization” and except those qualifiers to afford protection against defamation liability.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.