Just kidding - different fellow with the same name wrote it. At least he didn't drone on about being an anti-Semite traumatized WWII baby like SOME people.
Posted on 04/16/2025 9:23:03 AM PDT by Miami Rebel
A shocking new exposé from The Wall Street Journal alleged that Elon Musk, billionaire tech mogul and Trump administration insider, is attempting to quietly build a “legion” of offspring protected by secret settlements and NDAs while using his social media influence on X to approach influencers he hopes will have his children.
The sprawling, 6,000-word article published Tuesday lays bare the tactics Musk allegedly employs to manage the mothers of his many children and his privacy, all while reshaping public policy and chasing a vision of human survival that veers into sci-fi territory.
The profile begins with a dive into Musk’s entanglement with Ashley St. Clair, a 26-year-old right-wing influencer and former Babylon Bee staffer, who claims to be the mother of one of his children after what began as a social media flirtation.
According to the Journal report, Musk told St. Clair during her pregnancy that they would need to have more children to “reach legion-level before the apocalypse” and floated the idea of using surrogates to produce them faster.
At the same time, Musk reportedly offered St. Clair a one-time payment of $15 million and $100,000 a month in support — on the condition that she stay silent about the child and their relationship.
After her baby was born, when she requested a paternity test, the Journal reports she was directed to Musk’s longtime fixer Jared Birchall.
During a two-hour phone call in December, Birchall described Musk as a “very big-hearted, kind and generous person,” but warned St. Clair that going through legal channels “always, always leads to a worse outcome for that woman.” He added that Musk wasn’t yet convinced the child was his.
“I don’t want my son to feel like he’s a secret,” St. Clair reportedly replied.
Birchall reportedly warned St. Clair that “to not sign some agreement associated with handing over 15-plus million dollars is absolutely insane and irresponsible,” adding that they’ve dealt with “some very unstable, mentally unstable, people.”
When she didn’t sign the NDA, the payments were reportedly slashed, and eventually cut again to $20,000 a month. According to St. Clair’s attorney, the “money is being weaponized.”
The Journal report also revealed that on Friday, a paternity test returned Musk’s “Probability of Paternity” at 99.9999%.
In another bizarre episode reported by the Journal, Musk allegedly used his social media platform to approach cryptocurrency influencer Tiffany Fong.
The report said Musk sent Fong a direct message asking if she wanted to have his baby — despite never having met her in person. Fong confided in friends about the advance, and once Musk found out, he unfollowed her, and her X earnings reportedly nosedived. At the peak of Musk’s engagement with her posting, she apparently raked in $21,000 over a two-week stretch on his platform.
Musk, according to the Journal, commonly refers to his ever-expanding brood as a “legion” and has been seeking to recruit new mothers via his platform X. Musk has had at least 14 children with four women, including the musician Grimes, but multiple sources told the Journal they believe Musk has fathered many more.
So WSJ decided to save itself by repositioning for a spot on the supermarket rag counter right next to the Dianna carried off by aliens headlines.
Well St Clair is a gold digger who thought she was smarter and could get more money. She was wrong...
Turned down $15 million. Bitch be trippin’
It doesn't matter how much Elon is helping "our side". God is much more impressed by a person's humbleness. By his or her lack of pride. Indeed, we are SUPPOSED to be humble.
That is a quality that Musk seems to lack, a lot.
They are desperate.
And we have a troll who loves posting anything negative about the Trump administration.
Sounds like the WSJ is being pushed out into the open by its deep-state masters.
The story is based on the claims of a “baby momma” whose child Musk disputes the paternity of.
And then some internet “influencer” - who claims to have rec’d a message from Musk, among her many followers.
Sounds like WSJ is being forced to go full CNN
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The best explanation.
Elon is concerned that as a nation we are not reproducing enough, so like most entrepreneurs, he wants to fix it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
And since the covidbiocrime “vaccines” have reduced fertility in men and women on a very large scale, thus reducing the birth rate which was already low, more babies are definitely needed.
We’re at 1.66 births per woman. The natives are not reproducing in the U.S.
Check his signup date....
BTW I’ve got a working theory about Gen.Flynn.... will post when I get it completed.
“All the “allegeds” and “allegedlys” in the world wouldn’t change that.” in the world wouldn’t change that.”
actually, all the “allegeds” and “allegedlys” are what MAKE the story “accurate”, or at least not libelous ...
one can pretty much legally get away with publishing ANYTHING if one uses enough “alleged” and “allegedlys”: it’s how the Democrat propaganda media operate ... smearing without TECHNICALLY smearing ...
Okay, ping me for it, please.
Just kidding - different fellow with the same name wrote it. At least he didn't drone on about being an anti-Semite traumatized WWII baby like SOME people.
I will. I have it outlined. I need to add some images too.
The New York Times will definitely get into the gutter and even risk defamation suits when it's in panic mode, protecting the Elites which own it.
Published January 31, 2023 7:00am ESTExcerpt:"The liberal media watchdog the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR) published a wide-ranging retrospective of the media's Russiagate coverage that examined several news organizations and their various roles throughout the Trump-Russia saga, leveling the most criticism toward The New York Times."No narrative did more to shape Trump’s relations with the press than Russiagate. The story, which included the Steele dossier and the Mueller report among other totemic moments, resulted in Pulitzer Prizes as well as embarrassing retractions and damaged careers," CJR executive editor Kyle Pope wrote in an editor's note. "
That’s simply not so.
You cannot print, “People are saying that he sleeps with his sister,” or, “allegedly he stole millions from an anti-child trafficking organization” and except those qualifiers to afford protection against defamation liability.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.